· Public charity
Psi Iota XI Charities Inc
To accept donations of property and sell the same; with the income to be distributed for philanthropic purposes to local charitable organizations
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 3 grants below total $39,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $63,666 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $24,666 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| A BETTER WAY SERVICES | $20,000 |
| YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA OF ECI | $10,000 |
| URBAN LIGHT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT | $9,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 20%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +1% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ABA BETTER WAY SERVICES INC5× · 2018–2025 · $79k · revenue +239%
- PIPSI IOTA XI SORORITY4× · 2017–2020 · $74k
- PIPSI IOTA XI ALPHA CHAPTER2× · 2022–2023 · $30k
Funded once
- ECEAST CENTRAL NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION INCone grant, 2022 · $27k
- CMCHRISTIAN MINISTRIES OF DELAWAREgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +66%
- DCDELAWARE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INCone grant, 2024 · $16k · revenue -73%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To be an action-oriented, visionary organization which will stimulate progress, foster economic growth and enhance individual opportunity to achieve a high quality of life for everyone.
To support the charitable, educational and other exempt purposes of the indiana united methodist children's home, inc.
Child day care center
To reduce the devastating long-term effects that child abuse has on children, their families and society through immediate, coordinated, child focused services, education, and advocacy.
To provide a safe home for runaway and homeless youth in a dignified, respectful environment empowering each individual towards self-sufficiency.
Child care services
Our mission is to provide quality child care in a warm and nurturing atmosphere. we offer developmentally appropriate activities in small and large group settings designed to enhance the social, emotional, intellectual, language, and…
An educational organization operated exclusively for charitable purposes and conducts child care activities that allow parents to seek and hold employment.
To promote community by nuturing children and empowering familites in a christian environment by providing childcare services and supportive services for families.
To develop, coordinate, and proivde housing, social services, and educational programs for low income and moderate income residents of muncie, indiana.
Building a stronger tomorrow through nurturing today.
Provide child care and supporting family services to families in union county, indiana.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth Opportunity Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Christian Ministries of Delaware. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds A BETTER WAY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CORNERSTONE CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES OF DELAWARE ↗
- Who funds URBAN LIGHT CHRISTIAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds DELAWARE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds ISAIAH 117 HOUSE ↗
- Who funds YOUTH OPPORTUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA OF EAST CENTRAL INDIANA ↗
- Who funds MUNCIE CIVIC THEATRE ↗
- Who funds UNITED DAY CARE CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Muncie and Delaware County Inc · Ball Brothers Foundation · George and Frances Ball Foundation · Heart of Indiana United Way Inc · Hamer D & Phyllis C Shafer Foundation Charitable Trust · Mutualbank Charitable Foundation Inc · Sherman and Marjorie Zeigler Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Randolph County Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Psi Iota XI Charities Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.