Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rachel B Williams Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$111k
Granted FY2024still arriving
35
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$140kCivil Rights$95kFood & Nutrition$86kRecreation & Sports$75kEducation$74kArts & Culture$67kHealth$65kEnvironment$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k33 grants · $84k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $27k
$2,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$733k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILY MATTERS$17,000
THE CAMP HIGHLAND FOUNDATION$10,000
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR$5,000
Planned Parenthood AZ$5,000
FOX VALLEY FOOD FOR HEALTH$5,000
29 Pieces$5,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$5,000
RUSSELL HOME FOR ATYPICAL CHILDREN$5,000
TOYS FOR TEXANS$4,000
Planned parenthood of greater Texas$3,000
Oceana$3,000
BETWEEN FRIENDS$3,000
THE NIGHT MINISTRY$3,000
Lurie Childrens Hospital of Chicago$3,000
The Trevor Project$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $107k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TOYS FOR TEXANS: $6k → 5%TOYS FOR TEXANS: $4k → 5%TOYS FOR TEXANS: $4k → 5%HESED HOUSE: $3k → 8%HESED HOUSE: $3k → 8%HESED HOUSE: $3k → 8%HESED HOUSE: $3k → 8%HESED HOUSE: $3k → 8%HESED HOUSE: $3k → 8%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $3k → 14%HESED HOUSE: $3k → 8%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $3k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $3k → 14%HESED HOUSE: $3k → 8%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $3k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $3k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $3k → 14%CIRCESTEEM: $2k → 14%CIRCESTEEM: $2k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $2k → 14%CIRCESTEEM: $1k → 14%CIRCESTEEM: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF GREATER CHICAGO: $5k → 14%CIRCESTEEM: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF GREATER CHICAGO: $3k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF GREATER CHICAGO: $1k → 14%CIRCESTEEM: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF GREATER CHICAGO: $1k → 14%CIRCESTEEM: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF GREATER CHICAGO: $1k → 14%CIRCESTEEM: $1k → 14%BETWEEN FRIENDS: $3k → 14%BETWEEN FRIENDS: $3k → 14%BETWEEN FRIENDS: $2k → 14%BETWEEN FRIENDS: $2k → 14%BETWEEN FRIENDS: $2k → 14%BETWEEN FRIENDS: $2k → 14%BETWEEN FRIENDS: $1k → 14%BETWEEN FRIENDS: $1k → 14%LITTLE BROTHERS FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $4k → 14%LITTLE BROTHERS FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $3k → 14%LITTLE BROTHERS FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $2k → 14%LITTLE BROTHERS FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $1k → 14%LITTLE BROTHERS FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $1k → 14%LITTLE BROTHERS FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
OR
IN
OH
PA
CT
CA
KY
VA
AZ
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$733k · 46 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

46 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
22

Total granted

$733k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+17%

Still filing today

57%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationAnimalsFood & NutritionHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FM
    FAMILY MATTERS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $95k · revenue +28%
  • SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $33k · revenue +32%
  • CH
    CAMP HIGHLANDS FOR BOYS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $30k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • CH
    CAMP HIGHLANDS FOR BOYS
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • BY
    BREMEN YOUTH SERVICES ATTN DONALD SEBEK
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +7%
  • SC
    SWITZERLAND COUNTY HISTORICAL SOC
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
2
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
3
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
4
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
5
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals
6
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
7
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
8
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
9
Lincoln Park Zoological Society

Lincoln park zoo is dedicated to connecting people with nature by providing a free, family-oriented wildlife experience in the heart of chicago and by advancing the highest quality of animal care, horticulture, education, science and…

Animals
10
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…

Health
11
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
12
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Between Friends; the most unlike its peers is 29 Pieces. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/43
Grantees still filing
35/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $43,000 · OtherLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POORSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $33,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INCThe Russell Home For Atypical Children Inc: $30,000 · OtherThe Russell Home For Atypical Children IncAMERICAN CAMPING ASSOCIATION: $20,000 · OtherAMERICAN CAMPING ASSOC OF IL: $20,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $20,000 · OtherBABY BASICS: $15,000 · OtherCAMP HIGHLANDS FOR BOYS FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherCAMP HIGHLANDS FOR BOYS FOUNDATIONFOX VALLEY FOOD FOR HEALTH INC: $21,000 · Other+45 more: $166,300 · Other+45 morePUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER INC D/B/A HESED HOUSE: $24,000 · Human ServicesPUBLIC ACTION T…THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $20,700 · Human ServicesTHE NIGHT MINIS…BETWEEN FRIENDS: $16,000 · Human ServicesBETWEEN FRIENDSToys for Texans: $14,000 · Human ServicesToys for TexansLITTLE BROTHERS - FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $11,500 · Human ServicesLITTLE BROTHERS…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $11,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Nation…CIRCESTEEM INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesCIRCESTEEM INCFAMILY MATTERS INC: $95,400 · Community ImprovementFAMILY MATTER…HOLY FAMILY MINISTRIES: $21,000 · EducationHOLY FAMI…UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $18,000 · EducationUNITED NE…THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $13,000 · EducationTHE ART I…UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC: $12,000 · EducationUNIVERSIT…THE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER: $5,500 · EducationTHE COLLE…+1 more: $1,000 · Education29 PIECES: $45,000 · Arts & CultureENDURE CHARITIES INC: $4,250 · Arts & CultureTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $16,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $16,000 · EnvironmentKEEP AMERICA BEAUTIFUL INC: $15,000 · EnvironmentHEARTLAND ANIMAL SHELTER NFP: $15,000 · AnimalsSOUTH FLORIDA WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $11,000 · AnimalsThe Anti-Cruelty Society: $8,000 · AnimalsK9 KONNECTION: $2,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF SONOMA COUNTY: $2,000 · Animals
Other$398,300Human Services$107,200Community Improvement$95,400Education$70,500Arts & Culture$49,250Environment$47,000Animals$38,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMILY MATTERS INC: $95,400 over 8y, 1.7% of budget29 PIECES: $45,000 over 8y, 3.9% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $33,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP HIGHLANDS FOR BOYS FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetThe Russell Home For Atypical Children Inc: $30,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetPUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER INC D/B/A HESED HOUSE: $24,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHOLY FAMILY MINISTRIES: $21,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFOX VALLEY FOOD FOR HEALTH INC: $21,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $20,700 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $18,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBETWEEN FRIENDS: $16,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetKEEP AMERICA BEAUTIFUL INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHEARTLAND ANIMAL SHELTER NFP: $15,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetToys for Texans: $14,000 over 3y, 6.4% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $13,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC: $12,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE BROTHERS - FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY: $11,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $11,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA WILDLIFE CENTER INC: $11,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetRETREET: $11,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetCIRCESTEEM INC: $10,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetThe Anti-Cruelty Society: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH AURORA MOTHERS CLUB: $7,500 over 6y, 14% of budgetTHE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBREMEN YOUTH SERVICES ATTN DONALD SEBEK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetENDURE CHARITIES INC: $4,250 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetBATAVIA INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY: $4,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBELOVED ASHEVILLE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetK9 KONNECTION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SONOMA COUNTY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNION LEAGUE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETTER BOYS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KISKI SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAMILY MATTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds 29 PIECES ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP HIGHLANDS FOR BOYS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Russell Home For Atypical Children Inc ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER INC D/B/A HESED HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds HOLY FAMILY MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds FOX VALLEY FOOD FOR HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NIGHT MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds BETWEEN FRIENDS ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
  • Who funds KEEP AMERICA BEAUTIFUL INC ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND ANIMAL SHELTER NFP ↗
  • Who funds Toys for Texans ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE BROTHERS - FRIENDS OF THE ELDERLY ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH FLORIDA WILDLIFE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds RETREET ↗
  • Who funds CIRCESTEEM INC ↗
  • Who funds The Anti-Cruelty Society ↗
  • Who funds NORTH AURORA MOTHERS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds THE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER ↗
  • Who funds BREMEN YOUTH SERVICES ATTN DONALD SEBEK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL17.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Greater Chicago Food Depository · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · The Rhoades Foundation · Circle of Service Foundation · Carmax Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rachel B Williams Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rachel B Williams Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rachel B Williams Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Rachel B Williams Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rachel B Williams’ filings →

More from the funding graph