Skip to content
Prog Holdings Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Prog Holdings Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$494k
Granted FY2025still arriving
72
Grants FY2025still arriving
19
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Youth Development$268kEducation$165kCivil Rights$70kHuman Services$69kCommunity Improvement$64kInternational$52kHealth$33kEmployment$29kOther$0
02FY2025 · 72 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k63 grants · $174k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $89k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $231k
$3,000
Median grant
19
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GENERAL ASSEMBLY SPACE INC$70,000
GRANITE EDUCATION FOUNDATION$55,975
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF UTAH$55,000
UTAH BLACK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$50,000
FEEDING CHILDREN EVERYWHERE$34,875
ROOTS CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL$19,046
USERVEUTAH$14,804
COMMON THREAD$10,000
SUCCESS IN EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,000
DEFY VENTURES INC$9,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH$8,521
UTAH COMMUNITY ACTION$8,000
WTC ED DBA WOMEN TECH COUNCIL$8,000
YWCA UTAH$5,800
SILICON SLOPES$5,525
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $71k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%LATINO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%Brazoria County Dream Center: $2k → 10%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF SAN: $10k → 16%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%OPERATION BBQ RELIEF: $100 → 8%FREE TO RUN INC: $400 → 9%Latin American Association Inc: $2k → 13%Women in Golf Foundation Inc: $11k → 14%HOPE STREET GROUP: $2k → 7%ONE SIMPLE WISH: $4k → 11%THAI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $275 → 14%Wounded Warrior Project: $1k → 14%United Drag Alliance: $2k → 8%WOMEN IN GOLF FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 14%American Indian Services: $10k → 8%UTAH FOSTER CARE: $100 → 8%The Bradley Center for Grieving Children and Families: $2k → 8%1999 COLLECTIVE: $5k → 8%Asian Association of Utah: $2k → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $2k → 8%Nettie Gregory Center Inc: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
MO
VA
MD
AZ
AR
TN
DC
HI
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$633k · 36 repeat orgs$744k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +9% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 41 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
98

Total granted

$633k
$530k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
0%

Still filing today

69%
66%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $215k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationInternationalHealthAnimalsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GE
    Granite Education Foundation
    3× · 2023–2025 · $94k · revenue +47%
  • JA
    Junior Achievement of Utah & Idaho
    2× · 2024–2025 · $35k · revenue +34%
  • RC
    ROOTS CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL
    3× · 2023–2025 · $32k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • LI
    LATINOS IN ACTION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
  • UO
    University of Utah Professional Education
    one grant, 2024 · $64k
  • W
    WEHERO
    one grant, 2023 · $32k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Equality Utah Foundation

To secure equal rights and protections for lgbtq utahns and their families.

Civil Rights
2
Utah Foundation

Utah foundation's mission is to produce objective, thorough and well- reasoned research and analysis that promotes the effective use of public resources, a thriving economy, a well-prepared workforce and a high quality of life for utahns.…

Public Benefit
3
Utah World Trade Center

World trade center utah accelerates growth for utah companies through our global networks, programs, and services.

Community Improvement
4
Girl Scouts of Utah

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character who make the world a better place.

Youth Development
5
The Community Foundation of Utah

We are utah's partner in philanthropy, pioneering innovation and collaboration to invest in our community today for a brighter tomorrow.

Philanthropy
6
Upwardly Global

Upwardly global removes employment barriers for immigrant, refugee, and asylee professionals while advancing the inclusion of their skills into the u.s. economy.

Employment
7
Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah

Heal utah's mission is to protect utah's environment and its people by promoting clean air, clean energy, and comprehensive solutions to radioactive and toxic waste.

Environment
8
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
9
People Helping People

People helping people (php) is dedicated to reducing the number of children living in poverty by teaching low-income women, primarily single moms, how to earn a living wage. each year, 1,000 prospective clients enroll in our employment…

Human Services
10
Girls On the Run Utah

Educate and prepare girls for a lifetime of self-respect and healthy living through the power of running.

Youth Development
11
Youthbuild Global Inc

With love and respect, we partner with opportunity youth to build the skillsets and mindsets that lead to lifelong learning, livelihood, and leadership. youthbuild strives to create a world where all young people are seen for their…

Employment
12
Utah Health & Human Rights Project

The organization's mission is to help survivors of torture living in utah to heal from their physical and psychological injuries and rebuild their lives.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Utah Inc; the most unlike its peers is Womens Executive Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

123 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 123 of the 178 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
18
Early backer (in before they grew)
122/123
Grantees still filing
53/123
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UTAH BLACK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $72,000 · OtherUTAH BLACK CHAMBER OF COMMERCEGENERAL ASSEMBLY SPACE INC: $70,000 · OtherGENERAL ASSEMBLY SPACE INCUniversity of Utah Professional Education: $63,700 · OtherUniversity of Utah Professional EducationWEHERO: $32,000 · OtherUtah Community Action: $28,000 · Other+103 more: $381,159 · Other+103 moreBig Brothers Big Sisters of Utah: $165,300 · EducationBig Brothers Big Sisters of UtahLATINOS IN ACTION INC: $100,000 · EducationLATINOS IN ACTION INCGranite Education Foundation: $93,839 · EducationGranite Education FoundationROOTS CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL: $31,896 · EducationROOTS CHARTER HIGH SCHOOLUTAH STEM FOUNDATION INC: $19,750 · Education+16 more: $47,636 · Education+16 moreUtah Pride Center Inc: $25,250 · Human ServicesWOMEN IN GOLF FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 · Human ServicesNettie Gregory Center Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesFamily Service Association of San Antonio Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Indian Services: $10,000 · Human Services1999 Collective: $5,000 · Human ServicesONE SIMPLE WISH INC: $4,000 · Human Services+17 more: $27,263 · Human ServicesJunior Achievement of Utah & Idaho: $35,000 · InternationalWomen of the World: $7,850 · InternationalInternational Visitors Utah Council: $2,000 · InternationalWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $2,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,798 · International+6 more: $3,410 · InternationalFeeding Children Everywhere Inc: $34,875 · Food & NutritionST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $6,035 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $3,000 · Food & Nutrition+3 more: $2,152 · Food & NutritionPHOENIX PRIDE INC: $25,000 · Civil RightsUtah Children: $10,000 · Civil RightsINCLUSIVE AGILE: $5,000 · Civil RightsKEN GARFF FOR GOOD: $22,600 · Youth DevelopmentHACEMOS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $5,500 · Youth DevelopmentFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - UTAH: $2,500 · Youth Development100 BLACK MEN OF PHOENIX: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentLATINITAS INC: $1,800 · Youth Development
Other$646,859Education$458,421Human Services$103,513International$52,058Food & Nutrition$46,062Civil Rights$40,000Youth Development$34,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of Utah: $165,300 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetLATINOS IN ACTION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetGranite Education Foundation: $93,839 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetJunior Achievement of Utah & Idaho: $35,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetROOTS CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL: $31,896 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetUtah Pride Center Inc: $25,250 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPHOENIX PRIDE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetKEN GARFF FOR GOOD: $22,600 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUTAH STEM FOUNDATION INC: $19,750 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetOPERATION GRATITUDE INC: $18,215 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFor Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST): $14,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN IN GOLF FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetDEFY VENTURES INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUtah Children: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNettie Gregory Center Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetFamily Service Association of San Antonio Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Indian Services: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUTAH MICROENTERPRISE LOAN FUND: $8,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAH: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWomen of the World: $7,850 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA UTAH: $7,511 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SALT LAKE: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUTAH'S PROMISE: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $6,035 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYoung Women's Christian Association of Utah: $5,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budget1999 Collective: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYEAR UP INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOnerefugee: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetANGEL FLIGHT WEST INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetClean Slate Utah: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetINCLUSIVE AGILE: $5,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetThe Center for Economic Opportunity and Belonging: $4,465 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $4,462 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetONE SIMPLE WISH INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT SUCCESS COALITION: $4,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMeals on Wheels Summit Utah & Wasatch: $3,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHRISTMAS BOX INTERNATIONAL: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - UTAH: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Visitors Utah Council: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBORN THIS WAY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBrazoria County Dream Center Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLATIN AMERICAN ASSOCIATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SOLUTION ACADEMY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…Larry H Miller and Ga…Sorenson Legacy Found…George S and Dolores …Pacificorp Foundation…McCarthey Family Foun…Dominion Energy Chari…Lawrence & Janet Dee …Marriner S Eccles Fou…David Kelby Johnson M…Ssir Cares IncThe Miner Foundation
The Community Foundation of UtahUT38.6× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Utah · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Pacificorp Foundation Aka Pacific Power Foundation Aka Rocky Mountain Power Foundati · McCarthey Family Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Marriner S Eccles Foundation · David Kelby Johnson Memorial Foundation · Ssir Cares Inc · The Miner Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Prog Holdings Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Prog Holdings Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
23report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Prog Holdings Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Prog Holdings Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 178 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Prog Holdings’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home