Skip to content
Ramp Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Ramp Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$827k
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Philanthropy$8.6MArts & Culture$1.2MCivil Rights$280kHealth$270kAnimals$155kEducation$80kFood & Nutrition$66kPublic Benefit$60kOther$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $230k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $318k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$20,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$6.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$250,000
MAYO CLINIC$100,000
HELLMAN FOUNDATION$93,000
THEATREWORKS INC$75,000
ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER$50,000
THE USF INSTITUTE FOR NONVIOLENCE AND SOCIAL JUSTICE$30,000
SWEETWATER MUSIC HALL INC$25,000
WNET$25,000
BERKELEY REPERTORY THEATRE$25,000
AMERICAN CONSERVATORY THEATER$20,000
BREAD AND ROSES COMMUNITY FUND$20,000
THE POLITICAL REPORT INC$20,000
REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION$15,000
CAMP WINNARAINBOW$10,000
FREE PRESS FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $70k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MY NEW RED SHOES: $15k → 7%MY NEW RED SHOES: $5k → 7%THE POLITICAL REPORT INC: $20k → 14%MY NEW RED SHOES: $5k → 7%INTERNET ARCHIVE: $10k → 10%THE POLITICAL REPORT INC: $10k → 14%MY NEW RED SHOES: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
MO
VA
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 28 repeat orgs$828k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
25

Total granted

$1.9M
$688k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+10%

Still filing today

82%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationCivil RightsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BR
    BERKELEY REPERTORY THEATRE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $400k · revenue +2%
  • HF
    HELLMAN FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $279k · revenue ×19
  • TS
    THEATREWORKS SILICON VALLEY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $150k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • VF
    VITALOGY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $250k · revenue +334%
  • CS
    CONSERVATION SOCIETY OF CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2023 · $155k · revenue +13%
  • BC
    BUCKS COUNTY PLAYHOUSE
    one grant, 2020 · $54k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
2
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
3
America's Newspapers

Providing research, education and practical information all aimed at optimizing newspapers' business operations, deepening their community engagement and enhancing the quality of their journalism.

Employment
4
The Paris Review Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to foster the development of creative individuals as writers and artists and to promote public appreciation of excellence in the literary and graphic arts by publishing a magazine containing fiction,…

Education
5
The Conversationalist
—
6
Kqed Inc

See schedule okqed serves the people of northern california with a community-supported alternative to commercial media, providing the knowledge needed to make informed decisions; convening community dialogue; bringing the arts to everyone;…

Arts & Culture
7
Public Knowledge

Public knowledge promotes freedom of expression, an open internet, and access to affordable communications tools and creative works. we work to shape policy on behalf of the public interest.

Public Benefit
8
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
9
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

—
10
Public Media Nj Inc

To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse

Arts & Culture
11
Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University Inc

The Knight First Amendment Institute defends the freedoms of speech and the press in the digital age through strategic litigation, research, public advocacy and public education. Our aim is to promote a system of free expression that is…

Education
12
Public Radio International Inc

To serve audiences as a distinctive content source for information, insights and cultural experiences essential to living in our diverse, interconnected world.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Winnarainbow Inc Dba Camp Winnarainbow; the most unlike its peers is Rex Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
51/52
Grantees still filing
32/52
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $7,972,000 · PhilanthropyMARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION+2 more: $529,000 · Philanthropy+2 moreBERKELEY REPERTORY THEATRE: $400,000 · Arts & CultureBERKELEY …THEATREWORKS SILICON VALLEY: $150,000 · Arts & CultureTHEATREWO…THE 19TH NEWS: $53,000 · Arts & CultureTHE 19TH …MCCARTER THEATRE COMPANY: $50,000 · Arts & CultureMCCARTER …FREE PRESS FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Arts & Culture+13 more: $197,500 · Arts & Culture+13 moreTHEATREWORKS INC: $225,000 · OtherTHEATREWOR…MAYO CLINIC: $150,000 · OtherMAYO CLINI…REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $60,000 · OtherREPRODUCTI…Bread and Roses Community Fund: $57,000 · OtherBread and …THE USF INSTITUTE FOR NONVIOLENCE AND SOCIAL JUSTICE: $55,000 · OtherTHE USF IN…BUCKS COUNTY PLAYHOUSE: $53,880 · OtherBUCKS COUN…REX FOUNDATION: $45,000 · OtherBREAD & ROSES INC: $46,000 · OtherWINNARAINBOW INC DBA CAMP WINNARAINBOW: $40,000 · Other+19 more: $235,500 · Other+19 moreGIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $60,000 · Civil RightsELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER: $50,000 · Civil RightsInvisible Institute: $40,000 · Civil RightsINDIVISIBLE CIVICS: $25,000 · Civil Rights+1 more: $5,000 · Civil RightsCONSERVATION SOCIETY OF CALIFORNIA: $155,000 · AnimalsMAYO CLINIC: $100,000 · HealthTrust Women Foundation Inc: $20,000 · HealthTHE CENTER FOR CARTOON STUDIES: $45,000 · EducationSWARTHMORE COLLEGE: $26,000 · EducationMEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA: $15,000 · EducationVALUES UNITED: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · Education
Philanthropy$8,501,000Arts & Culture$880,500Other$967,380Civil Rights$180,000Animals$155,000Health$120,000Education$97,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $7,972,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetBERKELEY REPERTORY THEATRE: $400,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetHELLMAN FOUNDATION: $279,000 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetVITALOGY FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetCONSERVATION SOCIETY OF CALIFORNIA: $155,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHEATREWORKS SILICON VALLEY: $150,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $60,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBread and Roses Community Fund: $57,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE 19TH NEWS: $53,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMCCARTER THEATRE COMPANY: $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER: $50,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetBREAD & ROSES INC: $46,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetREX FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR CARTOON STUDIES: $45,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetWINNARAINBOW INC DBA CAMP WINNARAINBOW: $40,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetInvisible Institute: $40,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetMBOLDEN CHANGE: $30,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetFREE PRESS FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 93% of budgetTHE POLITICAL REPORT INC: $30,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetSWARTHMORE COLLEGE: $26,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWNET: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSWEETWATER MUSIC HALL INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetINDIVISIBLE CIVICS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ROCK AND ROLL HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CONSERVATORY THEATRE FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLAY ON PHILLY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetPANORAMA GLOBAL: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTrust Women Foundation Inc: $20,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetROCK AND SOUL FOREVER FOUNDATION INC: $17,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWOODSIDE-PORTOLA VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION FOUNDATION INC: $13,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetBOOKSTORMER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetGUARDIANORG FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSIGNAL TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WALDEN SCHOOL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetRoots & Branches Conservancy: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF EAST CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL CITIZENS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCITYSIDE JOURNALISM INITIATIVE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBERKELEY SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF TRADITIONAL MUSIC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVALUES UNITED: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSECOND HARVEST COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUS-IRELAND ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetInternet Archive: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOpenhouse: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community Found…Silicon Valley Commun…Gs Donor Advised Phil…The William & Flora H…Jewish Community Fede…Rsf Social Finance IncNational Philanthropi…ImpactassetsincTides FoundationThe Robert Wood Johns…The San Francisco Fou…Vanguard Charitable E…
Marin Community FoundationCA25.9× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Rsf Social Finance Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Impactassetsinc · Tides Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ramp Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ramp Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ramp Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ramp Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ramp’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home