Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

R Wayne Teddy Family Foundation (F/K/A Jwc Foundation - Agy)

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$68k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0184% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20192025.

Food & Nutrition$79kEducation$73kHuman Services$65kYouth Development$51kInternational$50kAnimals$20kHealth$18kPhilanthropy$8kHousing & Shelter$5kOther$72k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $48k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOMEN OF VISION CHARLOTTE$20,000
THE LEARNING COLLABORATIVE$15,000
QUEENS UNIVERSITY OF CHARLOTTE$12,500
WING HAVEN FOUNDATION INCORPORATED$5,000
CHARLOTTE LATIN SCHOOL$5,000
GOOD FRIENDS$5,000
JANE'S FUND$2,500
THE NEST ACADEMY$1,000
BEDS FOR KIDS$1,000
VALENTINES DAY WIDOW OUTREACH$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT INC: $11k → 8%FOUNDATION FOR GIRLS: $15k → 10%FOUNDATION FOR GIRLS: $12k → 10%VALENTINES DAY WIDOW OUTREACH: $5k → 10%VALENTINES DAY WIDOW OUTREACH: $3k → 10%VALENTINES DAY WIDOW OUTREACH: $1k → 10%LOAVES & FISHES INC: $10k → 10%BEDS FOR KIDS: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 12% of R Wayne Teddy Family Foundation (F/K/A Jwc Foundation - Agy)’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

R Wayne Teddy Family Foundation (F/K/A Jwc Foundation - Agy)lessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$318k · 12 repeat orgs$72k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
12

Total granted

$318k
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+21%

Still filing today

92%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RB
    R Bruce Irons Camp Fund
    3× · 2020–2024 · $48k · revenue +136%
  • TL
    The Learning Collaborative
    3× · 2023–2025 · $40k · revenue +14%
  • WH
    Wing Haven Foundation Inc DBA Wing Haven Garden & Bird Sanctuary
    2× · 2023–2025 · $20k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • MT
    MEDI TEDDY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $12k
  • TG
    THE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT
    one grant, 2022 · $11k · revenue +1%
  • HH
    HOSPITALITY HOUSE OF CHARLOTTEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +38%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foster Village Charlotte

Foster Village Charlotte creates connection with dignity for children and families experiencing foster care by meeting urgent needs, providing educational and emotional support, and advocating as a collective community voice for children.

Human Services
2
Wnc Lighthouse Inc

The mission of WNC Lighthouse Inc is Changing lives, by being a light for Christ our Lord. Our vision is To be fully devoted to Jesus Christ, by opening our arms and providing Christian services to the underseved children, adults and…

Human Services
3
Refugee Hope Partners Inc

To engage, equip, and encourage our refugee neighbors so that all may thrive.

Human Services
4
Feeding Charlotte Inc

Feeding Charlotte rescues surplus, freshly prepared meals to reduce food waste and feed the hungry. We believe no food should be wasted while people go hungry in our community. To make this possible, we pickup unused, excess freshly…

Food & Nutrition
5
NourishNC Inc

NourishNC, Inc.'s goal is to provide healthy food to hungry children, empowering them to succeed in the classroom and in their community

Food & Nutrition
6
For Charlotte Inc

To unite the Church to transform the city through the power of the Gospel.

Religion
7
UrbanPromise Charlotte

Provide Charlotte's low-income children and youth with the academic, spiritual, and social development necessary to become Christian leaders determined to restore their communities.

Youth Development
8
Hearts United for Good Inc

Hearts United for Good strives to raise funds and awareness for organizations and people based in and around Charlotte, NC. We serve individuals and non-profit organizations in the greater Charlotte area through a variety of financial and…

Unclassified
9
KinderMourn Inc

KinderMourn offers individual counseling, couples counseling, and grief support groups to bereaved families at little to no cost. Clients self-identify what they feel comfortable with paying for individual counseling services, with over…

10
Bags of Hope

Bags of Hope seeks to bring hope to the Lake Norman and North Charlotte, NC, area by supplying free weekend food provisions to schoolchildren who experience food insecurity.

Food & Nutrition
11
Charlotte Family Housing

The mission of Charlotte Family Housing is to empower working families experiencing homelessness to achieve long-term self-sufficiency through shelter, housing, supportive services, and advocacy.

Human Services
12
House of Hope of Nc Inc

Home, Counseling & Support for Hurting Teens

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope and the most unlike its peers is Valentines Day Widow Outreach Co. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChristian Evangelical Minis…Military & First Responder …Volunteer Fire & Emergency …Economic Empowerment Progra…International Child & Commu…Youth Development and Enric…Healthcare Delivery Networks
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 9. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number31%9%<5yr20%27%5–10yr21%18%10–20yr12%14%20–35yr8%23%35–55yr9%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value31%5%<5yr20%23%5–10yr21%6%10–20yr12%27%20–35yr8%24%35–55yr9%15%55yr+

The field is 31% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 21% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
21%
1,442/6,903

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
17/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

The Harvest Center of Charlotte Inc — $75,000 · Food & NutritionThe Harvest Center o…LOAVES AND FISHES OF UNION COUNTY — $3,550 · Food & NutritionThe Learning Collaborative — $40,000 · EducationThe Learning Colla…Queens University of Charlotte — $25,000 · EducationQueens University …CHARLOTTE LATIN SCHOOLS — $5,000 · EducationCHARLOTTE LATIN SC…+2 more — $3,000 · EducationWOMEN OF VISION CHARLOTTE — $50,000 · OtherWOMEN OF VISION CHARLOTTEMEDI TEDDY INC — $11,747 · OtherMEDI TEDDY INCGood Friends — $6,000 · OtherGood FriendsHOSPITALITY HOUSE OF CHARLOTTE — $10,000 · OtherHOSPITALITY HOUSE OF CHARL…The Frankie Mae Foundation — $4,000 · OtherJANES FUND — $7,500 · OtherJANES FUNDFurnish For Good Inc — $5,000 · Other+4 more — $8,500 · Other+4 moreFoundation For Girls — $27,000 · Human ServicesFoundation For G…THE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT — $11,279 · Human ServicesTHE GREEN CHAIR …Nourish Up — $10,000 · Human ServicesNourish UpVALENTINES DAY WIDOW OUTREACH CO — $8,500 · Human ServicesVALENTINES DAY W…LEARNING HELP CENTERS OF CHARLOTTE — $7,000 · Human ServicesLEARNING HELP CE…+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesR Bruce Irons Camp Fund — $48,000 · Youth DevelopmentR Bruce Irons…THE HEARTLIGHT MINISTRIES FOUNDATION — $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentWORLD VISION INC — $30,000 · InternationalWORLD VISION…CONVOY OF HOPE — $20,000 · InternationalCONVOY OF HO…Wing Haven Foundation Inc DBA Wing Haven Garden & Bird Sanctuary — $20,200 · Animals
Food & Nutrition$78,550Education$73,000Other$102,747Human Services$64,779Youth Development$50,500International$50,000Animals$20,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Harvest Center of Charlotte Inc — $75,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetR Bruce Irons Camp Fund — $48,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetThe Learning Collaborative — $40,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetWORLD VISION INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation For Girls — $27,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetQueens University of Charlotte — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWing Haven Foundation Inc DBA Wing Haven Garden & Bird Sanctuary — $20,200 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCONVOY OF HOPE — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GREEN CHAIR PROJECT — $11,279 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHOSPITALITY HOUSE OF CHARLOTTE — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNourish Up — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVALENTINES DAY WIDOW OUTREACH CO — $8,500 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetJANES FUND — $7,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLEARNING HELP CENTERS OF CHARLOTTE — $7,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetGood Friends — $6,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCHARLOTTE LATIN SCHOOLS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFurnish For Good Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetThe Frankie Mae Foundation — $4,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetLOAVES AND FISHES OF UNION COUNTY — $3,550 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetMadelyns Fund — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE HEARTLIGHT MINISTRIES FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Isabella Santos Foundation — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for the CarolinasNC34.4× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · United Way of Greater Charlotte Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Speedway Children's Charities · Charlotte Woman's Club First Citizens Bank · Albemarle Foundation · The Greg and India Keith Foundation · The Eleanor H Barnhardt Charitable Trust · The LendingTree Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · Clt Host 2020 Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization R Wayne Teddy Family Foundation (F/K/A Jwc Foundation - Agy) funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph