Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Randy W Brewer Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182022.

International$499kEducation$191kReligion$128kCommunity Improvement$86kYouth Development$61kHuman Services$53kEmployment$42kPublic Safety & Disaster$30kOther$0
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$3,729
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEHO CHURCH$3,729
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

Your US giving — 73% of grant dollars ($843k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 27% that went abroad ($308k) is mapped below.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–20, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COMPTON INITIATIVE: $10k → 14%COMPTON INITIATIVE: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Beyond the US — 27% of all-years giving ($308k)

6 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Uganda$110k · 4 grants
Kenya$77k · 10 grants
Indonesia$60k · 3 grants
Nigeria$47k · 1 grant
Peru$10k · 1 grant
Singapore$5k · 1 grant

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 19% of Randy W Brewer Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 67% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 52% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Randy W Brewer Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 33% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$858k · 15 repeat orgs$283k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against +42% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2022, 15 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
25

Total granted

$858k
$279k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+42%

Still filing today

33%
16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • W
    WORLDHARVEST
    4× · 2018–2021 · $179k · revenue +129%
  • BG
    BY GRACE TRUST
    3× · 2018–2020 · $173k · revenue +67% · 46% of their budget
  • BU
    BIOLA UNIVERSITY INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $58k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $47k
  • WC
    WEHOCHURCH COM
    one grant, 2021 · $44k
  • BG
    BY GRACE CBO XXX-XX-XXXX
    one grant, 2020 · $42k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Amazing Facts International

To proclaim to the world the everlasting gospel of revelation 14:6-12 and to encourage revival in the remnant church by leading people to embrace salvation by faith in jesus, to establish them in the church, and to disciple all believers…

Religion
2
The Christian Broadcasting Network Inc

The christian broadcasting network's mission is preaching the gospel of jesus christ into all the world. cbn's mission is preaching the gospel of jesus christ into all the world. the mission of cbn and its affiliated organizations is to…

Religion
3
Great Commission University Inc

Gcu serves the global church by educating mission leaders to fulfill the great commission of jesus christ. gcu accomplishes this mission through a comprehensive program of biblical and general education, christ-centered service and…

Education
4
International Needs

International needs has the vision to transform lives and change communities by helping christian nationals serve both god and neighbor within their own countries.

5
Connect the World

The purpose of the organization is to share the passionate love of god the father throughout the world, his salvation through his son, the lord jesus christ, and to lead people to an experience with the holy spirit and his power. our…

Religion
6
Jubal Band Ministries

Jubal band ministries mission is to invite people to become disciples of christian life with jesus.

Religion
7
Global Commission Partners Inc

Global commission partners is an evangelical missionary not for profit organization dedicated to evaluate and support native ministries who are planting the gospel of jesus christ among unreach people groups in poor countries.

Philanthropy
8
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
9
American Bible Society

Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.

Religion
10
Tri-State Christian Academy Inc

Our desire is to provide balanced, biblical direction to the child as a support to the home and to train each student to be self-disciplined and biblically directed in their walk with god and their fellow man. it is also our desire to meet…

Education
11
Calvery International Inc

Our mission is to glorify the name of the lord jesus christ by following his command to go teach all nations. we endeavor to minister to the needs of people all over the world by providing spritiual hope, physical wellness, education and…

International
12
Tamarind Inc

Collaborating for christ across the nations by equipping pastors and leaders, ministering compassion, reaching youth, and funding projects.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Vision Inc and the most unlike its peers is Grace Mission University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ASIAN ACCESS — $100,000 · OtherASIAN ACCESSIndividual grant recipient — $79,797 · OtherIndividual grant recipientANUGRAH MINISTRIES — $60,000 · OtherANUGRAH MINISTRIESIndividual grant recipient — $46,550 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWEHOCHURCH COM — $44,000 · OtherWEHOCHURCH COMBY GRACE CBO XXX-XX-XXXX — $41,600 · OtherBY GRACE CBO XXX-XX-XXXXIndividual grant recipient — $30,000 · OtherCITY CHURCH OF COMPTON — $30,000 · OtherBY GRACE — $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $29,963 · OtherLITTLE VOICES — $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $23,605 · Other+19 more — $80,880 · Other+19 moreWORLDHARVEST — $179,020 · ReligionWORLDHARVESTKINGDOM CAUSES INC CITY NET BEDROCK CREEK — $55,000 · ReligionKINGDOM CAUSES INC CITY N…Open Doors With Brother Andrew Inc — $15,000 · ReligionOpen Doors With Brother A…SAMARITAN'S PURSE — $10,000 · ReligionBY GRACE TRUST — $173,097 · Human ServicesBY GRACE TRUSTTHE COMPTON INITIATIVE — $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE COMPTON INITIAT…+1 more — $273 · Human ServicesBIOLA UNIVERSITY INC — $57,604 · EducationGRACE MISSION UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · EducationWORLD VISION INC — $10,000 · InternationalYOUNG LIFE — $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$621,395Religion$259,020Human Services$193,370Education$62,604International$10,000Youth Development$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWORLDHARVEST — $179,020 over 4y, 8.2% of budgetBY GRACE TRUST — $173,097 over 3y, 46% of budgetBIOLA UNIVERSITY INC — $57,604 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKINGDOM CAUSES INC CITY NET BEDROCK CREEK — $55,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE COMPTON INITIATIVE — $20,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRACE MISSION UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE THE MISSION — $273 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WORLDHARVEST
  • Who funds BY GRACE TRUST
  • Who funds BIOLA UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds KINGDOM CAUSES INC CITY NET BEDROCK CREEK
  • Who funds LITTLE VOICES
  • Who funds THE COMPTON INITIATIVE
  • Who funds Open Doors With Brother Andrew Inc
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC
  • Who funds GRACE MISSION UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Randy W Brewer Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Randy W Brewer Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Randy W Brewer Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph