Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rattray Kimura Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$151k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$677kArts & Culture$421kEmployment$95kInternational$25kAnimals$13kHealth$11kHuman Services$5kYouth Development$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $116k
$3,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$120k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASIAN CULTURAL COUNCIL$25,000
DUNHUANG FOUNDATION$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION$25,000
COLLEGIATE SCHOOL$25,000
NOGUCHI MUSEUM$16,000
MIDORI & FRIENDS$5,500
FRIENDS OF BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL$5,000
UNITE-LA$5,000
GO2 FOUNDATION FOR LUNG CANCER$5,000
MARYMOUNT SCHOOL$3,000
JAPAN SOCIETY$2,500
KENNEDY CENTER$2,500
TURN2 FOUNDATION$2,000
JAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 28%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BRONXWORKS: $5k → 28%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
IA
CT
CA
MO
DC
HI
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 17 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
26

Total granted

$1.1M
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
-5%

Still filing today

76%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationInternationalEnvironmentHealthEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ASIAN CULTURAL COUNCIL INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $261k · revenue +5%
  • COLLEGIATE SCHOOL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $203k · revenue +37%
  • US
    UC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $180k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • TA
    THE ASIA SOCIETY
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -12%
  • WC
    WALLACE COLLECTION IN AMERICA
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
2
Asian Art Museum Foundation of San Francisco

The asian art museum celebrates, preserves, and promotes asian and asian american art and cultures for local and global audiences. we provide a dynamic forum for exchanging ideas, inviting collaboration, and fueling imagination to deepen…

Arts & Culture
3
Solomon R Guggenheim Foundation

Committed to innovation, the solomon r. guggenheim foundation (the "foundation") collects, (continued on schedule o)

Arts & Culture
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
6
Berggruen Institute
Education
7
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
8
Manhattan School of Music

Manhattan school of music is deeply committed to excellence in education, performance, and creative activity; to the humanity of the school's environment; and to the cultural enrichment of the larger community. a premiere international…

Arts & Culture
9
Bard College

Bard college seeks to provide a challenging academic program and a supportive environment that fosters a collaborative interchange of ideas in the classroom as well as ambition to achieve excellence.

Education
10
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
11
The Architectural League of New York

The architectural league of new york supports critically transformative work in the allied fields that shape the built environment. as a vital, independent forum, the league stimulates thinking, debate, and action on today's (continued on…

—
12
Asia Society Texas Center

Across the fields of performing arts, visual arts, education and outreach, business & policy, astc provides insight, generates ideas, and promotes collaboration to address present challenges and create a shared future. astc operates as a…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Asian Cultural Council Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Birdlife International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
15/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLLEGIATE SCHOOL INC: $202,500 · EducationCOLLEGIATE SCHOOL INCUC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION: $180,000 · EducationUC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATIONTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $57,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE …Cornell University: $48,500 · EducationCornell University+2 more: $1,250 · EducationASIAN CULTURAL COUNCIL INC: $260,800 · InternationalASIAN CULTURAL COUNCIL IN…THE ASIA FOUNDATION: $12,500 · InternationalTHE ASIA SOCIETY: $10,000 · International+1 more: $200 · InternationalBATES COLLEGE: $141,500 · OtherBATES COLLEGEMARYMOUNT SCHOOL OF NEW YORK: $26,500 · OtherMARYMOUNT SCHOOL OF …UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ: $20,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFO…+26 more: $37,673 · Other+26 moreTHE DUNHUANG FOUNDATION INC: $92,750 · Arts & CultureTHE DUNHUANG …THE ISAMU NOGUCHI FOUNDATION AND GARDEN MUSEUM: $46,000 · Arts & CultureTHE ISAMU NOG…+6 more: $6,200 · Arts & CultureUNITE-LA INC: $95,000 · EmploymentFRIENDS OF BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL INC: $12,250 · AnimalsGO2 For Lung Cancer: $11,000 · Health+1 more: $250 · Health
Education$489,250International$283,500Other$225,673Arts & Culture$144,950Employment$95,000Animals$12,250Health$11,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASIAN CULTURAL COUNCIL INC: $260,800 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetCOLLEGIATE SCHOOL INC: $202,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetUC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION: $180,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetUNITE-LA INC: $95,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetTHE DUNHUANG FOUNDATION INC: $92,750 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $57,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $48,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ISAMU NOGUCHI FOUNDATION AND GARDEN MUSEUM: $46,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ASIA FOUNDATION: $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL INC: $12,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGO2 For Lung Cancer: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ASIA SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIDORI FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBRONXWORKS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURN 2 FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJAPAN SOCIETY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetJAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTEMISIA FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetACADEMY OF THE CITY CHARTER SCHOOL: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKATONAH MUSEUM OF ART: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCKHOUSE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEES INTERNATIONAL INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP: $32 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ASIAN CULTURAL COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGIATE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds UC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITE-LA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DUNHUANG FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds THE ISAMU NOGUCHI FOUNDATION AND GARDEN MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds THE ASIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds GO2 For Lung Cancer ↗
  • Who funds THE ASIA SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE MIDORI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BRONXWORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds TURN 2 FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JAPAN SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds GREEN SCHOOLS ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds RE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTEMISIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds ACADEMY OF THE CITY CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds KATONAH MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds ROCKHOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY17.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · The Henry Luce Foundation Inc · Bny Mellon Charitable Gift Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Ford Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rattray Kimura Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rattray Kimura Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rattray Kimura’s filings →

    More from the funding graph