How much did PROJECT DISCOVERY OF VIRGINIA INC grant in FY2023?

PROJECT DISCOVERY OF VIRGINIA INC reported 18 grants totaling $689,860 in its FY2023 IRS filing.

Where is PROJECT DISCOVERY OF VIRGINIA INC based?

PROJECT DISCOVERY OF VIRGINIA INC is based in VA.

PROJECT DISCOVERY OF VIRGINIA INC

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

PROJECT DISCOVERY OF VIRGINIA INC

To increase access to and prepare elementary through high school students for success in post-secondary education.

$690k

Granted FY2023

Grants

Communities

$71k

Largest

01What you fund

0164% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2023.

Human Services$1.6MCommunity Improvement$437kHousing & Shelter$219kEducation$36kOther$1.3M

02FY2023 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k2 grants · $12k
$10k–50k13 grants · $410k
$50k–250k3 grants · $182k

$37,657

Median grant

States reached

$241k

Total assets

Largest grants

TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY$71,190
PEOPLE INCORPORATE OF SWVA$57,778
EMERGE RESOURCE LLC$52,844
CLINCH VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION AGEN$49,779
SKYLINE CAP$46,287
SUPPORT TO ELIMINATE POVERTY$42,309
THE IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION$40,595
HAMPTON ROADS COMMUNITY ACTION GROU$40,053
QUIN RIVERS DBA THRIVE VIRGINIA$37,657
WILLIAMSBURG JAMES CITY COUNCIL COM$32,831
MONTICELLO AREA COMMUNITY ACTION AG$31,333
EASTERN SHORE AREA AGENCY ON AGING$21,255
THE STOP ORGANIZATION$19,821
CAPUP - RICHMOND$18,243
PITTSYLVANIA COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTIO$15,304

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 7%. 55% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$3.4M · 20 repeat orgs$173k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$3.4M

$108k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%

+13%

Still filing today

80%

20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TA
TOTAL ACTION AGAINST POVERTY
6× · 2018–2023 · $369k · revenue +47%
CR
CAPUP - RICHMOND
6× · 2018–2023 · $344k · revenue +25%
PI
PEOPLE INCORPORATE OF SWVA
6× · 2018–2023 · $311k · revenue +21%

Funded once

WH
WESLEY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP
one grant, 2020 · $30k
TM
THE MOORE LEGACY FOUNDATION
one grant, 2021 · $24k · 40% of their budget
E
EMERGE
one grant, 2022 · $22k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Virginia Community Action

Virginia community action partnership (vacap) is the statewide membership association for virginia's thirty-one non-profit and public community action agencies. vacaps mission is to build the capacity and competencies of virginias…

Human Services

Community Action Commission of

Administers grants and programs to improve the lives of those who fall below the poverty level.

—

Community Action Partnership of Central

Agency provides community assistance to low income families and individuals.

Human Services

Community Action Agency Inc

To aid low income families with early education, energy assistance, nutrition help and other services.

Human Services

Clinton County Community Action Program

The mission of the organization is to prevent and alleviate poverty conditions and their causes among urban rural residents of the organization's service area.

—

Community Action for Improvement Inc

To build sustainable communities with partners by providing services and resources utilizing the whole family approach with low-income households to help reduce the burdens of poverty.

—

Community Action Partnership of

Capp, working in partnership with the community, provides culturally competent supportive services and programs to providence county residents in need to promote their achievement of economic self-sufficiency.

Community Improvement

Community Action Partnership

Assist elderly and low-income persons.

—

Community Action Partnership

Operation of a multipurpose organization in western nd that combats poverty and promotes self-sufficiency among its target population, whether material, cultural or economic.

Human Services

West Virginia Community Action Partnersh

West virginia community action partnership is an alliance of community action agencies that supports and strengthens our members, advocates for low-income and families and promotes partnerships.

Community Improvement

Arcap Community Action Agency Inc

Arcap community action agency, inc. is committed to moving people from poverty to economic self-sufficiency through the provision of technical, informational, educational, and support services.

Community Improvement

Community Action Agency

Provide social services to low income families to provide them with a better quality of life.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mountain Community Action Program and the most unlike its peers is Ahc Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

17/19

Grantees still filing

14/19

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Human Services$1,574,819Other$1,261,555Community Improvement$436,808Housing & Shelter$219,376Education$36,300

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Virginia Community ActionVA29.1× affinity11 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Virginia Community Action · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation PROJECT DISCOVERY OF VIRGINIA INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: THE MOORE LEGACY FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

high risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 822038896 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on THE MOORE LEGACY FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 40% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Project Discovery of Virginia Inc?

Find your warmest path to Project Discovery of Virginia Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

PROJECT DISCOVERY OF VIRGINIA INC

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Project Discovery of Virginia Inc?

More from the funding graph

PROJECT DISCOVERY OF VIRGINIA INC

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Project Discovery of Virginia Inc?

More from the funding graph