Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rathburn Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$215k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$44k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$745kReligion$681kHealth$599kRecreation & Sports$297kArts & Culture$64kHuman Services$60kPhilanthropy$25kCrime & Legal$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $194k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$8.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$44,000
VIRGINIA ATHLETICS FOUNDATION$35,000
NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION - THE REAL MINISTRIES UGANDA FUND$25,000
THE ROCK CHURCH$20,000
UVA RECTORS AND VISITORS$20,000
VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF AUTISM$10,000
INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE TO IMPROVE SIGHT$10,000
CHURCH OF THE INCARNATION - HAITI MINISTRY$10,000
CHILD HEALTH PARTNERSHIP$10,000
FOOTHILLS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$10,000
THOMAS JEFFERSON FOUNDATION$6,500
MARTHA JEFFERSON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$5,000
HOSPICE OF THE PIEDMONT$5,000
THE ALS ASSOCIATION$2,000
FIRST TEE VIRGINIA BLUE RIDGE$1,226
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%THERE WITH CARE: $20k → 12%GIFT TO THERE WITH CARE: $10k → 12%PIEDMONT FAMILY YMCA: $10k → 8%PIEDMONT FAMILY YMCA: $10k → 8%PIEDMONT FAMILY YMCA: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
CA
CO
VA
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 22 repeat orgs$212k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +68% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
17

Total granted

$2.3M
$149k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+34%

Still filing today

59%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthReligionArts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GROVE CITY COLLEGE
    7× · 2017–2023 · $670k · revenue +68%
  • VI
    VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF AUTISM INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $420k · revenue +297%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $51k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • LC
    LIFEPOINT COMMUNITY CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • NC
    NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue ×103 · 44% of their budget
  • HN
    HADEN NURSING INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
2
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health
3
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
4
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
5
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
6
Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation Inc

Our mission is to expand scientific knowledge and improve public health by designing and conducting world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.

Unclassified
7
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
8
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
9
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
10
All Children's Research Institute Inc

The corporation is organized and is operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes. all children's research institute supports, encourages, and engages in and conducts medical research and other research in…

Health
11
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
12
Trihealth Physician Institute

Provides the community necessary medical care through specialty physicians.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Museum of Manhattan; the most unlike its peers is Entrega. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $473,000 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHUVA ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $197,500 · OtherUVA ATHLETIC FOUNDATIONNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION - THE REAL MINISTRIES UGANDA FUND: $50,000 · OtherFOREMAN CHRISTIAN COLLEGE: $50,000 · Other+24 more: $293,226 · Other+24 moreGROVE CITY COLLEGE: $670,000 · EducationGROVE CITY COLLEGEVIRGINIA STUDENT AID FOUNDATION INC: $95,000 · EducationVIRGINIA STUDENT AID FOUNDATION IN…VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF AUTISM INC: $420,000 · PhilanthropyVIRGINIA INSTITUTE …NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL CHRISTIAN …Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $51,000 · HealthMARTHA JEFFERSON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $30,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,000 · Health+2 more: $4,000 · HealthEntrega: $45,000 · ReligionTRUTH FOR LIFE: $10,000 · ReligionTHE GETTY MUSIC FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · ReligionTHERE WITH CARE: $30,000 · Human ServicesPIEDMONT FAMILY YMCA INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesTHOMAS JEFFERSON FOUNDATION INC: $44,000 · Arts & CultureFORT WAYNE BALLET INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MANHATTAN: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,063,726Education$765,000Philanthropy$445,000Health$95,000Religion$65,000Human Services$60,000Arts & Culture$54,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGROVE CITY COLLEGE: $670,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetVIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF AUTISM INC: $420,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetVIRGINIA STUDENT AID FOUNDATION INC: $95,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $51,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEntrega: $45,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON FOUNDATION INC: $44,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHERE WITH CARE: $30,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPIEDMONT FAMILY YMCA INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 44% of budgetFOOTHILLS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $22,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetCHILD HEALTH PARTNERSHIP INC: $21,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY INVESTMENT COLLABORATIVE: $10,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUTH FOR LIFE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GETTY MUSIC FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetFORT WAYNE BALLET INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MANHATTAN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GROVE CITY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF AUTISM INC ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA STUDENT AID FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds Entrega ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THERE WITH CARE ↗
  • Who funds PIEDMONT FAMILY YMCA INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOTHILLS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CHILD HEALTH PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY INVESTMENT COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUTH FOR LIFE ↗
  • Who funds THE GETTY MUSIC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FORT WAYNE BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MANHATTAN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Perry Foundation IncVA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Perry Foundation Inc · Charlottesville Area Community Foundation · Manning Family Foundation · Whitney and Anne Stone Foundation · United Way of Greater Charlottesville · The Genan Foundation · Caplin Foundation · The Better Living Foundation · The Rimora Foundation · The J & E Berkley Foundation · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rathburn Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rathburn Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rathburn Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph