Skip to content

· Private foundation

Raymond & Mary D Barnett Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$299kReligion$9kEmployment$4k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$509k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEFFERSON COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE$7,000
NORTHERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY$6,000
EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY$6,000
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY$4,000
MOREHEAD STATE UNIVERSITY$2,000
MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY$2,000
MIDWAY UNIVERSITY$2,000
WESTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY$2,000
KENTUCKY COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE SYSTEM$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 83% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $2k → 17%TROY UNIVERSITY: $2k → 27%WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%IVY TECH COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $4k → 10%NKDH SCHOOL OF RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGY: $2k → 12%MIDWAY UNIVERSITY: $4k → 10%GATEWAY COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $2k → 11%CAMPBELLSBURG CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $5k → 13%CENTRE COLLEGE: $2k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY: $7k → 15%JEFFERSON COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $11k → 15%EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $8k → 16%JEFFERSON COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE-CARROLLTON CAMPUS: $8k → 16%HENDERSON COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2k → 17%CAMPBELLSVILLE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 18%WESTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $8k → 18%MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 19%KENTUCKY WELDING INSTITUTE: $4k → 21%MOREHEAD STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 21%UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $2k → 25%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $2k → 17%TROY UNIVERSITY: $2k → 27%IVY TECH COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $4k → 10%MIDWAY UNIVERSITY: $2k → 10%GATEWAY COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $2k → 11%CAMPBELLSBURG CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $4k → 13%CENTRE COLLEGE: $2k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY: $6k → 15%JEFFERSON COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $10k → 15%EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $7k → 16%CAMPBELLSVILLE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 18%WESTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $6k → 18%MOREHEAD STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 21%IVY TECH COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $5k → 10%MIDWAY UNIVERSITY: $2k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY: $4k → 15%JEFFERSON COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $8k → 15%EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $6k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY: $4k → 15%JEFFERSON COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $7k → 15%EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $6k → 16%JEFFERSON COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $6k → 15%EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $6k → 16%JEFFERSON COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $6k → 15%EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $6k → 16%JEFFERSON COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $6k → 15%EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $4k → 16%MEDQUEST COLLEGE: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$285k · 20 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
8

Total granted

$285k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+22%

Still filing today

25%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    MIDWAY UNIVERSITY INC FKA MIDWAY COLLEGE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $8k · revenue +15%
  • SU
    SPALDING UNIVERSITY INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $4k · revenue +4%
  • CC
    CENTRE COLLEGE
    2× · 2018–2019 · $4k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • JC
    JEFFERSON COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE-CARROLLTON CAMPUS
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • KW
    KENTUCKY WELDING INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
  • BC
    BLUEGRASS COMMUNITY TECHNICAL COLLEGE
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Excelsior University

Excelsior University provides educational opportunity to adult learners with an emphasis on those historically underrepresented in higher education. The University meets students where they are - academically and geographically, offering…

Education
2
Mcdaniel College Inc

Students are the focus at mcdaniel and providing the ideal learning environment is our goal.

Education
3
Albright College

Promoting a commitment to lifelong learning with a foundation in the liberal arts.

Education
4
Simpson College

A residential, coeducation, undergraduate liberal arts college.

Education
5
Macalester College

Macalester is a four-year highly-selective liberal arts college.

Education
6
Lehigh University

Lehigh university strives to earn international prominence as a universty of special distinction and provide students with opportunities for success through its integration of teaching, research and service to society.

Education
7
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
8
Carleton College

To provide an exceptional undergraduate liberal arts education.

Education
9
Doane University

Doane university creates distinctive educational experiences, immersed in the liberal arts, to prepare our students for careers and lives grounded in inquiry, ethics, and a commitment to lead and serve in the global community.

Education
10
Calvin University

To equip students to think deeply, to act justly, and to live wholeheartedly as christ's agents of renewal in the world. calvin university is a christian academic community dedicated to rigorous intellectual inquiry. students study the…

Education
11
Brevard College Corporation

To provide an experiential liberal arts education.

Education
12
Greenville College

To transform students for lives of character and service through a christ-centered education.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Campbellsville University Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Sullivan University System. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEFFERSON COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $61,000 · OtherJEFFERSON COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGEEASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $45,000 · OtherEASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY: $29,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKYNORTHERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $22,000 · OtherNORTHERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITYWESTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · OtherWESTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITYIVY TECH COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $19,000 · OtherIVY TECH COMMUNITY COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE: $17,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLEMOREHEAD STATE UNIVERSITY: $14,000 · Other+16 more: $59,400 · Other+16 moreMIDWAY UNIVERSITY INC FKA MIDWAY COLLEGE: $8,000 · EducationMIDWAY UN…SPALDING UNIVERSITY INC: $4,000 · EducationSPALDING …CENTRE COLLEGE: $4,000 · EducationCENTRE CO…BELLARMINE UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED: $4,000 · EducationBELLARMIN…Campbellsville University Inc: $4,000 · EducationCampbells…UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $2,000 · EducationUNIVERSIT…
Other$286,400Education$26,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMIDWAY UNIVERSITY INC FKA MIDWAY COLLEGE: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPALDING UNIVERSITY INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE COLLEGE: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBELLARMINE UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCampbellsville University Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MIDWAY UNIVERSITY INC FKA MIDWAY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SPALDING UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BELLARMINE UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Campbellsville University Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pendleton Sara J Char Tr-MainMO15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pendleton Sara J Char Tr-Main · John B & Brownie Young Memorial Fund · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Raymond & Mary D Barnett Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Raymond & Mary D Barnett Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Raymond & Mary D Barnett Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Raymond & Mary D Barnett Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Raymond & Mary D Barnett’s filings →

    More from the funding graph