· Public charity
Prince George's Provider Council Inc
To adovcate, collaborate, and educate for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $339k
- $50k–250k17 grants · $2.2M
- $250k+3 grants · $1.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE ARC OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY INC | $1,075,449 |
| ARDMORE ENTERPRISES INC | $422,086 |
| SOUTHERN MARYLAND VOCATIONAL INDUSTRIES INC DBA EPIC | $330,418 |
| SECOND FAMILY ADULT HOMES INC | $230,090 |
| LIVING HOPE INCORPORATED | $218,683 |
| MEDSOURCE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC | $203,228 |
| COMPASS MARYLAND INC | $156,946 |
| EBED COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT INC | $156,199 |
| FAMILY SERVICE FOUNDATION INC | $154,890 |
| MARYLAND NEIGHBORLY NETWORKS INC | $151,389 |
| VOCA CORPORATION OF MARYLAND | $131,345 |
| CALMRA INC | $118,986 |
| NEW HORIZONS SUPPORTED SERVICES INC | $107,272 |
| UNITED COMMUNITY SUPPORTS OF MARYLAND INC | $92,399 |
| NATIONAL CENTER ON INSTITUTIONS AND ALTERNATIVES INC | $90,272 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $3.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
30 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $126k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TATHE ARC OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY INC3× · 2023–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +38%
- AEARDMORE ENTERPRISES INC3× · 2023–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +40%
- SMSOUTHERN MARYLAND VOCATIONAL INDUSTRIES INC3× · 2023–2025 · $968k · revenue +68%
Funded once
- HOHEART OF GOLD INCone grant, 2025 · $46k
- ACALLIED COMMUNITY CAREone grant, 2025 · $31k
- FCFIRST CHOICE CARE INCone grant, 2025 · $18k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide training and independent living skills to individuals with development disabilities so they may become as self-reliant as possible and lead more meaningful lives in the community.
Residential Services, Inc. provides living options and related supports to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities of all ages.
Our mission is to provide services of the highest quality for people with cognitive and developmental disabilities and related disorders including autism that optimize each individual's independence and capabilities, ensure…
Housing and programs for persons with intellectual disabilities.
Worcester county developmental center is committed to empoweringadults with developmental and physical disabilities to be productive,responsible, and participating members of the community byidentifying, enhancing, and creating…
Comprehensive 24 hour residential and day service supports for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
To empower individuals to lead fulfilling and productive lives at home and in the community.
Richmond residential services strives to provide person-centered care for individuals with diverse abilities and support needs, facilitating choice, growth and community participation
To establish places of residence for adults who are developmentally disabled so as to enable them to have available an environment which is condusive to their becoming and remaining productive members in society.
Lifeworks provides education, jobs and homes for persons with developmental disabilities empowering them to lead meaningful lives within the community. our guiding principles ensure that lifeworks staff and volunteers strive to create and…
To support people with intellectual and developmental disabilities to discover and live their best lives.
Provide services for individuals with developmental disabilities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Full Citizenship of Maryland Inc and the most unlike its peers is Frontline Community Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE ARC OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds ARDMORE ENTERPRISES INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN MARYLAND VOCATIONAL INDUSTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds LIVING HOPE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds MEDSOURCE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Ourcare Inc ↗
- Who funds EBED COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds COMPASS INC ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND NEIGHBORLY NETWORKS INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CALMRA INC ↗
- Who funds MELWOOD HORTICULTURAL TRAINING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NEW HORIZONS SUPPORTED SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CENTER ON INSTITUTIONS AND ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CHILDREN'S CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds V&T RESIDENTIAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CAROLINE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WEACHIEVE INC ↗
- Who funds FULL CITIZENSHIP OF MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND C0MMUNITY CONNECTION ↗
- Who funds LT JOSEPH P KENNEDY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE ROCK CREEK FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds FRONTLINE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CERENITY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Resource Connections Inc · Maryland Works Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · United Way of the National Capital Area · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Network for Good · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Prince George's Provider Council Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Melwood Horticultural Training Center Inc — 73% of income from government
- The Arc of Prince George's County Inc — 2% of income from government
- Weachieve Inc — 1% of income from government
- National Center On Institutions and Alternatives Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Prince George's Provider Council Inc?
Find your warmest path to Prince George's Provider Council Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.