Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ray Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$442k
Granted FY2023
14
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Education$3.5MAnimals$971kYouth Development$669kCrime & Legal$343kFood & Nutrition$314kHuman Services$232kHousing & Shelter$167kEnvironment$83kOther$0
02FY2023 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k13 grants · $382k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$33,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LARIMER COUNTY PARTNERS INC$60,000
THE GREELEY DREAM TEAM$45,000
SEXUAL ASSAULT VICTIM ADVOCATE CENTER$40,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WELD COUNTY$40,000
ANIMAL FRIENDS ALLIANCE$35,357
HOMEWARD ALLIANCE INC$33,000
PROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY$33,000
WELD FOOD BANK$33,000
FOOD BANK FOR LARIMER COUNTY$33,000
COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE INC$22,500
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF LARIMER COUNTY$21,480
COLORADO YOUTH OUTDOORS$20,700
FINALLY HOME$15,000
CHILDSAFE COLORADO INC$10,320
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $121k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LIVE THE VICTORY INC: $53k → 11%HOMEWARD ALLIANCE INC: $33k → 11%LIVE THE VICTORY INC: $25k → 11%HOMELESS GEAR INC: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 55% of Ray Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in CO; read by stated purpose it is 49% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Ray Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.3M · 16 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
2

Total granted

$6.3M
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+124%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesAnimalsReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ANIMAL FRIENDS ALLIANCE
    5× · 2019–2023 · $951k · revenue +109%
  • LC
    LARIMER COUNTY PARTNERS DBA PARTNERS MENTORING YOUTH
    7× · 2017–2023 · $345k · revenue +78%
  • TG
    THE GREELEY DREAM TEAM INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $180k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • TW
    THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +124%
  • Care and Share Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +45%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Safehouse Denver Inc

Safehouse denver assists adult, children, and youth in reclaiming their right to a life free from domestic violence. the agency provides a broad spectrum of culturally competent, trauma-informed services, including but not limited to,…

Human Services
2
Children's Bureau Inc

Empowering individuals to build stronger families and communities.

Human Services
3
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
4
Lutheran Social Services of Colorado

Rooted in the values of kindness, dignity and social justice, lfsrm strenghtens communities by providing support, guidance, and resource coordination to individuals and families throughout the rocky mountain region.

5
Safehouse Progressive Alliance for Nonviolence Inc

To provide safe shelter, support and advocacy for adults and their children, and to provide an end to violence against adults, youth and children through support, advocacy and community organizing.

Human Services
6
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
7
The Conflict Center

The conflict center equips people with practical skills to navigate, transform and embrace everyday conflict.

Crime & Legal
8
A Shared Vision Partners in Pediatric Blindness and Visual Imp

A Shared Vision educates, inspires, and empowers families to nurture the development of their young children who are blind or visually impaired. We provide early intervention vision services in families' homes and community settings…

Health
9
Colorado Ag Water Alliance

Works with farmers and ranchers to address water issues around the state impacting agriculture.

Environment
10
La Plata Youth Services

La Plata Youth Services, Inc. supports and advocates for youth facing challenges in school, home and court.

Crime & Legal
11
Christian Family Care Agency Inc

The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on three pillars: preserve,…

Human Services
12
Colorado Dream Foundation

We partner with youth and their families as they successfully navigate school, college, and career by providing a holistic academic, social, and emotional program from elementary school through college, along with post-secondary…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Northern Colorado and the most unlike its peers is Finally Home Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
16/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $3,334,079 · EducationCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONSEXUAL ASSAULT VICTIM ADVOCATE CENTER — $160,000 · Education+1 more — $60,000 · EducationANIMAL FRIENDS ALLIANCE — $950,857 · AnimalsANIMAL FRIENDS AL…+1 more — $20,000 · AnimalsLARIMER COUNTY PARTNERS DBA PARTNERS MENTORING YOUTH — $345,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LARIMER COUNTY — $85,920 · Youth DevelopmentTHE GREELEY DREAM TEAM INC — $180,000 · OtherTHE GREELEY…THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WELD COUNTY INC — $160,000 · OtherTHE BOYS AN…COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE INC — $90,000 · OtherCOURT APPOI…CHILDSAFE COLORADO INC — $92,880 · OtherCHILDSAFE C…COLORADO YOUTH OUTDOORS CHARITABLE TRUST — $82,800 · OtherCOLORADO YO…+1 more — $20,000 · OtherThe Food Bank for Larimer County — $157,000 · Food & NutritionWELD FOOD BANK — $147,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more — $10,000 · Food & NutritionHOMEWARD ALLIANCE INC — $167,000 · Human ServicesTHE MATTHEWS HOUSE — $77,832 · Human ServicesPROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY OF NORTHERN COLORADO — $172,000 · Religion
Education$3,554,079Animals$970,857Youth Development$430,920Other$625,680Food & Nutrition$314,000Human Services$244,832Religion$172,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $3,334,079 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetANIMAL FRIENDS ALLIANCE — $950,857 over 5y, 17% of budgetLARIMER COUNTY PARTNERS DBA PARTNERS MENTORING YOUTH — $345,000 over 7y, 7.0% of budgetTHE GREELEY DREAM TEAM INC — $180,000 over 5y, 7.3% of budgetPROJECT SELF-SUFFICIENCY OF NORTHERN COLORADO — $172,000 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetHOMEWARD ALLIANCE INC — $167,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF WELD COUNTY INC — $160,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetSEXUAL ASSAULT VICTIM ADVOCATE CENTER — $160,000 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetThe Food Bank for Larimer County — $157,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetWELD FOOD BANK — $147,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDSAFE COLORADO INC — $92,880 over 6y, 6.0% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE INC — $90,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LARIMER COUNTY — $85,920 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCOLORADO YOUTH OUTDOORS CHARITABLE TRUST — $82,800 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetTHE MATTHEWS HOUSE — $77,832 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetFinally Home Foundation — $60,000 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN COLORADO — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCare and Share Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Otter Cares Foundation AKA OTTERCARES FOUNDATIONCO32.2× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Otter Cares Foundation AKA OTTERCARES FOUNDATION · Colorado Gives Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Colorado · El Pomar Foundation · Northern Colorado United for Youth · Realities for Children Charities · Don & May Wilkins Charitable Trust · United Way of Larimer County · Anschutz Family Foundation · Weld Community Foundation · Woodward Governor Charitable Trust · Nebraska Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ray Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph