Skip to content

· Private foundation

Prospect Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$67kReligion$44kEducation$21kHuman Services$7kAnimals$5kCommunity Improvement$4kFood & Nutrition$2kRecreation & Sports$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$347k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$9,000
CYPRESS HILLS DEV CORP$3,000
ZEN STUDIES SOCIETY$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
COVENANT HOUSE$2,000
ROCHESTER FOOD PANTRY$2,000
SIENNA COLLEGE$1,500
BOSTON COLLEGE$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
SOCIETY OF THE SACRED HEART$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
PEOPLE IN NEED$1,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$1,000
HUNTER COLLEGE$500
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ROCHESTER FOOD PANTRY: $2k → 16%THE GRAIL: $1k → 9%ROCHESTER FOOD PANTRY: $2k → 16%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $2k → 17%PEOPLE IN NEED: $1k → 20%GOOD SHEPERD SERVICES: $2k → 17%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $2k → 17%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $1k → 17%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $1k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $2k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
NJ
DE
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$192k · 27 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
13

Total granted

$192k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+92%

Still filing today

48%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentHuman ServicesAnimalsEducationReligionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $41k · revenue +41%
  • SU
    SIENA UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +35%
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $8k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • FU
    FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF EVANSTON
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • PP
    PROSPECT PARK ALLIANCE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue +66%
  • AL
    AMERICAN LITTORAL SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +129%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.": - count it: our work is…

International
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
4
New Jersey Conservation Foundation

Recognizing that a healthy environment is critical to the well-being and survival of all living things, new jersey conservation foundation is devoted to preserving land and protecting natural resources throughout new jersey's (continued on…

Environment
5
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
6
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
7
Amazon Conservation Team

The amazon conservation team (act) partners with indigenous and other local communities to protect tropical forests and strengthen traditional culture.

Science & Tech
8
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
9
Akashinga Inc

Deliver ecological stability and long-term protection of large-scale wilderness by supporting and empowering local communities.

Animals
10
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
11
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
12
National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Park Foundation; the most unlike its peers is American Mazu Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
17/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $14,000 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHZEN STUDIES SOCIETY INC: $13,000 · OtherZEN STUDIES SOCIETY INCIndividual grant recipient: $9,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSOCIETY OF THE SACRED HEART: $7,250 · OtherSOCIETY OF THE SACRED HEARTIndividual grant recipient: $6,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCYPRESS HILLS DEV CORP: $6,500 · OtherCYPRESS HILLS DEV CORPIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF BROOKLYN: $4,000 · OtherFORDHAM LAW SCHOOL: $4,000 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF EVANSTON: $3,500 · Other+13 more: $16,700 · Other+13 moreNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $41,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC350ORG: $14,750 · Environment350ORGCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $6,500 · EnvironmentCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INCEARTHJUSTICE: $6,500 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICEWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $4,000 · Environment+2 more: $3,000 · EnvironmentSIENA UNIVERSITY: $8,500 · EducationTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $8,000 · EducationGOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $7,250 · Human ServicesROCHESTER FOOD PANTRY: $4,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE: $3,000 · Human ServicesTHE GRAIL: $1,100 · Human ServicesPEOPLE IN NEED INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE RAPTOR TRUST: $2,500 · AnimalsWILDLIFE CENTER OF VENICE INC: $500 · AnimalsSOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS WAKE COUNTY INC: $500 · AnimalsAMERICAN MAZU FOUNDATION: $2,900 · ReligionPROSPECT PARK ALLIANCE INC: $2,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$91,200Environment$75,750Education$16,500Human Services$16,350Animals$3,500Religion$2,900Recreation & Sports$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $41,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budget350ORG: $14,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSIENA UNIVERSITY: $8,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $8,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $7,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $6,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetROCHESTER FOOD PANTRY: $4,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN MAZU FOUNDATION: $2,900 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetTHE RAPTOR TRUST: $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPROSPECT PARK ALLIANCE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LITTORAL SOCIETY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GRAIL: $1,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLUE RIDGE PARKWAY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLIFE CENTER OF VENICE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS WAKE COUNTY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds 350ORG ↗
  • Who funds SIENA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCHESTER FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN MAZU FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE RAPTOR TRUST ↗
  • Who funds PROSPECT PARK ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LITTORAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE GRAIL ↗
  • Who funds BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE IN NEED INC ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE CENTER OF VENICE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS WAKE COUNTY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC8.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Prospect Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Prospect Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
  • American Littoral Society: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Prospect Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Prospect Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Prospect’s filings →

More from the funding graph