Skip to content

· Private foundation

Quadrex Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$501
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$6kInternational$5kEducation$3kHuman Services$1kHousing & Shelter$1kReligion$900Youth Development$625Food & Nutrition$485Other$0
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$101
Median grant
11
States reached
$123k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$501
Individual grant recipient$400
GLOBAL NAGRI FOUNDATION INC$251
FRIENDS OF THE GOLETA PUB LIBRARY$201
HOSPICE OF SANTA BARBARA$151
Individual grant recipient$151
SANTA BARBARA EDUCATION FDN$151
THE LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$151
SCHOLARSHIP FD OF SANTA BARBARA$151
DIRECT RELIEF$151
CANCER FOUNDATION$151
Individual grant recipient$111
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$111
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$111
FOOD BANK OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY$111
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KIDS WISH NETWORK: $111 → 12%VETERANS RELIEF NETWORK: $111 → 15%GLOBAL NAGARI FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 11%KIDS WISH NETWORK: $101 → 12%VETERANS RELIEF NETWORK: $101 → 15%GLOBAL NAGRI FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 11%VETERANS RELIEF NETWORK: $51 → 15%GLOBAL NAGRI FOUNDATION INC: $251 → 11%VETERANS RELIEF NETWORK: $51 → 15%GLOBAL NAGRI FOUNDATION INC: $201 → 11%BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $101 → 14%BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $101 → 14%UNITY SHOPPE: $111 → 14%UNITY SHOPPE: $101 → 14%UNITY SHOPPE: $51 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
IA
IN
NJ
CA
VA
MD
KS
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16k · 48 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

48 repeat relationships: 34 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

48
12

Total granted

$16k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+19%

Still filing today

50%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthInternationalEducationReligionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $723 · revenue +1%
  • HO
    HOSPICE OF SANTA BARBARA INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $514 · revenue +28%
  • VR
    VETERANS RELIEF NETWORK INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $314 · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -14%
  • MV
    MINNESOTA VIPASSANA ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2021 · $600 · revenue +19%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $522
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
2
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
5
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
6
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
7
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
8
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
9
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
10
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
11
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
12
Scripps Health

Founded in 1924 by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps, Scripps Health is a $4.9 billion, private not-for-profit integrated health system in San Diego, Ca. (see Sch O)

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is Minnesota Vipassana Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
18/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $673 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAM BREAST CANCER SUPPORT ASSN: $625 · OtherAM BREAST CANCER SUPPORT ASSNFRIENDS OF THE GOLETA PUB LIBRARY: $614 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE GOLETA PUB LIBRARYSCHOLARSHIP FD OF SANTA BARBARA: $604 · OtherSCHOLARSHIP FD OF SANTA BARBARAIndividual grant recipient: $522 · OtherHOSPICE OF SANTA BARBARA INC: $514 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $501 · OtherBICYCLE BOB'S OF SANTA BARBARA: $474 · OtherST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEACH HOSPITAL: $474 · OtherBRANDON SCHOOL PTA: $461 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $434 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $400 · OtherFoodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc: $434 · Other+31 more: $4,358 · Other+31 moreGLOBALNAGARI FOUNDATION INC: $2,455 · Human ServicesGLOBALNAGARI FOUNDAT…VETERANS RELIEF NETWORK INC: $314 · Human ServicesVETERANS RELIEF NETW…UNITY SHOPPE INC: $263 · Human ServicesUNITY SHOPPE INCKIDS WISH NETWORK INC: $212 · Human ServicesKIDS WISH NETWORK IN…BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC: $202 · Human ServicesBRAILLE INSTITUTE OF…COVENANT HOUSE: $153 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $133 · Human ServicesPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $1,001 · HealthPARTNERS IN H…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $434 · HealthALZHEIMER'S D…CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $253 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI …SANSUM CLINIC: $253 · HealthSANSUM CLINICBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $253 · HealthBLOOD CANCER …UNITED CANCER SUPPORT FOUNDATION INC: $153 · HealthUNITED CANCER…MARCH OF DIMES INC: $102 · HealthMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $723 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF: $302 · InternationalOPERATION SMILE INC: $200 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $153 · InternationalSanta Barbara Education Foundation: $302 · EducationTrustees of Tufts College: $212 · EducationBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $212 · EducationMINNESOTA VIPASSANA ASSOCIATION: $600 · ReligionSANTA BARBARA RESCUE MISSION: $547 · Housing & Shelter
Other$11,088Human Services$3,732Health$2,449International$1,378Education$726Religion$600Housing & Shelter$547

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGLOBALNAGARI FOUNDATION INC: $2,455 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $1,001 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $723 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA VIPASSANA ASSOCIATION: $600 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSANTA BARBARA RESCUE MISSION: $547 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF SANTA BARBARA INC: $514 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $434 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFoodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc: $434 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVETERANS RELIEF NETWORK INC: $314 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSanta Barbara Education Foundation: $302 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $302 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITY SHOPPE INC: $263 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $253 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSANSUM CLINIC: $253 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $253 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $212 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS WISH NETWORK INC: $212 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $212 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIKES NOT BOMBS INC: $212 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC: $202 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $153 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $153 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $133 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $102 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGAVIOTA COAST CONSERVANCY: $102 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $91 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GLOBALNAGARI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA VIPASSANA ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF SANTA BARBARA INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc ↗
  • Who funds VETERANS RELIEF NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Santa Barbara Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds UNITY SHOPPE INC ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SANSUM CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
  • Who funds KIDS WISH NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BIKES NOT BOMBS INC ↗
  • Who funds BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

James S Bower FoundationCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: James S Bower Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Quadrex Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Quadrex Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Brandeis University: 9% of income from government
  • Bikes Not Bombs Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Quadrex’s filings →

More from the funding graph