· Private foundation
Randall & Rhonda Toney Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k9 grants · $8k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $32k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LONG HOLLOW BAPTIST CHURCH | $65,000 |
| BELMONT UNIVERSITY | $21,500 |
| UNIVERSITY of TENNESSEE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| TAYLOR UNIVERSITY | $1,000 |
| GRACE PLACE MINISTRIES | $1,000 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIAITON | $1,000 |
| LIVING WATER COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION INC | $1,000 |
| FIRST PRIORITY MINISTRIES | $1,000 |
| CUMBERLAND CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER | $1,000 |
| WHO YOU WITH MINISTRIES | $1,000 |
| K LOVE MINISTRIES | $1,000 |
| NATION of COACHES | $250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +113% since the first grant, against +64% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LHLONG HOLLOW BAPTIST CHURCH8× · 2017–2024 · $233k
- BUBelmont University4× · 2021–2024 · $69k · revenue +43%
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION INC6× · 2018–2024 · $28k · revenue +113%
Funded once
- BBBELMONT BRUIN CLUBone grant, 2020 · $5k
- TFTENNESSEE FUNDone grant, 2017 · $5k
- NYNASHVILLE YOUTH SPORTSone grant, 2023 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
See Disclosure Above.
North greenville university exists to glorify god by cultivating graduates who are equipped to serve as transformational leaders for church and society.
Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.
East texas baptist university (etbu) was founded in 1912 as a fully accredited institution of higher education. affiliated with the baptist general convention of texas, etbu educates students by integrating biblical faith and learning to…
George fox university, a christ centered community, prepares students spiritually, academically, and professionally to think with clarity, act with integrity, and serve with passion.
We educate and equip students to lead lives of impact through transformative academics in a christ-centered community.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.
The Mission of WBCL is to communicate God's redemptive love, grace, and truth through captivating media.
To plant campus ministries to encourage students to accept jesus christ as lord and savior, to connect college students with god and establish them in christ's church, and to work in teams to pursue, model, and teach intimacy with god…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is First Priority Global Ministries and the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Belmont University ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds Taylor University ↗
- Who funds WHO U WITH MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds LIVING WATER COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION INC ↗
- Who funds CUMBERLAND CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
- Who funds FIRST PRIORITY GLOBAL MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE LOVING NASHVILLE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds GOODLETTSVILLE BASEBALL ↗
- Who funds NATIONS OF COACHES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Randall & Rhonda Toney Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.