Skip to content

California · Private foundation

Pure Good Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$549k
Granted FY2019
18
Grants FY2019
16
Organizations funded FY2019
44%
First-time grantees FY2019
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

63% of Pure Good Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to American Online Giving Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year Pure Good Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $549k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
’17
14
’18
10
’19
7
’20
4
’21
2
’22
4
’23
7
’24
1
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2019
$8,875
Largest grant, FY2019
$150,000
Organizations funded a year
16 to 23
FY2017 to FY2019
States reached, FY2019
7
Total assets, FY2019
$18M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2019, 44% of the organizations Pure Good Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 40% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $185k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesPublic BenefitInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY201916$463k44%
FY201823$398k74%
FY201716$209kn/a
92% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$7.3MEducation$840kRecreation & Sports$423kYouth Development$182kHuman Services$105kInternational$99kHealth$66kEnvironment$37kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
IL
NY
OR
WY
NJ
CA
UT
CO
MD
DE
AZ
TN
NC
DC
HI
LA
GA
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Team4tech Foundation$454,500414%
Kaboom Inc$392,25051%
Rewriting the Code Inc$300,00013%
Boys & Girls Club of Hawaii$150,00013%
Globalgiving Foundation Inc$77,67440%
Kidspire$75,00026%
Visit Org Philanthropic Foundation$31,56320%
Project Helping$26,58321%
Urban Green Lab$25,00013%
Aim High$25,0001n/a
Show all 34 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 26 recipients with no EIN on record ($1.8M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Pure Good Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTeam4tech Foundation: $454,500 over 4y, 14% of budgetKaboom Inc: $392,250 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetRewriting the Code Inc: $300,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of Hawaii: $150,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetGlobalgiving Foundation Inc: $77,674 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKidspire: $75,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetVisit Org Philanthropic Foundation: $31,563 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetProject Helping: $26,583 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetUrban Green Lab: $25,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetThe Michael Phelps Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetSan Francisco AIDS Foundation: $21,037 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Please Foundation: $17,711 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetThe Mikes Bikes Foundation: $11,250 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetSpark Program Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLifemoves: $7,741 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWine to Water: $5,790 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of America: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEducation Outside: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDown Syndrome Connection of the Bay Area: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNeighborhood Forest Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFriends of the Orphans D/B/A Nph-Usa: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetResource Area for Teaching: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOur Family Coalition: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThanksgiving Heroes Slc: $3,100 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetGuide Dogs for the Blind Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNmdp Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Metro Denver Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Silicon Valley Leadership Group Foundation: $2,133 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOne Tree Planted Inc: $1,410 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRavenswood Education Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Lung Association: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 31.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA19× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Atkinson Foundation · LPL Financial Foundation Inc · Tides Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · AbbVie Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Pure Good Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Pure Good Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Pure Good Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Pure Good Foundation

How much does Pure Good Foundation give?
Pure Good Foundation reported 18 grants totaling $549,009 in its FY2019 IRS filing. It funded between 16 and 23 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2019.
What does Pure Good Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Philanthropy (78%), Education (9%), Recreation & Sports (5%).
Who are Pure Good Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Team4tech Foundation ($455k), Kaboom Inc ($392k), Rewriting the Code Inc ($300k).
Does Pure Good Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2019, 44% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Pure Good Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Pure Good Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Silicon Valley Community Foundation, Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc, Atkinson Foundation.
Where is Pure Good Foundation based?
Pure Good Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Pure Good’s filings →

More from the funding graph