Skip to content

· Private foundation

Random Acts of Humach Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$39k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$46kFood & Nutrition$21kCommunity Improvement$9kHuman Services$7kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kEducation$3kYouth Development$3kAnimals$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
$250
Median grant
8
States reached
$44k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITEDHEALTHCARE CHILDRENS FOUNDATION$30,450
HUA MOMONA FOUNDATION$4,900
COMPASS TO CARE$750
WILKINSON CENTER$525
JULIE ROGERS GIFT OF LIFE$250
ALMOST HOME SHELTER FOR DAD'S WITH CHILDREN$250
AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION$250
GARTH HOUSE$250
FEED THE CHILDREN$250
VAN ZANDT COUNTY CHILDREN'S SHELTER$250
GRAND PRAIRIE PARK AND RECREATION$250
OPENING DOORS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES$250
RAINBOW DAYS$250
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE HEARTLAND$200
RISE FROM THE ASHES$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNITEDHEALTHCARE CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $30k → 11%WHISPERS OF HOPE HORSE FARM: $250 → 9%SOUTHEAST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $300 → 19%PROYECTO JUAN DIEGO: $100 → 23%RISE FROM THE ASHES: $100 → 7%UNITEDHEALTHCARE CHILDRENS FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%WHISPERS OF HOPE HORSE FARM: $100 → 9%GARTH HOUSE: $250 → 19%NORTHEAST IOWA AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $100 → 17%NORTHEAST IOWA AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $100 → 17%RESOURCES UNITE: $350 → 11%RESOURCES UNITE: $250 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
IA
OH
PA
CA
UT
CO
AZ
HI
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$70k · 16 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
45

Total granted

$70k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+8%

Still filing today

75%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionAnimalsEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    UNITEDHEALTHCARE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $40k · revenue +2%
  • HM
    HUA MOMONA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +140%
  • CT
    COMPASS TO CARE
    6× · 2018–2024 · $2k · revenue +92%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $9k
  • HF
    Holidays for Lahaina Ohana Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • C
    CHILDCAREGROUPgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +90%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Greater Charlotte Inc

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Greater Charlotte (RMHC of GC) provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare. Charlotte is recognized as a leading destination…

Human Services
2
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—
3
Rise Against Hunger Inc

Rise against hunger, inc. is an international hunger relief non-profit organization that is driven by a vision of a world without hunger and a mission to end hunger in our lifetime. rise against hunger distributes food and other…

International
4
Brighter Bites Inc

To create communities of health through fresh food. Brighter Bites seeks to improve health outcomes among children and families in under-resourced communities by using data-driven, evidence-based strategies for providing fresh produce and…

Food & Nutrition
5
West Texas Food Bank

The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…

—
6
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Greater Washongton Dc Inc

Ronald mcdonald house charities of greater washington, dc (rmhcdc) provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

Health
7
Russell House Response to Domestic

Provide compassionate services to empower survivors of domestic and sexual violence. we provide emergency shelter, advocacy, counseling, support groups, transporation and a 24/7 crisis line.

Human Services
8
Meals On Wheels of Odessa Inc

Meals on Wheels of Odessa enables people to live with dignity by offering community support and sustenance through coordinated services and enable older adults to live in their own homes safely and independently as long as they are able.

—
9
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
10
Child Abuse Network Inc dba Child Advocacy Network

In Tulsa County there are several agencies that address prevention and treatment of child abuse, but the Child Advocacy Network (CAN) is the ONLY nonprofit that provides intervention services for children and their nonoffending…

Crime & Legal
11
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
12
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Jacksonville Inc

Ronald mcdonald house charities of jacksonville is a 501(c3) organization that supports the health and well-being of children by providing lodging, meals, transportation and a community of compassionate care to critically ill children and…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Unitedhealthcare Children's Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Hua Momona Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/46
Grantees still filing
28/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITEDHEALTHCARE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $40,450 · Human ServicesUNITEDHEALTHCARE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION+7 more: $1,900 · Human ServicesIndividual grant recipient: $8,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHolidays for Lahaina Ohana Foundation: $5,000 · OtherHolidays for Lahaina Ohana Found…CHILDCAREGROUP: $2,500 · OtherCHILDCAREGROUPJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE HEARTLAND: $2,100 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE HEARTL…TOYS FOR TOTS: $1,353 · Other+36 more: $9,197 · Other+36 moreHUA MOMONA FOUNDATION: $19,900 · Food & NutritionHUA MOMONA FOUNDATION+3 more: $650 · Food & NutritionCOMPASS TO CARE: $2,400 · HealthAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $500 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF TAMPA BAY INC: $400 · HealthTWLOHA INC: $300 · HealthBEBRAVE513 INC: $250 · HealthJulie Rogers Gift of Life Program: $250 · HealthRAINBOW DAYS INC: $250 · Health+3 more: $356 · HealthDUBUQUE REGIONAL HUMANE SOCIETY: $900 · AnimalsSTRAYDOG INC: $500 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC: $300 · AnimalsCEDAR BEND HUMANE SOCIETY: $100 · AnimalsMentorKids USA: $1,000 · ReligionWILKINSON CENTER: $525 · EducationRiverview Center Inc: $200 · Education
Human Services$42,350Other$28,650Food & Nutrition$20,550Health$4,706Animals$1,800Religion$1,000Education$725

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITEDHEALTHCARE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $40,450 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHUA MOMONA FOUNDATION: $19,900 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCHILDCAREGROUP: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASS TO CARE: $2,400 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMentorKids USA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDUBUQUE REGIONAL HUMANE SOCIETY: $900 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVETERANS FREEDOM CENTER INC: $600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetResources Unite: $600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWILKINSON CENTER: $525 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House of Dallas Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTRAYDOG INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLORAS COLLEGE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF TAMPA BAY INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHISPERS OF HOPE HORSE FARM: $350 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSIREN EATON SHELTER: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAWKEYE HARVEST FOOD BANK: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTWLOHA INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER CONNECTION: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSoutheast Texas Food Bank Inc: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJulie Rogers Gift of Life Program: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR RESCUE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPENING DOORS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGarth House Mickey Mehaffy Childrens Advocacy Program Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAINBOW DAYS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINNIES FOOD PANTRY INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRiverview Center Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS IOWA INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEAST IOWA AREA AGENCY ON AGING INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREAD AHEAD INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF IOWA INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $106 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROYECTO JUAN DIEGO INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHRIVEWELL CANCER FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF RIO GRANDE VALLEY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Fountain of Youth Program: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCEDAR BEND HUMANE SOCIETY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOVIE INSTITUTE: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHERN LIGHTS ALLIANCE FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SOCIETY OF COLORADO: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Greater DubuqueIA25.5× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Dubuque · Ay McDonald Charitable Foundation · Dubuque Racing Association Ltd · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Spahn & Rose Lumber Co Charitable Fdtn · Heartland Charitable Trust · Falb Family Charitable Foundation · United Way of Dubuque Area Tri-States · Crescent Electric Charitable Foundation · Lsb Foundation · Resources Unite · Sirk Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Random Acts of Humach Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Random Acts of Humach Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Random Acts of Humach Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Random Acts of Humach Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Random Acts of Humach’s filings →

More from the funding graph