· Private foundation
Project Hope Northwest
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k27 grants · $82k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GLOBAL MISSIONS INTL | $50,318 |
| Individual grant recipient | $6,627 |
| Individual grant recipient | $6,584 |
| Individual grant recipient | $6,584 |
| Individual grant recipient | $6,584 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| CHI ALPHA CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP | $5,000 |
| LIFE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY | $5,000 |
| SAMARITANS PURSE | $4,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,000 |
| PAN-AFRICAN ACADDEMY SURGEONS | $3,500 |
| CARENET | $3,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,300 |
| CHRISTIAN MEDICAL DENTAL | $2,700 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,200 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.
22 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- GMGLOBAL MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL2× · 2023–2024 · $84k · revenue +19%
- YLYOUNG LIFE2× · 2020–2024 · $16k · revenue +62%
- SPSAMARITAN'S PURSE3× · 2021–2024 · $6k · revenue +83%
Funded once
- SMSkatechurch Ministryone grant, 2023 · $100k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $13k
- BCBaptist Church in Zahleone grant, 2020 · $11k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Christian evangelism
The mission is to train and equip leaders. To help all believers reach their full potential and divine destiny, that they may become all that God has called them to be.
Disciple Maker Ministries is devoted to fulfilling the Great Commission through evangelism and reproducing discipleship.
Religious
To reach out with the message of the gospel of jesus to the last, least, and the lost
Ministry
To equip disciples of Jesus Christ to balance and live their lives to glorify God in every area of life; spirituall, personally, communally and physically by
Religious- Sharing the Gospel and the love of Christ with others.
Ministries church
Train and strengthen christian leaders in mozamibque; help the widows and orphans; work with nationals in evangelism and church planting. we do this to fulfill the great commission (mt 28:18-20) and obey jesus' command to love our…
To spread the Gospel to the Middle East
How this is measured
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GLOBAL MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds LEGACY LEADERSHIP ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds Nesteam International ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP FOR PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds BREAD OF LIFE MISSION ↗
- Who funds Care Net ↗
- Who funds Care Net Pregnancy & Family Services of Puget Sound ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Project Hope Northwest funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Project Hope Northwest. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Project Hope Northwest’s filings →