Skip to content

Indiana · Private foundation

Sherman and Marjorie Zeigler Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$801k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
24
Grants FY2025
15
Organizations funded FY2024
20%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$7,500
Largest grant, FY2025
$240,000
Organizations funded a year
8 to 19
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$12M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 20% of the organizations Sherman and Marjorie Zeigler Foundation Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 29% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $127k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving22$556k14%
FY202415$435k20%
FY202319$458k42%
FY202216$650k19%
FY202119$679k32%
FY202017$406k41%
FY201912$306k33%
FY20188$42kn/a
97% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Community Improvement$1.7MPhilanthropy$1.1MEnvironment$605kRecreation & Sports$399kArts & Culture$302kHuman Services$266kPublic Benefit$134kEducation$129kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Community Enhancement Projects Inc$1,331,625860%
Cardinal Greenway Inc$308,02089%
Muncie Downtown Dev Partnership$254,000711%
Red-Tail Land Conservancy Inc$253,136712%
Ross Community Center Inc$165,700312%
City of Muncie-Mayor's Office$134,0004n/a
Young Men's Christian Association of Muncie Indiana Inc$100,00011%
Muncie Children's Museum Inc$95,00021%
Ivy Tech Foundation Inc$50,00010%
Muncie Public Library$50,0001n/a
Show all 28 grantees
All grantees of Sherman and Marjorie Zeigler Foundation Inc by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Community Enhancement Projects Inc$1,331,625860%
Cardinal Greenway Inc$308,02089%
Muncie Downtown Dev Partnership$254,000711%
Red-Tail Land Conservancy Inc$253,136712%
Ross Community Center Inc$165,700312%
City of Muncie-Mayor's Office$134,0004n/a
Young Men's Christian Association of Muncie Indiana Inc$100,00011%
Muncie Children's Museum Inc$95,00021%
Ivy Tech Foundation Inc$50,00010%
Muncie Public Library$50,0001n/a
Urban Light Christian Development Corporation$47,0001n/a
Halteman Village Neighborhood Association Inc$45,5002n/a
Delaware County Historical Society Inc$43,700810%
Martin Luther King Dream Team$37,0001n/a
Whitely Community Council Inc$35,76523%
Earlham College Inc$26,46620%
Hoosier Environmental Council Inc$25,00012%
Ball State University Foundation Inc$25,00010%
Orchestra Indiana Inc$23,00042%
Cornerstone Center for the Arts Inc$18,00013%
The Conservation Law Center Inc$14,00030%
The Academy of Model Aeronautics Inc$13,0001n/a
Indiana State Museum Foundation Inc$11,50080%
Indiana Historical Society$11,50080%
Muncie Arts & Culture Council Inc$11,00043%
Muncie Action Plan Inc$8,55544%
Motivate Our Minds Inc$4,00011%
East Central Neighborhood Association Inc$2,0001n/a

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 14 recipients with no EIN on record ($388k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Sherman and Marjorie Zeigler Foundation Inc supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 21 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCommunity Enhancement Projects Inc: $1,331,625 over 8y, 60% of budgetCardinal Greenway Inc: $308,020 over 8y, 9.2% of budgetMuncie Downtown Dev Partnership: $254,000 over 7y, 11% of budgetRed-Tail Land Conservancy Inc: $253,136 over 7y, 12% of budgetRoss Community Center Inc: $165,700 over 3y, 12% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Muncie Indiana Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMuncie Children's Museum Inc: $95,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetIvy Tech Foundation Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDelaware County Historical Society Inc: $43,700 over 8y, 10% of budgetWhitely Community Council Inc: $35,765 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetEarlham College Inc: $26,466 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHoosier Environmental Council Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBall State University Foundation Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOrchestra Indiana Inc: $23,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetCornerstone Center for the Arts Inc: $18,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetThe Conservation Law Center Inc: $14,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetIndiana State Museum Foundation Inc: $11,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetIndiana Historical Society: $11,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMuncie Arts & Culture Council Inc: $11,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetMuncie Action Plan Inc: $8,555 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetMotivate Our Minds Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 21.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ball Brothers FoundationIN45.2× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ball Brothers Foundation · George and Frances Ball Foundation · The Community Foundation of Muncie and Delaware County Inc · Mutualbank Charitable Foundation Inc · Hamer D & Phyllis C Shafer Foundation Charitable Trust · Heart of Indiana United Way Inc · American Electric Power Foundation · Muncie Endurathon Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Edmund F and Virginia B Ball Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Sherman and Marjorie Zeigler Foundation Inc with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sherman and Marjorie Zeigler Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Sherman and Marjorie Zeigler Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Sherman and Marjorie Zeigler Foundation Inc

How much does Sherman and Marjorie Zeigler Foundation Inc give?
Sherman and Marjorie Zeigler Foundation Inc reported 24 grants totaling $800,916 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 8 and 19 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Sherman and Marjorie Zeigler Foundation Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2025, its largest causes are Community Improvement (36%), Philanthropy (23%), Environment (12%).
Who are Sherman and Marjorie Zeigler Foundation Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2025: Community Enhancement Projects Inc ($1.3M), Cardinal Greenway Inc ($308k), Muncie Downtown Dev Partnership ($254k).
Does Sherman and Marjorie Zeigler Foundation Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 20% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Sherman and Marjorie Zeigler Foundation Inc accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Sherman and Marjorie Zeigler Foundation Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Ball Brothers Foundation, George and Frances Ball Foundation, The Community Foundation of Muncie and Delaware County Inc.
Where is Sherman and Marjorie Zeigler Foundation Inc based?
Sherman and Marjorie Zeigler Foundation Inc is based in IN.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sherman and Marjorie Zeigler’s filings →

More from the funding graph