Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Pyles & Turner Foundation Inc

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$11k
Granted FY2023
12
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 70% of PYLES & TURNER FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2023 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$800
Median grant
1
States reached
$134k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WV FUND FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INT$1,500
WV RIVERS COALITION$1,500
SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN LABOR SCHOOL$1,350
LOGAN AREA PUBLIC LIBRARY$1,000
Individual grant recipient$800
GREENBRIER RIVER WATERSHED ASSOC$800
WV MINE WARS MUSEUM$800
Individual grant recipient$750
RUPERT PUBLIC LIBRARY$500
CHILDREN'S THERAPY CLINIC$500
Individual grant recipient$500
CHILD & YOUTH ADVOCACY CENTER$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 18%Greenbrier County Committee on Aging: $500 → 18%Greenbrier County Committee on Aging: $500 → 18%Greenbrier County Committee on Aging: $500 → 18%Northern Greenbrier Latchkey: $750 → 18%Northern Greenbrier Latchkey: $500 → 18%Northern Greenbrier Latchkey: $500 → 18%Northern Greenbrier Latchkey: $500 → 18%Northern Greenbrier Latchkey Kids: $500 → 18%Child & Youth Advoacy Center: $1k → 18%Child & Youth Advoacy Center: $800 → 18%Child and Youth Advocacy Center: $750 → 18%Childrens Home Society: $500 → 18%CHILD & YOUTH ADVOCACY CENTER: $500 → 18%Childrens Home Society: $500 → 18%Renick Community Center: $400 → 18%Renick Community Center: $300 → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 7% of Pyles & Turner Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in WV; read by stated purpose it is 92% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Pyles & Turner Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$67k · 19 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2023, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
14

Total granted

$67k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+24%

Still filing today

53%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEnvironmentCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA RIVERS COALITION INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $10k · revenue +311%
  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA FUND FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST
    6× · 2017–2022 · $9k · revenue +210%
  • CA
    Child and Youth Advocacy Center
    4× · 2017–2023 · $3k · revenue +122%

Funded once

  • HR
    Health Right Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • RG
    Recovery Group of Southern WV
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wayne County Community Services Organization

Establish, conduct, implement, operate, coordinate and finance programs for the benefit of the low-income, minority, elderly, disadvantaged and handicapped citizens of wayne county, wv

Community Improvement
2
Walker County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc

Walker County Childrens Advocacy Center, Inc. will provide services to child victims of physical and sexual abuse, severely neglected children and children who have witnessed a violent crime. The Center will work every day to try and stop…

Human Services
3
Central West Virginia Aging Services Inc

Provide homemaker and case management services to home-bound seniors and disabled members in west virginia. provide, also, training and job assistance to those 55 and older on a limited income.

Human Services
4
Summers County Council on Aging Inc

Provide services to senior citizens of Summers County, West Virginia.

Human Services
5
Appalachian Childrens Center Inc

Serve abused and/or neglected children in the Gilmer County area via counseling and other social services.

Recreation & Sports
6
Wv Helping Hands
Human Services
7
Logan-Mingo Area Mental Health Inc

To collectively strengthen integrated behavioral and primary healthcare system by providing a continuum of services to the community that is responsive, accessible, and high-quality.

Health
8
Autism Services Center Inc

Provide comprehensive community integrated services for individuals with developmental disabilities

Health
9
Greenbrier County Health Alliance

Work collaboratively to assess local needs, remove barriers to health equity, and inform action through environmental,systems,and policy change. we approach through a social determinants of health lens,and implement projects following…

Health
10
Virginias House a Family Resource Center
Human Services
11
Mountainheart

Mountainheart community services, inc. provides services to the low income and elderly citizens of west virginia through head start, child care, right from the start, weatherization, birth to three and in-home care programs.

Community Improvement
12
Graham County Rehabilitaion Center Inc

Provides support and services to individuals from 5 years to seniors with developmental disabilities and/or phsyical limitations.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Virginia Health Right Inc and the most unlike its peers is Almost Heaven Habitat for Humanity. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WEST VIRGINIA FUND FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST — $8,600 · OtherWEST VIRGINIA FUND FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTERESTLogan Area Public Library — $7,450 · OtherLogan Area Public LibrarySouthern Appalachian Labor School Foundation Inc — $7,350 · OtherSouthern Appalachian Labor School Foundation IncWEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC — $6,800 · OtherWEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INCHigh Rocks for Girls — $4,500 · OtherHigh Rocks for GirlsWV Mine Wars Museum — $2,450 · OtherGREENBRIER RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION INC — $2,350 · OtherHealth Right Inc — $2,000 · OtherGreenbrier County Communities in Schools — $1,850 · Other+16 more — $12,050 · Other+16 moreWEST VIRGINIA RIVERS COALITION INC — $10,100 · EnvironmentWEST VIRGINIA …Child and Youth Advocacy Center — $3,050 · Human ServicesChild and You…NORTHERN GREENBRIER LATCHKEY KIDS — $2,750 · Human ServicesNORTHERN GREE…GREENBRIER COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING INC — $1,500 · Human ServicesGREENBRIER CO…THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'…RENICK COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $700 · Human ServicesRENICK COMMUN…CHILDRENS THERAPY CLINIC — $1,500 · HealthKANAWHA COUNTY DENTAL HEALTH COUNCIL INC — $750 · HealthLOGAN COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER — $750 · Crime & LegalALMOST HEAVEN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $500 · Housing & ShelterGREENBRIER HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $250 · Arts & CultureMONROE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $100 · Arts & Culture
Other$55,400Environment$10,100Human Services$9,000Health$2,250Crime & Legal$750Housing & Shelter$500Arts & Culture$350

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWEST VIRGINIA RIVERS COALITION INC — $10,100 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA FUND FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST — $8,600 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetSouthern Appalachian Labor School Foundation Inc — $7,350 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC — $6,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetChild and Youth Advocacy Center — $3,050 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHERN GREENBRIER LATCHKEY KIDS — $2,750 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetGREENBRIER COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING INC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDRENS THERAPY CLINIC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWELLSPRING OF GREENBRIER INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOGAN COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER — $750 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKANAWHA COUNTY DENTAL HEALTH COUNCIL INC — $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALMOST HEAVEN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREENBRIER HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCommunities In Schools of Greenbrier County Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA RIVERS COALITION INC
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA FUND FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST
  • Who funds Southern Appalachian Labor School Foundation Inc
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA HEALTH RIGHT INC
  • Who funds Child and Youth Advocacy Center
  • Who funds NORTHERN GREENBRIER LATCHKEY KIDS
  • Who funds GREENBRIER COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING INC
  • Who funds CHILDRENS THERAPY CLINIC
  • Who funds WELLSPRING OF GREENBRIER INC
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF WEST VIRGINIA INC
  • Who funds LOGAN COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER
  • Who funds KANAWHA COUNTY DENTAL HEALTH COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds RENICK COMMUNITY CENTER INC
  • Who funds ALMOST HEAVEN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
  • Who funds GREENBRIER HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds GATEWAY INDUSTRIES INC
  • Who funds Communities In Schools of Greenbrier County Inc
  • Who funds MONROE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Kanawha Valley FoundationWV26× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Hollowell Dawkins Foundation Inc · The Daywood Foundationinc · The Jeanne G Hamilton and Lawson W Hamilton Jr Family Foundation Inc · Robertson Family Foundation Inc · United Way of the Greenbrier Valley Inc · Tgkvf Inc · Marie Leist Foundation Inc · Mary B Nickell Foundation Inc · Pallottine Foundation of Huntington West Virginia · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pyles & Turner Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pyles & Turner Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Pyles & Turner Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph