Skip to content
Psi Iota XI Charities Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Psi Iota XI Charities Inc

To accept donations of property and sell the same; with the income to be distributed for philanthropic purposes to local charitable organizations

$64k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$104kHuman Services$94kArts & Culture$58kHousing & Shelter$28kCommunity Improvement$27kReligion$19kCrime & Legal$11k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $39,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $63,666 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $24,666 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
A BETTER WAY SERVICES$20,000
YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA OF ECI$10,000
URBAN LIGHT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT$9,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 20%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 20%ISAIAH 117 HOUSE: $16k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$224k · 5 repeat orgs$115k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
7

Total granted

$224k
$105k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+25%

Still filing today

60%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureCrime & LegalReligionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AB
    A BETTER WAY SERVICES INC
    5× · 2018–2025 · $79k · revenue +239%
  • PI
    PSI IOTA XI SORORITY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $74k
  • PI
    PSI IOTA XI ALPHA CHAPTER
    2× · 2022–2023 · $30k

Funded once

  • EC
    EAST CENTRAL NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $27k
  • CM
    CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES OF DELAWAREgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +66%
  • DC
    DELAWARE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $16k · revenue -73%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Muncie-Delaware County Chamber of Commerce

To be an action-oriented, visionary organization which will stimulate progress, foster economic growth and enhance individual opportunity to achieve a high quality of life for everyone.

—
2
Indiana United Methodist Children's Home Foundation Inc

To support the charitable, educational and other exempt purposes of the indiana united methodist children's home, inc.

Philanthropy
3
Webster City Day Care

Child day care center

—
4
Children's Advocacy Center of Delaware

To reduce the devastating long-term effects that child abuse has on children, their families and society through immediate, coordinated, child focused services, education, and advocacy.

Human Services
5
United Church Home

To provide a safe home for runaway and homeless youth in a dignified, respectful environment empowering each individual towards self-sufficiency.

—
6
Community Childcare of Manchester Iowa

Child care services

Education
7
Community United Child Care Centers Inc

Our mission is to provide quality child care in a warm and nurturing atmosphere. we offer developmentally appropriate activities in small and large group settings designed to enhance the social, emotional, intellectual, language, and…

Human Services
8
Central Christian Child Development Center Inc

An educational organization operated exclusively for charitable purposes and conducts child care activities that allow parents to seek and hold employment.

Human Services
9
Dayton Christian Center Inc

To promote community by nuturing children and empowering familites in a christian environment by providing childcare services and supportive services for families.

Religion
10
Bridges Community Services Inc

To develop, coordinate, and proivde housing, social services, and educational programs for low income and moderate income residents of muncie, indiana.

—
11
Christ Church Day Care Inc

Building a stronger tomorrow through nurturing today.

Education
12
Community Care in Union County Inc Community Care in Union County Inc

Provide child care and supporting family services to families in union county, indiana.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth Opportunity Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Christian Ministries of Delaware. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

A BETTER WAY SERVICES INC: $78,800 · OtherA BETTER WAY SERVICES INCPSI IOTA XI SORORITY: $73,500 · OtherPSI IOTA XI SORORITYPSI IOTA XI ALPHA CHAPTER: $30,000 · OtherPSI IOTA XI ALPHA CHAPTEREAST CENTRAL NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION INC: $27,200 · OtherEAST CENTRAL NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION INCCORNERSTONE CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $22,939 · OtherCORNERSTONE CENTER FOR THE ARTS INCCHRISTIAN MINISTRIES OF DELAWARE: $20,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN MINISTRIES OF DELAWAREYOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA OF EAST CENTRAL INDIANA: $10,000 · Other+1 more: $6,600 · OtherDELAWARE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $16,000 · Arts & CultureMUNCIE CIVIC THEATRE: $9,000 · Arts & CultureURBAN LIGHT CHRISTIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $18,500 · ReligionISAIAH 117 HOUSE: $16,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH OPPORTUNITY CENTER INC: $10,600 · Crime & Legal
Other$269,039Arts & Culture$25,000Religion$18,500Human Services$16,000Crime & Legal$10,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetA BETTER WAY SERVICES INC: $78,800 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetCORNERSTONE CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $22,939 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCHRISTIAN MINISTRIES OF DELAWARE: $20,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetURBAN LIGHT CHRISTIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $18,500 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetISAIAH 117 HOUSE: $16,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH OPPORTUNITY CENTER INC: $10,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA OF EAST CENTRAL INDIANA: $10,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetMUNCIE CIVIC THEATRE: $9,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED DAY CARE CENTER: $6,600 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…Ball Brothers Foundat…George and Frances Ba…Heart of Indiana Unit…Hamer D & Phyllis C S…Mutualbank Charitable…Sherman and Marjorie …Community Foundation …Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Community Foundation of Muncie and Delaware County IncIN24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Muncie and Delaware County Inc · Ball Brothers Foundation · George and Frances Ball Foundation · Heart of Indiana United Way Inc · Hamer D & Phyllis C Shafer Foundation Charitable Trust · Mutualbank Charitable Foundation Inc · Sherman and Marjorie Zeigler Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Randolph County Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Psi Iota XI Charities Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Psi Iota XI Charities Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Psi Iota XI Charities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home