Skip to content
Quiet Angel Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Quiet Angel Foundation

To meet the needs of underprivileged children.

$322k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$742kReligion$200kEducation$189kPublic Safety & Disaster$39kInternational$10kRecreation & Sports$10kAnimals$3kYouth Development$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $315,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $321,936 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $6,936 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $280k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION ARIZONA$200,000
ST CHARLES BORROMEO SCHOOL$80,000
SOCIETY OF CAMERA OPERATORS$15,000
STAND UP TO CANCER$10,000
NOTRE DAME PREPARATORY HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $208k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $3k → 9%ST CHARLES BORROMEO SCHOOL: $80k → 9%ST CHARLES BORROMEO SCHOOL: $75k → 9%ST CHARLES BORROMEO SCHOOL: $50k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OH
PA
CA
MD
AZ
KS
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 10 repeat orgs$68k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
10

Total granted

$1.4M
$68k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+51%

Still filing today

70%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesInternationalEducationHealthReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $762k · revenue +49%
  • SO
    Society of St Vincent DePaul St Charles Conference
    3× · 2023–2025 · $205k · revenue +54% · 85% of their budget
  • MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
    3× · 2019–2021 · $170k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • FT
    For The Global Glory of Godgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +51%
  • RC
    ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF FRESNO
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • IR
    INTERNATIONAL RESCUE MISSION FOR CHILDREN
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Grand Canyon Council Inc Boy Scouts of America

The mission of scouting america is to prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law. (continued on schedule o)programs of scouting america and grand…

—
2
Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit
3
World Wide Web Consortium Inc

Making the web work for everyone. W3C brings together global stakeholders to develop open standards that enable a World Wide Web that connects and empowers humanity.

Science & Tech
4
Boy Scouts of America Council 552 Pee Dee Area Council

The corporation shall promote, within the territory covered by the charter from time to time granted it by the boy scouts of america and in accordance with the congressional charter, bylaws, and rules and regulations of the boy scouts of…

—
5
American Culinary Federation Inc

Promoting excellence, education, professionalism and collegiality in the culinary profession

—
6
Boy Scouts of America Sagamore Council 162

The corporation shall promote, within the territory covered by the charter from time to time granted it by the boy scouts of america and in accordance with the congressional charter, bylaws, and rules and regulations of the boy scouts of…

—
7
Boys and Girls Club of Generational Empowerment

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Health
8
Make-a-Wish Foundation of the Mid-Atlantic Inc

The make-a-wish foundation of the mid-atlantic creates life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.

—
9
Boy Scouts of America Council No 604 Blue Mountain Council Inc

To promote, within the territory covered by the charter from time to time granted it by the boy scouts of america and in accordance with the congressional charter, bylaws, and rules and regulations of the boy scouts of america, the…

—
10
Young Men's Christian Association

The burbank community ymca (burbank y) is committed to strengthening the foundation of our community through youth development, healthy living, and social responsibility. we work within our community to ensure that everyone, regardless of…

Human Services
11
Make-a-Wish Foundation International

None

Human Services
12
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America; the most unlike its peers is Boys & Girls Clubs of St Thomas St John Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA INC: $761,664 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA INCMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $170,050 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERIC…EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN AMERICA: $159,500 · OtherEVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH IN A…Society of Camera Operators: $35,000 · OtherSociety of Camera OperatorsNotre Dame Preparatory High School: $20,000 · Other+5 more: $43,750 · Other+5 moreSociety of St Vincent DePaul St Charles Conference: $205,000 · Human ServicesSociety of St V…+1 more: $2,500 · Human ServicesWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $35,000 · International+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalSTAND UP TO CANCER: $20,453 · PhilanthropyCHARLOTTE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyARIZONA TUITION CONNECTION INC: $14,000 · EducationMY BROTHERS WORKSHOP INC: $10,000 · EducationFor The Global Glory of God: $20,000 · ReligionGirl Scouts of Greater NY Inc: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $450 · Youth Development
Health$761,664Other$428,300Human Services$207,500International$36,000Philanthropy$30,453Education$24,000Religion$20,000Youth Development$1,450

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA INC: $761,664 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetSociety of St Vincent DePaul St Charles Conference: $205,000 over 3y, 85% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $170,050 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSociety of Camera Operators: $35,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetSTAND UP TO CANCER: $20,453 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFor The Global Glory of God: $20,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetARIZONA TUITION CONNECTION INC: $14,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLOTTE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMY BROTHERS WORKSHOP INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLAYING FOR CHANGE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGirl Scouts of Greater NY Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable E…Natl Christian Charit…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Quiet Angel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Quiet Angel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Quiet Angel’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home