Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ray Solem Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$90k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$285kHuman Services$169kCivil Rights$78kHousing & Shelter$65kEducation$40kInternational$30kArts & Culture$20kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $80k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$25,000
Restoration Immigration Legal Ai$25,000
Mabel Center$10,000
Brave House$10,000
Beyond 90$10,000
GA Immigration Asylum Network$5,000
Crossing Point Arts$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $115k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GenerateHope Inc: $5k → 11%Gateway Human Trafficking: $10k → 11%Intercambio Uniting Communities: $100k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
AR
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$328k · 13 repeat orgs$379k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
31

Total granted

$328k
$379k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-11%
+86%

Still filing today

38%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCivil RightsCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentInternationalReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNITED WE DREAM NETWORK INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $48k · revenue -30%
  • RI
    RESTORATION IMMIGRATION LEGAL AID
    3× · 2023–2025 · $45k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2024–2025 · $35k

Funded once

  • ID
    INTERCAMBIO DE COMUNIDADES
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -7%
  • AL
    Arizona Legal Women and Youth Servi
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • L
    LIFE-SPANgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +46%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asylum Seeker Network of Support
—
2
Vida Legal Assistance Inc

VIDA mainly represents immigrant survivors of violent crimes particularly domestic violence sexual assault abuse and trafficking in persons modern-day slavery forced labor.

Crime & Legal
3
Casa de Esperanza

Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…

Human Services
4
Importa Santa Barbara

IMPORTA Santa Barbara was founded in 2011 as an organization dedicated to providing services for Santa Barbara County's large population of low-income immigrants. In 2012, the organization decided to focus on providing immigration legal…

Public Benefit
5
Southern California Immigration Project

Southern California Immigration Project is a public interest nonprofit organization dedicated to providing pro bono legal services to survivors of human and civil rights violations.

International
6
Thrive International

Our Mission is to Empower Multicultural Communities to THRIVE.

Human Services
7
Advocates for Immigrant Survivors

AIS's mission is to provide immigration legal services and social services to aid survivors in accessing the rights to justice, dignity, and restoration.

Human Services
8
Ayuda Inc

Ayuda's mission is to advocate for low-income immigrants through direct legal, social and language services, training and outreach in washington, d.c., maryland, and virginia. we envision a community where all immigrants succeed and thrive…

Human Services
9
Detention Watch Network

Detention Watch Network seeks to end the cruel system of immigration detention via programs of grassroots organizing, strategic communications, and collective advocacy.

Human Services
10
Christian Immigration Advocacy Cent

Provide high-quality legal services in a compassionate, incarnational, and culturally-appropriate way and empower churches to serve their sojourner neighbors well through collaborative partnerships.

Human Services
11
Immigrant Legal Services

Provide low bono & pro bono legal immigration services.

Human Services
12
Immigrants Rising

We empower people to achieve their educational and career goals through personal, institutional and policy transformation.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Brave House Inc; the most unlike its peers is Worcester Youth Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RESTORATION IMMIGRATION LEGAL AID: $45,000 · OtherRESTORATION IMMIGRATION LEGAL AIDIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTutor English to Advance Change: $20,000 · OtherCathedral of the Incarnation: $20,000 · OtherEl Centro Hispano: $20,000 · OtherMabel Center: $20,000 · OtherCROSSING POINT ARTS INC: $20,000 · Other+22 more: $209,000 · Other+22 moreINTERCAMBIO DE COMUNIDADES: $100,000 · Human ServicesINTERCAMBIO DE COMUNIDA…CENTREVILLE IMMIGRATION FORUM: $20,000 · Human ServicesCENTREVILLE IMMIGRATION…GATEWAY ALLIANCE AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING: $10,000 · Human ServicesGATEWAY ALLIANCE AGAINS…Casa De Paz: $10,000 · Human ServicesCasa De PazGENERATEHOPE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesUNITED WE DREAM NETWORK INC: $48,000 · Civil RightsUNITED WE DR…BRAVE HOUSE INC: $20,000 · Civil RightsBRAVE HOUSE …IMMIGRANT HOPE - ATLANTA INC: $10,000 · Civil RightsIMMIGRANT HO…COMMUNITY ASYLUM SEEKERS PROJECT INC: $30,000 · InternationalLIFE-SPAN: $10,000 · Crime & LegalJustice For All Immigrants: $10,000 · Crime & LegalGEORGIA ASYLUM & IMMIGRATION NETWORK INC: $10,000 · Crime & LegalBEYOND 90 INC: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterWORCESTER YOUTH CENTER INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentROCA INC: $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$389,000Human Services$145,000Civil Rights$78,000International$30,000Crime & Legal$30,000Housing & Shelter$20,000Youth Development$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTERCAMBIO DE COMUNIDADES: $100,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetUNITED WE DREAM NETWORK INC: $48,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ASYLUM SEEKERS PROJECT INC: $30,000 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetBRAVE HOUSE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetBEYOND 90 INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetThe Haven Project Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetWORCESTER YOUTH CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetJustice For All Immigrants: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSOCCER WITHOUT BORDERS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGATEWAY ALLIANCE AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetMARGIE'S HAVEN HOUSE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetGEORGIA ASYLUM & IMMIGRATION NETWORK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCasa De Paz: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetIMMIGRANT HOPE - ATLANTA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetNISWA ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetJosephine's Place Inc: $9,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetROCA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL LANGUAGE INSTITUTE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGENERATEHOPE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTERCAMBIO DE COMUNIDADES ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WE DREAM NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ASYLUM SEEKERS PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTREVILLE IMMIGRATION FORUM ↗
  • Who funds BRAVE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND 90 INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFE-SPAN ↗
  • Who funds The Haven Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds WORCESTER YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Justice For All Immigrants ↗
  • Who funds SOCCER WITHOUT BORDERS ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY ALLIANCE AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING ↗
  • Who funds MARGIE'S HAVEN HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA ASYLUM & IMMIGRATION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Casa De Paz ↗
  • Who funds IMMIGRANT HOPE - ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds NISWA ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Josephine's Place Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC5.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ray Solem Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ray Solem Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 78%
  • Roca Inc: 78% of income from government
  • Worcester Youth Center Inc: 64% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ray Solem Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ray Solem Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ray Solem’s filings →

More from the funding graph