Skip to content

· Private foundation

Prigmore Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$38k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$213kEnvironment$91kHealth$26kEducation$25kPhilanthropy$15kHuman Services$10kCrime & Legal$10kInternational$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$604k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF THE COMMODORE TRAIL$11,529
GAY MEN'S CHORUS OF SOUTH FLORIDA$5,000
WOMEN'S CLUB OF COCONUT GROVE$5,000
MIAMI CITY BALLET$5,000
EVERGLADES FOUNDATION$5,000
FRIENDS OF WLRN$2,400
MIAMI WATERKEEPER$1,432
WDNA$1,250
FAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN$1,010
Individual grant recipient$521
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $5k → 15%FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 15%KIDSIDE INC: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Prigmore Family Charitable Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 94% of the giving stays in FL; by stated purpose, 85%.

Prigmore Family Charitable Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.6% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$278k · 12 repeat orgs$125k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
14

Total granted

$278k
$97k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+5%

Still filing today

42%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $25k · revenue +102%
  • SA
    SHAKE A LEG MIAMI INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $25k · revenue +8%
  • TW
    THE WILLISTON NORTHAMPTON SCHOOL
    2× · 2021–2022 · $25k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • VM
    VIZCAYA MUSEUMS AND GARDENS
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • T
    TERRAWAT
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mote Marine Laboratory Inc

The advancement of marine and environmental sciences through scientific research, education and public outreach, leading new discoveries, revitalization and sustainability of our oceans and greater public understanding of our marine…

—
2
South Florida Symphony Orchestra Inc

The orchestra is dedicated to bringing orchestral music of the highest caliber to south florida. its mission is to delight, inspire and educate the communities we serve through music.

Arts & Culture
3
Blue World Foundation Inc

To stabilize the population of marine species in danger, especially sharks and rays in the caribbean of guatemala; through science and community strengthening which will provide the creation of alternative livelihoods, which eventually…

Environment
4
The Coral Reef and Marine Science Foundation Inc C/O James Bildner
—
5
Florida Repertory Company Inc

Florida rep is committed to providing a first-class regional theatre for southwest florida; to creating, nurturing and developing an ensemble of theatre professionals who will develop long term relationships working on a wide variety of…

Arts & Culture
6
Clean Miami Beach Inc

Clean miami beach is dedicated to keeping our community and natural habitats free of garbage and harmful pollutants with a focus on single-use plastics. the goal is to teach residents, and educate the youth of today, how everyone can…

Environment
7
Florida Chamber of Commerce Foundation Inc

Working in partnership with state business leaders to secure florida's future.

—
8
Florida Conservation Group Inc

Mission is to seek protection of land and water resources through restoration and conservation; and conducting education and outreach on the ecological and economic importance of natural lands. we protect land from development and protect…

Environment
9
University of Miami
—
10
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
11
Miami Music Project Inc

Miami music project uses music as an instrument for social transformation, empowering children to acquire values and achieve their full potential, positively affecting their society through the study and performance of music. our vision is…

Arts & Culture
12
Dance Now Ensemble Inc

Form 990, part 1, line 1 - organization mission and significant activities the mission of dance now miami is to promote the artistic vision of co- founders hannah baumgarten and diego salterini. the company creates, promotes and produces…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is South Florida Public Media Group Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Rehearsal Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VIZCAYA GARDENS: $60,000 · OtherVIZCAYA GARDENSADRIENNE ARSCHT CENTER: $50,000 · OtherADRIENNE ARSCHT CENTERFAIRCHILD GARDENS: $36,000 · OtherFAIRCHILD GARDENSVIZCAYA MUSEUMS AND GARDENS: $25,000 · OtherVIZCAYA MUSEUMS AND GARDENSTERRAWAT: $15,000 · OtherTERRAWATIndividual grant recipient: $12,500 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE CAROUSEL: $11,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · Other+11 more: $20,771 · Other+11 moreTHE WILLISTON NORTHAMPTON SCHOOL: $25,000 · EducationTHE WILLISTON…NEW WORLD SYMPHONY INC: $25,000 · EducationNEW WORLD SYM…THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · EnvironmentTHE EVERGL…FRIENDS OF THE COMMODORE TRAIL INC: $11,529 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF…BISCAYNE BAY WATERKEEPER INC: $1,432 · Environment+1 more: $1,010 · EnvironmentSHAKE A LEG MIAMI INC: $25,000 · HealthSOUTH FLORIDA PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP INC: $2,400 · HealthMIAMI CITY BALLET INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureGAY MEN'S CHORUS OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE WOMAN'S CLUB OF COCONUT GROVE: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE REHEARSAL CLUB: $1,200 · Arts & CultureKIDSIDE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $5,999 · Human ServicesCORAL GABLES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · PhilanthropyTERRAWATU INC: $10,000 · International
Other$240,271Education$50,000Environment$38,971Health$27,400Arts & Culture$21,200Human Services$15,999Philanthropy$15,000International$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSHAKE A LEG MIAMI INC: $25,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTHE WILLISTON NORTHAMPTON SCHOOL: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW WORLD SYMPHONY INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCORAL GABLES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE COMMODORE TRAIL INC: $11,529 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetKIDSIDE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetTERRAWATU INC: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetMIAMI CITY BALLET INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $5,999 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetGAY MEN'S CHORUS OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE WOMAN'S CLUB OF COCONUT GROVE: $5,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP INC: $2,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBISCAYNE BAY WATERKEEPER INC: $1,432 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE REHEARSAL CLUB: $1,200 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN INC: $1,010 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHAKE A LEG MIAMI INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WILLISTON NORTHAMPTON SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds NEW WORLD SYMPHONY INC ↗
  • Who funds CORAL GABLES COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE COMMODORE TRAIL INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDSIDE INC ↗
  • Who funds TERRAWATU INC ↗
  • Who funds MIAMI CITY BALLET INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GAY MEN'S CHORUS OF SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WOMAN'S CLUB OF COCONUT GROVE ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH FLORIDA PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds BISCAYNE BAY WATERKEEPER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE REHEARSAL CLUB ↗
  • Who funds FAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Miami Foundation IncFL16.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Miami Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Prigmore Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Prigmore Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Biscayne Bay Waterkeeper Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc: 4% of income from government
  • New World Symphony Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Prigmore Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph