Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ray M & Jane R Wright Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$614k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$170k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$3.3MEducation$2.1MArts & Culture$1.4MRecreation & Sports$190kPhilanthropy$157kHuman Services$147kYouth Development$126kHealth$124kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $220k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $361k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRACE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$170,000
ST LUKE$100,000
AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$91,000
SHADES VALLEY COMMUNITY CHURCH$45,000
SAFEHOUSE MINISTRIES OF CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY MINISTRY$45,000
THE COLUMBUS MUSEUM$17,500
1909 PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC$11,500
PIEDMONT COLUMBUS REGIONAL FOUNDATION$11,000
PASTORAL INSTITUTE$10,000
ANDREW COLLEGE$10,000
COLUMBUS TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION$10,000
GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$10,000
PAWS HUMANE SOCIETY$10,000
SPRINGER OPERA HOUSE$10,000
RIVERCENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNITEUS: $10k → 15%UNITE US: $6k → 15%TAKE THE CITY: $20k → 18%TAKE THE CITY: $10k → 18%TAKE THE CITY: $5k → 18%TAKE THE CITY: $5k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
VA
AZ
TN
NC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.7M · 41 repeat orgs$143k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

41 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
12

Total granted

$7.7M
$125k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
0%

Still filing today

51%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHealthReligionYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AU
    AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +51%
  • AC
    ANDREW COLLEGE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $212k · revenue +58%
  • HC
    HISTORIC COLUMBUS FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $165k · revenue +449%

Funded once

  • NC
    NATIONAL CIVIL WAR NAVAL MUSEUM
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • MC
    MY CHURCH OF COLUMBUS
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • MO
    M2540 OF COLUMBUS
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
2
Trinity Christian Fellowship Inc

Gospel mission

Religion
3
Thomas University

Thomas university is an independent, not for profit, institution of higher education with undergraduate and graduate programs that prepare students for successful careers and responsible citizenship in a rapidly changing and complex world.

Education
4
Toccoa Falls College Inc

The mission of Toccoa Falls College is to glorify God through seeking and developing Christian servant leaders who will impact their world with the love and message of Jesus Christ.

Education
5
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

—
6
Financial Planning Ministry

Financial planning ministry, inc. (fpm) is a not-for-profit organization devoted to assisting in the performance of the functions of christian churches by serving their financial needs.

Health
7
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
8
Hood Theological Seminary

Educational institution

Education
9
Family of Faith Christian University a Corporation

Family of faith christian university was founded by the decree of the holy spirit for the purpose of educating, discipling, and training laborers for the kingdom of god.

Education
10
Mid-Atlantic Christian University

Mid-atlantic christian university is an undergraduate institution of christian higher learning whose mission is to impact the world by transforming ordinary people into extraordinary christian leaders. students are taught to think…

Education
11
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
12
Trevecca Nazarene University

Trevecca nazarene university is a private, co-educational, christian liberal arts university. the university exists to carry out the educational mission of the church by means of academic programs that promote scholarship, critical…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pastoral Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Wynn House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
16/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GRACE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $3,687,950 · OtherGRACE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHST LUKE: $280,000 · OtherSAFEHOUSE MINISTRIES OF CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY MINISTRY: $195,000 · Other+39 more: $1,278,750 · Other+39 moreAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,596,000 · EducationAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIO…ANDREW COLLEGE: $212,000 · EducationANDREW COLLEGEGeorgia Southern University Foundation Inc: $75,000 · Education+1 more: $2,500 · EducationTHE COLUMBUS MUSEUM INC: $127,500 · Arts & CultureSPRINGER OPERA HOUSE ARTS ASSOCIATIONINC: $50,000 · Arts & Culture1909 PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC: $24,000 · Arts & CultureVALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $100,000 · Housing & ShelterST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $39,000 · HealthTWIN CEDARS YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $30,000 · HealthALL THINGS PCB OUTREACH: $5,000 · HealthBRUCE PEARL FAMILY FOUNDATION: $52,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY INC: $15,000 · PhilanthropyTAKE THE CITY INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesUNITEUS INC: $16,000 · Human Services
Other$5,441,700Education$1,885,500Arts & Culture$201,500Housing & Shelter$100,000Health$74,000Philanthropy$67,500Human Services$56,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,596,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetANDREW COLLEGE: $212,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetHISTORIC COLUMBUS FOUNDATION INC: $165,000 over 8y, 4.7% of budgetTHE COLUMBUS MUSEUM INC: $127,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE WYNN HOUSE INC: $120,000 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetVALLEY RESCUE MISSION: $100,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetPASTORAL INSTITUTE INC: $88,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetGeorgia Southern University Foundation Inc: $75,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBRUCE PEARL FAMILY FOUNDATION: $52,500 over 5y, 6.5% of budgetSPRINGER OPERA HOUSE ARTS ASSOCIATIONINC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetCOLUMBUS TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetTAKE THE CITY INC: $40,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $39,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTEEN ADVISORS INC: $32,500 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetTWIN CEDARS YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding the Valley Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget1909 PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC: $24,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $20,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOOD MILL: $17,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetUNITEUS INC: $16,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALL THINGS PCB OUTREACH: $5,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFrontier Alliance International Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ANDREW COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds HISTORIC COLUMBUS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COLUMBUS MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WYNN HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds PASTORAL INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds Georgia Southern University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds BRUCE PEARL FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGER OPERA HOUSE ARTS ASSOCIATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TAKE THE CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds TEEN ADVISORS INC ↗
  • Who funds TWIN CEDARS YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding the Valley Inc ↗
  • Who funds 1909 PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD MILL ↗
  • Who funds UNITEUS INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE CHATTAHOOCHEE VALLEY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Chattahoochee Valley IncGA40.2× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Chattahoochee Valley Inc · Lockwood Partners Foundation Inc · Bradley-Turner Foundation Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Beloco Foundation Inc · Mildred Miller Fort Foundation Inc · The Jordan Foundation Inc · The Daniel P Amos Family Foundation · McClure Family Foundation Inc Co Truist Foundations & Endowments Spec · Gb & Ca Saunders Foundation Inc · Jw & Ethel I Woodruff Foundation Inc · Jackson-Burgin Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ray M & Jane R Wright Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ray M & Jane R Wright Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ray M & Jane R Wright Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Ray M & Jane R Wright Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ray M & Jane R Wright’s filings →

    More from the funding graph