· Private foundation
Random Acts of Humach Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k15 grants · $9k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITEDHEALTHCARE CHILDRENS FOUNDATION | $30,450 |
| HUA MOMONA FOUNDATION | $4,900 |
| COMPASS TO CARE | $750 |
| WILKINSON CENTER | $525 |
| VAN ZANDT COUNTY CHILDREN'S SHELTER | $250 |
| JULIE ROGERS GIFT OF LIFE | $250 |
| ALMOST HOME SHELTER FOR DAD'S WITH CHILDREN | $250 |
| AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION | $250 |
| RAINBOW DAYS | $250 |
| GRAND PRAIRIE PARK AND RECREATION | $250 |
| OPENING DOORS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES | $250 |
| GARTH HOUSE | $250 |
| FEED THE CHILDREN | $250 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE HEARTLAND | $200 |
| SIREN-EATON SHELTER | $100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
16 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HMHUA MOMONA FOUNDATION2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +140%
- CTCOMPASS TO CARE6× · 2018–2024 · $2k · revenue +92%
- DRDUBUQUE REGIONAL HUMANE SOCIETY3× · 2018–2020 · $900 · revenue +60%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $9k
- HFHolidays for Lahaina Ohana Foundationone grant, 2023 · $5k
- CCHILDCAREGROUPgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +90%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Greater Charlotte (RMHC of GC) provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare. Charlotte is recognized as a leading destination…
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.
Rise against hunger, inc. is an international hunger relief non-profit organization that is driven by a vision of a world without hunger and a mission to end hunger in our lifetime. rise against hunger distributes food and other…
To create communities of health through fresh food. Brighter Bites seeks to improve health outcomes among children and families in under-resourced communities by using data-driven, evidence-based strategies for providing fresh produce and…
The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…
Ronald mcdonald house charities of greater washington, dc (rmhcdc) provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.
Provide compassionate services to empower survivors of domestic and sexual violence. we provide emergency shelter, advocacy, counseling, support groups, transporation and a 24/7 crisis line.
Meals on Wheels of Odessa enables people to live with dignity by offering community support and sustenance through coordinated services and enable older adults to live in their own homes safely and independently as long as they are able.
Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.
In Tulsa County there are several agencies that address prevention and treatment of child abuse, but the Child Advocacy Network (CAN) is the ONLY nonprofit that provides intervention services for children and their nonoffending…
To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.
Ronald mcdonald house charities of jacksonville is a 501(c3) organization that supports the health and well-being of children by providing lodging, meals, transportation and a community of compassionate care to critically ill children and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Unitedhealthcare Children's Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Hua Momona Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 26% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITEDHEALTHCARE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HUA MOMONA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDCAREGROUP ↗
- Who funds COMPASS TO CARE ↗
- Who funds MentorKids USA ↗
- Who funds DUBUQUE REGIONAL HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Resources Unite ↗
- Who funds VETERANS FREEDOM CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WILKINSON CENTER ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
- Who funds FEED THE CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds Ronald McDonald House of Dallas Inc ↗
- Who funds LORAS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds STRAYDOG INC ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
- Who funds SIREN EATON SHELTER ↗
- Who funds HAWKEYE HARVEST FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds WHISPERS OF HOPE HORSE FARM ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S CANCER CONNECTION ↗
- Who funds CASA OF GRAYSON COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Southeast Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds TWLOHA INC ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Julie Rogers Gift of Life Program ↗
- Who funds OUR RESCUE ↗
- Who funds OPENING DOORS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Dubuque · Ay McDonald Charitable Foundation · Dubuque Racing Association Ltd · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Spahn & Rose Lumber Co Charitable Fdtn · Heartland Charitable Trust · Falb Family Charitable Foundation · United Way of Dubuque Area Tri-States · Crescent Electric Charitable Foundation · Lsb Foundation · Resources Unite · Sirk Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Random Acts of Humach Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Feed the Children Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Random Acts of Humach Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Random Acts of Humach Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.