Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Pendleton Sara J Char Tr-Main

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$640k
Granted FY2025still arriving
46
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Education$2.4MPhilanthropy$150kOther$0
02FY2025 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$10.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPALDING UNIVERSITY$15,000
SPALDING UNIVERSITY$15,000
SPALDING UNIVERSITY$15,000
UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE$15,000
UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE$15,000
SPALDING UNIVERSITY$15,000
GALEN COLLEGE OF NURSING$15,000
MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY$15,000
UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE$15,000
SPALDING UNIVERSITY$15,000
BELLARMINE UNIVERSITY$15,000
UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE$15,000
UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE$15,000
SPALDING UNIVERSITY$15,000
NORTHERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 93% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%UNIVERISTY OF TENNESSEE COLLEGE OF PHARM: $10k → 14%MARSHALL UNIVERSITY: $15k → 19%APPALACHIAN COLLEGE OF PHARMACY: $15k → 27%MIDWAY UNIVERSITY: $15k → 10%ELIZABETHTOWN COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLL: $10k → 13%OWENSBORO COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $10k → 13%GALEN COLLEGE OF NURSING: $15k → 15%EASTERN KENTYCKY UNIVERSITY: $15k → 16%SOUTHCENTRAL KENTUCKY COMMUNITY & TECH: $10k → 17%SOUTHCENTRAL KENTUCKY COMMUNITY & TECHNI: $10k → 18%MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 19%LINDSEY WILSON COLLEGE: $15k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $15k → 25%SOUTHEAST KENTUCKY COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL: $10k → 27%HAZARD COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $10k → 27%MIDWAY UNIVERSITY: $15k → 10%OWENSBORO COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $10k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $150k → 15%EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $15k → 16%SOUTHCENTRAL KENTUCKY COMMUNITY & TECH: $10k → 17%MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $15k → 25%MIDWAY UNIVERSITY: $15k → 10%BELLARMINE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 15%EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $15k → 16%MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $15k → 25%SPALDING UNIVERSITY: $15k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $15k → 25%SPALDING UNIVERSITY: $15k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $15k → 25%SPALDING UNIVERSITY: $15k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $15k → 25%SPALDING UNIVERSITY: $15k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $15k → 25%SPALDING UNIVERSITY: $15k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $15k → 25%SPALDING UNIVERSITY: $15k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $15k → 25%SPALDING UNIVERSITY: $15k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $15k → 25%SPALDING UNIVERSITY: $15k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $15k → 25%UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE: $10k → 25%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$948k · 12 repeat orgs$468k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
7

Total granted

$948k
$358k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
+13%

Still filing today

42%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $302k · revenue +8%
  • SU
    SPALDING UNIVERSITY INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $220k · revenue -15%
  • MS
    MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $85k

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $150k · revenue +13%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY PHILANTHROPY
    one grant, 2021 · $150k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY
    one grant, 2024 · $30k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

3
Mcdaniel College Inc

Mcdaniel college is a diverse student-centered community committed to excellence in the liberal arts & sciences and professional studies with careful mentoring and attention to the individual. mcdaniel changes lives. we challenge students…

Education
4
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
5
Linfield University

Linfield university advances a vision of learning, life, and community that promotes intellectual challenge and creativity, values both theoretical and practical knowledge, engages thoughtful dialogue in a climate of mutual respect and…

Education
6
Coker University

Coker university is a student-centered, comprehensive university. it is dedicated to providing every student an academic curriculum based upon a uniformly excellent liberal arts core that enhances the structured development of key personal…

Education
7
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
8
Lindenwood Education System

Real experience. real success.enhancing lives through quality education and professional preparatory experiences. see schedule o.values:we put our students first. we have an unwavering commitment to providing the highest quality education,…

Education
9
Bradley University

Bradley university empowers students for immediate and sustained success in their personal and professional endeavors by combining professional preparation, liberal arts and sciences, and co-curricular experiences. alongside our dedication…

Education
10
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
11
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
12
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Campbellsville University Inc and the most unlike its peers is Appalachian College of Pharmacy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE — $302,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLESPALDING UNIVERSITY INC — $220,000 · EducationSPALDING UNIVERSITY INCUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC — $150,436 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INCMIDWAY UNIVERSITY INC FKA MIDWAY COLLEGE — $69,000 · EducationMIDWAY UNIVERSITY INC FKA MIDWAY COLLEGE+4 more — $69,000 · Education+4 moreUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY PHILANTHROPY — $150,436 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY PHILANTHROPYMURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY — $85,000 · OtherMURRAY STATE UNIVERSITYSOUTHCENTRAL KENTUCKY COMMUNITY & TECH — $68,000 · OtherSOUTHCENTRAL KENTUCKY COMMUNITY & TECHEASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY — $50,000 · OtherEASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITYNORTHERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY — $40,000 · OtherNORTHERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITYMARSHALL UNIVERSITY — $35,000 · OtherMARSHALL UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY — $30,000 · Other+12 more — $147,000 · Other+12 more
Education$810,436Other$605,436

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE — $302,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSPALDING UNIVERSITY INC — $220,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC — $150,436 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMIDWAY UNIVERSITY INC FKA MIDWAY COLLEGE — $69,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAPPALACHIAN COLLEGE OF PHARMACY — $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBELLARMINE UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED — $22,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLINDSEY WILSON UNIVERSITY INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCampbellsville University Inc — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PIKEVILLE
  • Who funds SPALDING UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MIDWAY UNIVERSITY INC FKA MIDWAY COLLEGE
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN COLLEGE OF PHARMACY
  • Who funds BELLARMINE UNIVERSITY INCORPORATED
  • Who funds LINDSEY WILSON UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds Campbellsville University Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John B & Brownie Young Memorial FundKY17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John B & Brownie Young Memorial Fund · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · Raymond & Mary D Barnett Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Woldenberg Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pendleton Sara J Char Tr-Main funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph