Skip to content
Quincy Medical Group Healthcare Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Quincy Medical Group Healthcare Foundation

The QUINCY MEDICAL GROUP HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION will support the health and well-being of the individuals and communities we serve, foster community development initiatives, and provide resources for programs and partnerships.

$195k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$169kRecreation & Sports$38kReligion$31kFood & Nutrition$26kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kEducation$14k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $32,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $194,604 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $162,104 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HORIZONS SOCIAL SERVICES OF ADAMS COUNTY$25,000
QUINCY FAMILY YMCA$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%QUINCY FAMILY YMCA: $8k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$174k · 3 repeat orgs$120k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +1% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
7

Total granted

$174k
$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
-1%

Still filing today

100%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YO
    YWCA OF QUINCY IL
    3× · 2022–2024 · $139k · revenue +37%
  • TF
    THE FOOD BANK FOR CENTRAL & NORTHEAST MISSOURI
    3× · 2019–2021 · $20k · revenue +1%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF BAILEY PARK
    2× · 2021–2024 · $15k · revenue -87%

Funded once

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SPRINGFIELD
    one grant, 2018 · $31k
  • 2F
    2X4S FOR HOPE
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue -42%
  • CE
    CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $14k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Illinois Valley Food Pantry

Providing food to needy families in the illinois valley area.

Food & Nutrition
2
Central Illinois Services

To foster low income housing, develop and promote affordable homeownership and rental opportunities, support community develpment, social services, and educational opportunities for individuals and families throughout menard county and the…

—
3
Sauk Valley Foodbank

Our mission at the Sauk Valley Foodbank is to help alleviate food insecurity in the Sauk Valley area.

Food & Nutrition
4
Quincy Park Board Foundation

To provide for quincy, illinois parks and recreation

Recreation & Sports
5
Milan Christian Food Pantry

Providing food for people in need.

Food & Nutrition
6
Illinois Valley Ymca

To put christian principles into practice that build a healthy spirit, mind, and body for all.

Human Services
7
The Food Center

To provide food and household items to those in need in johnson county, missouri

Food & Nutrition
8
United Way of Central Illinois Inc

The united way of central illinois, inc. is a not-for-profit corporation with a mission to improve lives by uniting our community to adress the basic needs, education, financial stability and health of every person. vision: building…

Philanthropy
9
Dubuque Food Pantry

Dispense food to needy in the dubuque area

—
10
Food Bank of Iowa

The organization receives, warehouses, and distributes salvageable food items to non-profit tax exempt member agencies to feed the ill, needy, and infants.

Food & Nutrition
11
West Central Illinois Nutrition

Charitable services for the elderly

Food & Nutrition
12
Northern Il Helping Hands Food Pantry Nfp

To provide at least 2 days of food to needy families and people.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ywca of Quincy Il; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Bailey Park. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YWCA OF QUINCY IL: $138,621 · OtherYWCA OF QUINCY ILCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SPRINGFIELD: $31,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SPRINGFIELDCENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $14,488 · OtherCENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLHORIZONS SOCIAL SERVICES: $25,000 · Food & NutritionHORIZONS SOCIAL SER…THE FOOD BANK FOR CENTRAL & NORTHEAST MISSOURI: $20,000 · Food & NutritionTHE FOOD BANK FOR C…Central Illinois Foodbank Inc: $6,400 · Food & NutritionCentral Illinois Fo…JENSEN CAMP FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsMT STERLING COMMUNITY CENTER NFP: $5,250 · Recreation & Sports2X4S FOR HOPE: $15,000 · Public Safety & DisasterFRIENDS OF BAILEY PARK: $15,000 · Arts & CultureYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WEST CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $7,500 · Human ServicesSUNSET HOME: $5,000 · Health
Other$184,109Food & Nutrition$51,400Recreation & Sports$15,250Public Safety & Disaster$15,000Arts & Culture$15,000Human Services$7,500Health$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYWCA OF QUINCY IL: $138,621 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetHORIZONS SOCIAL SERVICES: $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK FOR CENTRAL & NORTHEAST MISSOURI: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget2X4S FOR HOPE: $15,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF BAILEY PARK: $15,000 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetJENSEN CAMP FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCentral Illinois Foodbank Inc: $6,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMT STERLING COMMUNITY CENTER NFP: $5,250 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSUNSET HOME: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …United Way of Adams C…The Jw Gardner II Fou…Michelmann FoundationKunes Family Foundati…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation of the Quincy AreaIL24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Quincy Area · United Way of Adams County Inc · The Jw Gardner II Foundation · Michelmann Foundation · Kunes Family Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Quincy Medical Group Healthcare Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Quincy Medical Group Healthcare Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Quincy Medical Group Healthcare’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home