Skip to content
Random Tuesday Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Random Tuesday Inc

Creates global communities, harnessing the power of fandom to inspire individuals to better themselves and the world around them through physical fitness programs.

$91k
Granted FY2022
3
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Health$313kHuman Services$260kAnimals$205kEnvironment$153kYouth Development$87kPublic Benefit$82kCommunity Improvement$75kInternational$46kOther$0
02FY2022 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $37,636, the rows itemized in this filing. The $91,075 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $53,439 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $24k
$8,202
Median grant
3
States reached
$6k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
National Diaper Bank Network$24,000
Open Hand Atlanta$8,202
In Our Backyard$5,434
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $179k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Patriot PAWS Service Dogs: $13k → 5%She Should Run: $2k → 14%RODS: $68k → 11%Racing for Orphans with Downs: $15k → 8%NATIONAL DIAPER BANK: $54k → 12%National Diaper Bank Network: $24k → 12%She's The First Inc PO Box: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
WA
WI
NY
OR
NV
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
KY
MD
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

26%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$343k · 6 repeat orgs$954k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +69% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
39

Total granted

$343k
$946k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+33%

Still filing today

100%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsInternationalPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TI
    TWLOHA INC
    2× · 2017–2020 · $89k · revenue +69%
  • RH
    RODS HEROES INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $83k · revenue +112% · 40% of their budget
  • ND
    NATIONAL DIAPER BANK NETWORK INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $78k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • AA
    Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalitiongraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $131k · revenue +40%
  • BC
    BROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $81k · revenue +33%
  • HA
    HP ALLIANCE INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $81k · revenue -28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
2
Fauna & Flora International Usa Inc

Our mission is to act to conserve threatened species and ecosystems worldwide, choosing solutions that are sustainable, based on sound science and take into account human needs.

Philanthropy
3
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
4
Keralink International Inc

Keralink international works to end avoidable blindness by developing, delivering, and scaling affordable solutions for all, powered by innovative technology and partnerships.

Health
5
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
6
Us Digital Response

U.s. digital response is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that helps governments, nonprofits, and public entities respond quickly to critical public needs. the organization serves the public by leveraging a network of pro bono…

Public Safety & Disaster
7
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
8
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
9
New York Road Runners Inc

As a new york city based nonprofit, we're dedicated to transforming the health and well-being of our communities through inclusive and accessible running experiences, empowering all to achieve their potential.

—
10
Handicap International

Handicap international dba humanity & inclusion (hi) works with people with disabilities and people living in situations of vulnerability, including poverty, exclusion, conflict, and disaster.

International
11
Save the Sea Turtles International Dba One Ocean Conservation

We empower communities around the globe to protect sea turtles, corals, sharks, and the vital marine species and ecosystems they call home through hands-on conservation, education, and sustainable solutions. our team leads reef and beach…

Animals
12
Hero Dogs Inc

Hero Dogs improves the quality of life of our nations heroes and enhances the services of community organizations by placing assistance dogs with customized training & lifetime support.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is She's the First Inc; the most unlike its peers is Magic Wheelchair. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/44
Grantees still filing
25/44
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RODS HEROES INC: $83,407 · Human ServicesRODS HEROES INCNATIONAL DIAPER BANK NETWORK INC: $78,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL DIAPER BANK N…BACK ON MY FEET: $60,270 · Human ServicesBACK ON MY FEETMagic Wheelchair: $22,207 · Human ServicesMagic WheelchairPATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $12,557 · Human Services+2 more: $4,646 · Human ServicesBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC: $81,238 · OtherBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS I…HP ALLIANCE INC: $80,573 · OtherHP ALLIANCE INCSOS GALGOS USA INC: $21,444 · OtherSOS GALGOS USA INCAchilles International Inc: $16,790 · OtherBig Brothers Big Sisters of Metro Atlanta Inc: $14,560 · OtherENABLE Alliance: $14,240 · OtherGALGOS DEL SOL USA: $21,444 · OtherGALGOS DEL SOL USATEAM RUBICON INC: $13,240 · OtherIn Our Backyard: $13,228 · Other+14 more: $116,443 · Other+14 moreTWLOHA INC: $89,202 · HealthTWLOHA INCLIMBS FOR LIFE FOUNDATION: $78,249 · HealthLIMBS FOR LIFE FOU…PROJECT PURPLE INC: $12,847 · HealthPROJECT PURPLE INCTranslifeline DBA Trans Lifeline: $12,745 · HealthTranslifeline DBA …CEREBRAL PALSY FOUNDATION INC: $7,311 · Health+2 more: $12,391 · Health+2 moreMission K9 Rescue Inc: $75,747 · AnimalsMission K9 Re…TOUCAN RESCUE RANCH INC: $33,200 · AnimalsTOUCAN RESCUE…GOATS OF ANARCHY INC: $32,631 · AnimalsGOATS OF ANAR…WILDLIFE PROTECTION SOLUTIONS: $7,802 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF RETIRED GREYHOUNDS: $5,307 · AnimalsAntarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition: $130,960 · EnvironmentAntarctic a…HISPANIC FEDERATION INC: $69,065 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $6,267 · Community ImprovementAll Star Code Inc: $69,698 · Youth Development
Human Services$261,087Other$393,200Health$212,745Animals$154,687Environment$130,960Community Improvement$75,332Youth Development$69,698

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAntarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition: $130,960 over 1y, 13% of budgetTWLOHA INC: $89,202 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetRODS HEROES INC: $83,407 over 2y, 40% of budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC: $81,238 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHP ALLIANCE INC: $80,573 over 2y, 24% of budgetLIMBS FOR LIFE FOUNDATION: $78,249 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL DIAPER BANK NETWORK INC: $78,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMission K9 Rescue Inc: $75,747 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetAll Star Code Inc: $69,698 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetHISPANIC FEDERATION INC: $69,065 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBACK ON MY FEET: $60,270 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTOUCAN RESCUE RANCH INC: $33,200 over 1y, 15% of budgetGOATS OF ANARCHY INC: $32,631 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetMagic Wheelchair: $22,207 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetGALGOS DEL SOL USA: $21,444 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetAchilles International Inc: $16,790 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of Metro Atlanta Inc: $14,560 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $13,240 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIn Our Backyard: $13,228 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetPROJECT PURPLE INC: $12,847 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTranslifeline DBA Trans Lifeline: $12,745 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $12,557 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetONE TREE PLANTED INC: $12,478 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRANDOM ACTS INC: $12,240 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetRANDOM TUESDAY INC: $10,912 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWATER FIRST INTERNATIONAL: $10,044 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOceans Initiative: $10,004 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetQUADBALL INC: $9,899 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetMUSIC & MEMORY INC: $9,874 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetOPEN HAND ATLANTA INC: $8,202 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWILDLIFE PROTECTION SOLUTIONS: $7,802 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCEREBRAL PALSY FOUNDATION INC: $7,311 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSEA TURTLE INC: $7,026 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKnitted Knockers Support Foundation: $6,876 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetADULT LITERACY LEAGUE INC: $6,535 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $6,267 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDays For Girls International: $5,535 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGROUNDS FOR HEALTH INC: $5,515 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF RETIRED GREYHOUNDS: $5,307 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetNURSES HOUSE INC: $5,148 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAMA TO MAMA INC: $3,260 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetSHE'S THE FIRST INC: $2,874 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHE SHOULD RUN: $1,772 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company Fou…The Pfizer Foundation…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Salesforce FoundationVerizon FoundationCarmax FoundationTides FoundationNetwork for GoodAmerican Express Foun…The Robert Wood Johns…The Blackbaud Giving …Paypal Charitable Giv…
Shell USA Company FoundationTX14.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Salesforce Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Carmax Foundation · Tides Foundation · Network for Good · American Express Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Random Tuesday Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Random Tuesday Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    11get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Random Tuesday Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Random Tuesday Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $47k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Random Tuesday’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home