Skip to content

· Private foundation

Puder Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$54k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$66kEducation$49kPhilanthropy$49kReligion$37kHuman Services$8kHealth$4kAnimals$2kCrime & Legal$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $32k
$1,250
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
URBAN GLASS$22,180
Individual grant recipient$10,000
POLY PREP COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL$6,500
IBIS FRIENDS OF VETERANS$2,500
MEYER ACADEMY$2,500
ALPERT FAMILY AND JEWISH SERVICES$2,500
NEWARK ACADEMY$1,500
IBIS CHARITIES$1,250
GLASS ROOTS$1,000
INNOCENCE PROJECT OF FLORIDA$1,000
TEMPLE B'NAI JESHURUN$960
BEREAN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$750
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$500
NY PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC$500
PBGYAA$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHASIN A DREAM: $750 → 11%JESPY HOUSE: $518 → 16%LIVE LIKE JAKE: $250 → 11%JESPY HOUSE: $500 → 16%JESPY HOUSE: $500 → 16%INNOCENT PROJECT: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
NY
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$195k · 23 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
26

Total granted

$195k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+83%

Still filing today

39%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UN
    URBANGLASS NEW YORK CONTEMPORARY GLASS CENTER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $62k · revenue +55%
  • PP
    POLY PREP COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL
    5× · 2021–2025 · $26k · revenue +19%
  • NA
    NEWARK ACADEMY
    4× · 2021–2025 · $8k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • A
    AEIF
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • PP
    POLY PREP COUNTY DAY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • AJ
    ALBERT JEWISH FAMILY CHILDREN'S SERVICE
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ny Police and Fire Widows' & Children's Benefit Fund Inc

Brief description of the organization's mission the purpose of the fund is to provide assistance to the families of new york city police officers and firefighters who have been killed in the line of duty. after the events of september 11,…

Human Services
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
4
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
5
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
7
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
William Paterson University of New Jersey Foundation Inc

The mission of the william paterson university of new jersey foundation, inc. is dedicated to secure philanthropic funding through the identification and pursuit of private gifts, grants, and endowments. the foundation will be the steward…

—
11
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Newark Academy; the most unlike its peers is Winhall Fire Department Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
19/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AIEF: $20,000 · OtherAIEFIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KORET ISRAEL: $10,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KORET ISRAELCONGREGATION BNAI JESHURUN: $8,568 · OtherCONGREGATION BNAI JESHURUNIBIS CHARITIES: $5,700 · OtherIBIS CHARITIESMEYER ACADEMY: $5,500 · OtherMEYER ACADEMYAEIF: $5,000 · OtherALPERT FAMILY AND JEWISH SERVICES: $5,000 · OtherIBIS FRIENDS OF VETERANS: $3,600 · Other+28 more: $22,686 · Other+28 moreURBANGLASS NEW YORK CONTEMPORARY GLASS CENTER INC: $62,392 · Arts & CultureURBANGLASS NEW YORK CONTEMPORARY…+1 more: $500 · Arts & CulturePOLY PREP COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $25,500 · EducationPOLY PREP COUNTRY DAY…NEWARK ACADEMY: $7,500 · EducationNEWARK ACADEMYCONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $5,000 · EducationCONNECTICUT COLLEGEMRCC FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationTHE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND: $4,000 · PhilanthropyPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $2,000 · HealthSHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $500 · HealthALPHA-1 FOUNDATION INC: $500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $500 · HealthJESPY HOUSE INC: $1,518 · Human ServicesCHASIN A DREAM FOUNDATION INC: $750 · Human ServicesTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $500 · Human ServicesLIVE LIKE JAKE FOUNDATION INC: $250 · Human ServicesGLASSROOTS INC: $3,000 · Youth Development
Other$101,054Arts & Culture$62,892Education$40,500Philanthropy$4,000Health$3,500Human Services$3,018Youth Development$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetURBANGLASS NEW YORK CONTEMPORARY GLASS CENTER INC: $62,392 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetPOLY PREP COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $25,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEWARK ACADEMY: $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGLASSROOTS INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMRCC FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJESPY HOUSE INC: $1,518 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS OF WAR INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHASIN A DREAM FOUNDATION INC: $750 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget4 CHAIRS THEATRE: $500 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetALPHA-1 FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVE LIKE JAKE FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWinhall Fire Department Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTH ORANGE RESCUE SQUAD INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds URBANGLASS NEW YORK CONTEMPORARY GLASS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds POLY PREP COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds NEWARK ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND ↗
  • Who funds GLASSROOTS INC ↗
  • Who funds MRCC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds JESPY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds PAWS OF WAR INC ↗
  • Who funds INNOCENCE PROJECT OF FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHASIN A DREAM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY19× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · The Miller Family Foundation · Lvh Foundation · The Florin Family Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Puder Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Puder Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Innocence Project of Florida Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Glassroots Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation: 2% of income from government
  • Jespy House Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Connecticut College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Puder Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Puder Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Puder’s filings →

More from the funding graph