California · Nonprofit
WORLDHARVEST
WORLDHARVEST (California) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $591,095 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($225,908). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 65% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- Revenue FY2025
- $1.2M
- Funders on record
- 6
- Grants received
- $591k
- Net assets
- $575k
What Worldharvest does
Mission
Provide community, educational, relief and media services to those in need in underserved countries.
As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.
Programs
Community Development and Disaster Relief Projects:In Sierra Leone community development included progress on a water well and brick making. In Uganda free medical services were provided. In India school supplies and free meals were distributed. In Indonesia character development seminars a 2 schools were provided. Joy bags were given to 341 families. Healthcare was provided. A serve the city project was run. In India, Pakistan, and Nepal 106 families were provided basic care packages. In Aceh 760 basic care packages were provided. In Sri Lanka 741 basic care packages were provided.
$582,677 spent55% of program spendingSponsor a Child: During 2025 600 children were sponsored in Indonesia, India, Uganda, Sierra Leone, Pakistan, Somalia, and Mali. SPONSOR A CHILD: SPONSORS FROM AROUND THE USA AND THE WORLD FOR $36 PER MONTH. These funds offer educational opportunities, health care and health-related instruction, nutrition, life-skills training, and opportunities to hear about and respond to the gospel by working with local churches. Our program offers the sponsorship of impoverished children in Indonesia, Pakistan, Nepal, India, and Africa. In the sprawling urban areas of Indonesia, most poverty-stricken children are forced to live in densely packed ghettos that are made up of ramshackle huts. The smog and soot from Jakartas industrial centers constantly surround their homes. To make things worse, these ghettos are located near landfills and rivers blackened by years of waste and sewage. Most of these children lack access to clean water, proper nutrition and education.Our Sponsor A Child Program directly impacts your sponsored child and the community he or she lives in. It ensures that the child will receive an education and that his or her medical and nutritional needs are met. Part of your…
$333,145 spent31% of program spendingEvangelismLeadership conferences:In 2025 there were leadership conferences held in 22 countries.Online ministry to Muslim Background believer:Four field teams in mostly urban areas. 137 people were followed up on. 23 people became new believers and 9 were baptized. In Indonesia 423 were followed up on. 28 became believers and 18 were Baptized. In Afghanistan there were 127 new believers including 60 Muslim background beliers. In Pakistan a leadership training center was established, dairy farming was established a church building and a school was established. Youth conference were provided, an a build for ministry was established. In India the Gospel was shared with approximately 4,800 people. Of these 1,350 accepted Christ. 678 were Baptized. 15 sewing machines were provided to former sex workers who found new life in Christ. 500 Bibles were distributed. In India and vicinity and Nepal 1,682 house churches were established. Also, 63 churches were established. In the middle east 12 churches were established. In Europe 31 churches were established among people speaking Urdu, Indonesian, and, Turkish, Bulgarian, Greek.In east Africa provided items for families of martyred pastors,…
$146,961 spent14% of program spending
The 3 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,062,783.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $372k to $680k (+83%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2020 3%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
98% of WORLDHARVEST’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (90% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Chief executive
Daniel Hanafi
Chairman/CEO
As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.
Who funds it, year by year
2018 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 4 funders, grant income rose $22k → $126k.
3 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 65% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of WORLDHARVEST’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
WORLDHARVEST leans on a few funders — its largest provides 38% of grant income and the top three 96%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
68% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund WORLDHARVEST.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 50% · 2021 83% · 2022 74% · 2023 50% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
65% of WORLDHARVEST's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $204k that is directly attributable, 88% of it comes from California funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $387k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
WORLDHARVEST has grown faster than half of the 1,211 religion nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,211 religion nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025
Organizations like WORLDHARVEST
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In California
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
77% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
88%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WORLDHARVEST: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds WORLDHARVEST?
- WORLDHARVEST (California) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $591,095 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($225,908). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 65% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does WORLDHARVEST have?
- IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $591,095 in grants to WORLDHARVEST, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of WORLDHARVEST?
- FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $225,908 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like WORLDHARVEST find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds Worldharvest →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 6 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing