Skip to content

· Private foundation

Raymond A & Gertrude D Hyer Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$320k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$2.3MEducation$2.1MHealth$2.1MYouth Development$1.0MRecreation & Sports$710kFood & Nutrition$191kCivil Rights$137kArts & Culture$105kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $458k
  • $250k+3 grants · $900k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$22M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KINGS DAUGHTERS CHILD CARE CENTER$320,000
OGLEBAY FOUNDATION$305,000
WHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC$275,000
WHEELING CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCH$170,000
WEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$128,000
HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER$100,000
HOH SHARE$60,000
MADISON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL$15,000
WOODSDALE BASEBALL SOFTBALL ASSOC$10,000
SHRINERS CHILDREN HOSPITALS$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
FRIENDS OF WHEELING$5,000
DRY RIDGE COMMUNITY CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 3% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS INC: $15k → 17%FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS INC: $12k → 17%OHIO VALLEY RECOVERY INC: $7k → 18%FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS INC: $2k → 17%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEMS: $200k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEMS: $120k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $100k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $100k → 15%HELPING HEROES INC: $100k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $86k → 15%HOH SHARE: $60k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEMS: $55k → 15%OHIO VALLEY RECOVERY INC: $50k → 15%OHIO VALLEY RECOVERY INC: $48k → 15%HOH SHARE INC: $45k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEMS: $44k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEMS: $25k → 15%HOH SHARES INC: $25k → 15%OHIO VALLEY RECOVERY INC: $25k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $15k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM: $10k → 15%HOH SHARE: $7k → 15%FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS: $4k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 13% of Raymond A & Gertrude D Hyer Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in WV; by stated purpose, 85%.

Raymond A & Gertrude D Hyer Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.0M · 25 repeat orgs$993k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
28

Total granted

$8.0M
$830k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
-7%

Still filing today

64%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $163k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationEnvironmentEmploymentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WH
    WHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +24%
  • TK
    THE KING'S DAUGHTERS CHILD CARE CENTERS INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +93%
  • OF
    OGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $665k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA NORTHERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $150k · revenue +67% · 53% of their budget
  • HH
    HELPING HEROES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -7%
  • TU
    THE UNITY CENTER OHIO VALLEY RECOVERY
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ohio Valley Goodwill Industries

The mission of ohio valley goodwill industries rehabilitation center, inc. is to provide vocational rehabilitation, training, and employment services to individuals with either disabilities or social and economic barriers to full employment

—
2
Westchester Institute for Human Development

The westchester institute for human development (wihd) creates better futures for people with disabilities, for vulnerable children, and for their families and caregivers. wihd accomplishes its mission through professional education,…

Health
3
Hospice Care Corporation D/B/a West Virginia Caring

To improve care for those facing life-limiting illness through direct support of patients and their families, public education and public advocacy.

—
4
West Virginia Paralyzed Veterans of America Inc

Paralyzed veterans of america, a congressionally chartered veterans service organization founded in 1946, has developed a unique expertise on a wide variety of issues involving the special needs of our members, veterans of the armed forces…

—
5
Wheeling Forward Inc

The organization's mission is to provide guidance and resources to disabled individuals with a focus on educational attainment, employment procurement, health and wellness, community integration, recreation, housing acquisition, and…

Human Services
6
Work Opportunity Center Inc

Provide basic skills and work training for handicapped individuals.

Employment
7
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
8
The Childrens Home of Wheeling Inc

To provide care to childen and their families through a range of services that promote healthy growth and improve the quality of family life

Human Services
9
Society for Handicapped Citizens of Medina County Inc

To provide residential care and services to handicapped citizens of northern ohio.

—
10
Southeastern Ohio Center for Independent Living

Provide services to people with disabilities. such services include assistance with housing, employment, transportation and recreational issues.

Human Services
11
Hospice of Southern West Virginia Inc

To serve the needs of individuals suffering from life-limiting illness as well as to serve the individuals caring for them. to place emphasis on comfort and quality of life while fulfilling the physical, psychological, social and spiritual…

—
12
Waynesburg University

Waynesburg university educates students to make connections between faith, learning and serving so they might faithfully transofrm their communiities and the world. see continuation on schedule o.as a christian comprehensive university, we…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wheeling Health Right Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wheeling Symphony Orchestra. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
17/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE KING'S DAUGHTERS CHILD CARE CENTERS INC: $1,475,000 · OtherTHE KING'S DAUGHTERS CHILD CARE CENTERS INCCENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $779,495 · OtherCENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOLHOUSE OF CARPENTER: $570,000 · OtherHOUSE OF CARPENTERWHEELING CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCH: $526,000 · OtherWHEELING CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHYWCA: $339,000 · OtherYWCAMADISON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $201,000 · OtherTHE SOUP KITCHEN OF GREATER WHEELING INC: $187,500 · Other+35 more: $1,100,250 · Other+35 moreWHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC: $1,711,000 · HealthWHEELING HEALTH RIGHT …+2 more: $53,000 · HealthYOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $453,850 · Human ServicesYOUTH SERVICES…THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC: $301,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOUSE OF T…HOH SHARE INC: $137,000 · Human ServicesHOH SHARE INCOHIO VALLEY RECOVERY INC: $130,000 · Human ServicesOHIO VALLEY RE…HELPING HEROES INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesHELPING HEROES…+1 more: $32,500 · Human ServicesOGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC: $665,000 · Recreation & SportsWEST VIRGINIA NORTHERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 · EducationWHEELING JESUIT UNIVERSITY INC: $50,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationOGLEBAY INSTITUTE: $50,000 · EnvironmentSEEING HAND ASSOCIATION INC: $25,000 · EmploymentCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY INC: $25,000 · Philanthropy
Other$5,178,245Health$1,764,000Human Services$1,154,350Recreation & Sports$665,000Education$205,000Environment$50,000Employment$25,000Philanthropy$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC: $1,711,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetTHE KING'S DAUGHTERS CHILD CARE CENTERS INC: $1,475,000 over 7y, 23% of budgetOGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC: $665,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC: $453,850 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetTHE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC: $301,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetTHE SOUP KITCHEN OF GREATER WHEELING INC: $187,500 over 5y, 13% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA NORTHERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 over 1y, 53% of budgetHOH SHARE INC: $137,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetOHIO VALLEY RECOVERY INC: $130,000 over 4y, 38% of budgetWEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $128,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE - UPPER OHIO VALLEY INC: $115,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetHELPING HEROES INC: $100,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetLAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTER: $60,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetWHEELING JESUIT UNIVERSITY INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOGLEBAY INSTITUTE: $50,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL INC: $40,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetNAMI OF GREATER WHEELING INC: $33,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetFAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS INC: $32,500 over 4y, 8.6% of budgetWHEELING SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $25,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetSEEING HAND ASSOCIATION INC: $25,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF WHEELING INC: $20,000 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE KING'S DAUGHTERS CHILD CARE CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds OGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SOUP KITCHEN OF GREATER WHEELING INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA NORTHERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOH SHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds OHIO VALLEY RECOVERY INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE - UPPER OHIO VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HEROES INC ↗
  • Who funds LAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WHEELING JESUIT UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds OGLEBAY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL INC ↗
  • Who funds NAMI OF GREATER WHEELING INC ↗
  • Who funds FAITH IN ACTION CAREGIVERS INC ↗
  • Who funds WHEELING SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds SEEING HAND ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF WHEELING INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley IncWV40.8× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley Inc · August J & Thelma S Hoffmann Foundation · Albert Schenk III & Kathleen H Schenk Charitable Trust · Hess Family Foundation · Stamp 2001 Charitable Fund · Francis J and Edith Jackson Founda Security National Trust Company · Rosemary M Front Charitable Trust · James B Chambers Memorial · Robert L& Helen E Levenson Family Charitable Tr · The Driehorst Family Foundation · Elizabeth Stifel Kline Foundation · The Banford & Terri Exley Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Raymond A & Gertrude D Hyer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Raymond A & Gertrude D Hyer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Raymond A & Gertrude D Hyer Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Raymond A & Gertrude D Hyer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Raymond A & Gertrude D Hyer’s filings →

More from the funding graph