Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Psalm 103 Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$54k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What you fund
0182% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Religion$215kInternational$43kYouth Development$12kHuman Services$10kFood & Nutrition$8kPublic Safety & Disaster$3kHealth$3kPhilanthropy$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k25 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $23k
$850
Median grant
8
States reached
$8k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CROSSING CHURCH$22,800
CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST (CRU)$8,900
COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL$3,899
Individual grant recipient$2,400
FOOD BANK FOR CENTRAL AND NORTHEAST MISSOURI$2,010
FAMILY HOPE INTERNATIONAL$1,850
BIG HORN MINISTRIES$1,200
Individual grant recipient$1,200
COYOTE HILL CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME$1,000
SAMARITANS PURSE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
CREATING REFUGE$1,000
MOBILITY WORLDWIDE$850
NAVIGATORS$600
WORLD GOSPEL OUTREACH$600
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 14%COYOTE HILL CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $1k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 14%COYOTE HILL CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $1k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 14%COYOTE HILL CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $1k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 14%COYOTE HILL CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $1k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 14%COYOTE HILL CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $1k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $200 → 14%COYOTE HILL CHRISTIAN CHILDREN'S HOME: $1k → 17%CITY OF REFUGE: $300 → 17%CITY OF REFUGE: $156 → 17%LOVE COLUMBIA: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
CO
MO
KS
NC
DC
MS
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$320k · 30 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.

30 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
8

Total granted

$320k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
-2%

Still filing today

60%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionInternationalHuman ServicesFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Compassion International Incorporated
    6× · 2020–2025 · $20k · revenue +16%
  • FH
    FAMILY HOPE INTERNATIONAL
    6× · 2020–2025 · $9k · revenue +95%
  • BH
    BIG HORN MINISTRIES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $8k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • CF
    CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP
    one grant, 2022 · $500
  • VF
    VITAE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $500 · revenue -2%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

2
Servenow

Sharing Christ's Passion for the world by serving the most vulnerable through national churches and leaders.

Human Services
3
Challenge Ministries Us

The organization exists to spread the gospel of Jesus Christ while providing support and serving the poor through benevolent assistance, medical services, education, orphan care, church planting, etc.

International
4
World Orphans

World orphans vision is to empower the church to care for orphans and vulnerable families. we equip, inspire, and mobilize the church to care for orphans and vulnerable children. churches engaged. children restored. communities transformed…

5
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
6
Churches in Missions Inc

Mobilization of churches in America by taking pastors and laymen on vision and service trips overseas in fulfillment of Jesus command to go ye into all the world, making disciples...

Human Services
7
World Reach Inc

World reach is a global, evangelical missions organization serving fields in east africa, central and south america, europe and the u.s. our purpose is to fulfill the the great commission of jesus christ by reaching the world with the…

Religion
8
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
9
Pilgrim Africa

Pilgrim Africa's mission is to challenge despair, love boldly, and help African people create a future of sustainable prosperity and health. We give ourselves in service to others regardless of economic, religious, or social standing,…

International
10
Faith Aid

The organization cares for the sick and suffering in Jesus name by partnering with Christian mission hospitals, helping patients unable to afford treatment, and supporting Mustard Seed House ministry locations in Kenya.

International
11
Mission Mississippi

To encourage and demonstrate grace in the body of christ across racial lines, so that communities throughout mississippi can see practical evidence of the gospel message.

Civil Rights
12
Lifeway Mission International

Provide humanitarian aid and christian discipleship.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySenior Support ServicesFood Pantries & AssistanceLegal Aid & Immigration Ser…United Way FederationsChristian Youth CampsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Child and Family ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…Pregnancy Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 24. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%4%<5yr12%4%5–10yr16%32%10–20yr15%16%20–35yr16%16%35–55yr24%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr12%1%5–10yr16%13%10–20yr15%6%20–35yr16%55%35–55yr24%25%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/30
the rest of the field
12%
4,544/39,461

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
17/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE CROSSING CHURCH — $136,550 · OtherTHE CROSSING CHURCHCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC — $59,311 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC+18 more — $49,074 · Other+18 moreCompassion International Incorporated — $20,110 · InternationalCompassion I…FAMILY HOPE INTERNATIONAL — $8,925 · InternationalFAMILY HOPE …MOBILITY WORLDWIDE — $4,050 · InternationalMOBILITY WOR…PARTNERS FOR CARE INC — $2,250 · InternationalPARTNERS FOR…BIG HORN MINISTRIES — $7,650 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $5,236 · ReligionTHE SENDING PROJECT — $2,100 · ReligionKIDS ACROSS AMERICA — $1,414 · Religion+1 more — $100 · ReligionCoyote Hill Foster Care Ministries — $6,200 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $2,700 · Human ServicesLove Columbia Corp Love Columbia — $500 · Human ServicesCITY OF REFUGE — $456 · Human ServicesTHE FOOD BANK FOR CENTRAL & NORTHEAST MISSOURI — $7,510 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS OF COLUMBIA INC — $750 · Food & NutritionYOUNG LIFE — $6,500 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $500 · Youth DevelopmentLIFE NETWORK OF CENTRAL MISSOURI — $2,000 · HealthVOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER — $850 · PhilanthropyTIGERS ON THE PROWL INC — $500 · Philanthropy
Other$244,935International$35,335Religion$16,500Human Services$9,856Food & Nutrition$8,260Youth Development$7,000Health$2,000Philanthropy$1,350

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFAMILY HOPE INTERNATIONAL — $8,925 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetBIG HORN MINISTRIES — $7,650 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK FOR CENTRAL & NORTHEAST MISSOURI — $7,510 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $6,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCoyote Hill Foster Care Ministries — $6,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $5,236 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMOBILITY WORLDWIDE — $4,050 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $2,700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS FOR CARE INC — $2,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SENDING PROJECT — $2,100 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLIFE NETWORK OF CENTRAL MISSOURI — $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetKIDS ACROSS AMERICA — $1,414 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHEART OF MISSOURI UNITED WAY INC — $1,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER — $850 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF COLUMBIA INC — $750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $575 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVITAE FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIGERS ON THE PROWL INC — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY OF REFUGE — $456 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS 17 OLIVER BUEHRLE CHAPTER — $450 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT EMERGENCY SHELTER INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKanakuk Ministries — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated
  • Who funds FAMILY HOPE INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds BIG HORN MINISTRIES
  • Who funds THE FOOD BANK FOR CENTRAL & NORTHEAST MISSOURI
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds Coyote Hill Foster Care Ministries
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds MOBILITY WORLDWIDE
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds PARTNERS FOR CARE INC
  • Who funds THE SENDING PROJECT
  • Who funds LIFE NETWORK OF CENTRAL MISSOURI
  • Who funds KIDS ACROSS AMERICA
  • Who funds HEART OF MISSOURI UNITED WAY INC
  • Who funds VOLUNTARY ACTION CENTER
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF COLUMBIA INC
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC
  • Who funds VITAE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TIGERS ON THE PROWL INC
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
  • Who funds Love Columbia Corp Love Columbia
  • Who funds CITY OF REFUGE
  • Who funds DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS 17 OLIVER BUEHRLE CHAPTER
  • Who funds CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT EMERGENCY SHELTER INC
  • Who funds Kanakuk Ministries

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orscheln Industries Foundation IncMO26.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orscheln Industries Foundation Inc · Veterans United Foundation · Boone Electric Community Trust · Boone County Community Trust · Community Foundation of Central Mo · Fred V & Dorothy H Heinkel Charitable Foundation · Allen P and Josephine B Green · Alan Bentley Wright Charitable Fund · Knipp Family Foundation · Heart of Missouri United Way Inc · Stafford Family Charitable Trust · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Psalm 103 Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph