Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

James B Chambers Memorial

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$575k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$167k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Recreation & Sports$907kHuman Services$889kPhilanthropy$745kYouth Development$624kArts & Culture$489kEducation$480kFood & Nutrition$235kReligion$158kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $57k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $500k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KINGS DAUGHTERS$166,667
YMCA$97,692
UNITED WAY$75,000
OGLEBAY INSTITUTE$60,000
HOLY FAMILY DAYCARE$50,500
BETHLEHEM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$50,000
MIDDLE CREEK SCHOOL$30,000
HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER$15,000
YOUNG LIFE$12,000
ARC$5,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL$5,000
COMMUNITY IMPACT NETWORK$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $954k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $126k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM: $113k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $112k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM: $107k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $70k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $70k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM: $65k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM: $59k → 15%HOH SHARE: $37k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $36k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $25k → 15%HOH SHARE: $25k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $24k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM: $15k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM: $15k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER: $15k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $11k → 15%COMMUNITY IMPACT NETWORK: $10k → 15%HOH SHARE: $10k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $5k → 15%COMMUNITY IMPACT NETWORK: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.6M · 28 repeat orgs$468k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.

28 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
10

Total granted

$3.6M
$262k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+2%

Still filing today

39%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $206k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsEnvironmentPhilanthropyEmploymentFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $478k · revenue +48%
  • OF
    OGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2017–2023 · $373k · revenue +284%
  • YS
    YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $373k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • OP
    ORCHARD PARK HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • HF
    HOLY FAMILY CHILD CARE
    one grant, 2022 · $49k
  • CF
    CRITTENTON FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $42k · revenue +2%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
2
The Childrens Home of Wheeling Inc

To provide care to childen and their families through a range of services that promote healthy growth and improve the quality of family life

Human Services
3
Child Development Center of Central Wv Inc

Provide childd care services and preschool for children birth to age 12

Education
4
Communityworks in West Virginia Inc

Communityworks in west virignia (cwwv) creates housing and community development solutions for all west virginians through a network of member organizations. cwwv carries out its mission by providing effective training and technical…

Housing & Shelter
5
Housing Development Corporation

Promote and advance decent, safe and sanitary housing for persons of low and moderate income, the elderly, disadvantaged or infirm, in the cabell- wayne counties and surrounding metropolitan area of west virginia.

Housing & Shelter
6
Carriage House Children's Center Inc

The primary purpose of the organization is to provide structured day care programs for pre-school children. the organization is dedicated to the nurturing, care and education of infants, toddlers, and pre-school children. the center owns…

Human Services
7
Oberlin Early Childhood Center

The organization operates a childhood center in oberlin, ohio for up tp 100 children ages six weeks to five years old. the center provides a unique, child centered campus for anyone in need regardless of financial ability.

Human Services
8
Human Resources Center Inc

Services to challenged individuals in Vocational,Residential, Home Based, and Community settings.

Human Services
9
Central West Virginia Aging Services Inc

Provide homemaker and case management services to home-bound seniors and disabled members in west virginia. provide, also, training and job assistance to those 55 and older on a limited income.

Human Services
10
Our Jobs Our Children Our Future Inc

Bringing industry and new businesses to the tri-state area, particularly huntington, west virginia.

Community Improvement
11
Carroll Hills Industries Inc

Vocational habilitation center providing programs for individuals with developmental disabilities.

Employment
12
Ohio Valley Goodwill Industries

The mission of ohio valley goodwill industries rehabilitation center, inc. is to provide vocational rehabilitation, training, and employment services to individuals with either disabilities or social and economic barriers to full employment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crittenton Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hoh Share Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
13/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

YMCA — $445,219 · OtherYMCAOHIO COUNTY SCHOOLS — $253,000 · OtherOHIO COUNTY SCHOOLSKINGS DAUGHTERS — $196,667 · OtherKINGS DAUGHTERSIndividual grant recipient — $166,434 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTER — $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $87,000 · OtherYOUNG LIFE — $84,000 · OtherUNITED WAY — $75,000 · Other+23 more — $766,475 · Other+23 moreTHE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC — $477,950 · Human ServicesTHE HOUSE OF THE CARPE…YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC — $373,334 · Human ServicesYOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM …HOH SHARE INC — $72,000 · Human ServicesHOH SHARE INC+2 more — $30,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY INC — $669,594 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDA…CRITTENTON FOUNDATION INC — $42,181 · PhilanthropyCRITTENTON FOUND…OGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC — $373,346 · Recreation & SportsOGLEBAY INSTITUTE — $311,745 · EnvironmentGROW OHIO VALLEY INC — $158,000 · Food & NutritionWHEELING COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $79,500 · EducationSEEING HAND ASSOCIATION INC — $8,000 · Employment
Other$2,173,795Human Services$953,784Philanthropy$711,775Recreation & Sports$373,346Environment$311,745Food & Nutrition$158,000Education$79,500Employment$8,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY INC — $669,594 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetTHE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC — $477,950 over 8y, 11% of budgetOGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC — $373,346 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC — $373,334 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetOGLEBAY INSTITUTE — $311,745 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetGROW OHIO VALLEY INC — $158,000 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetLAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTER — $100,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetWHEELING COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $79,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetHOH SHARE INC — $72,000 over 3y, 9.2% of budgetCRITTENTON FOUNDATION INC — $42,181 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC — $15,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY IMPACT NETWORK INC — $15,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE OHIO VALLEY INC
  • Who funds THE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC
  • Who funds OGLEBAY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds YOUTH SERVICES SYSTEM INC
  • Who funds OGLEBAY INSTITUTE
  • Who funds GROW OHIO VALLEY INC
  • Who funds LAUGHLIN COMMUNITY CENTER
  • Who funds WHEELING COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL
  • Who funds HOH SHARE INC
  • Who funds CRITTENTON FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY IMPACT NETWORK INC
  • Who funds SEEING HAND ASSOCIATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley IncWV30.4× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley Inc · Raymond A & Gertrude D Hyer Foundation · Hess Family Foundation · August J & Thelma S Hoffmann Foundation · Albert Schenk III & Kathleen H Schenk Charitable Trust · Elizabeth Stifel Kline Foundation · Helen J Prince Foundation Security National Trust Co Trustee · Robinson S Parlin Trust · Bernard McDonough Foundation Inc · Rosemary M Front Charitable Trust · W E Stone Foundation · Vna Home Support Services Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization James B Chambers Memorial funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to James B Chambers Memorial?

    Find your warmest path to James B Chambers Memorial through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph