· Private foundation
Price Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k13 grants · $31k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FAMILY PROMISE | $10,000 |
| IGLESIA LUTERANA CRISTO REY | $6,000 |
| FORGE EVOLUTION | $5,500 |
| HOMEWARD PIKES PEAK | $3,700 |
| GREENBERG CENTER | $3,000 |
| GRIFFITH CENTER | $3,000 |
| BEEF STICKS FOR BACKPACKS | $2,500 |
| MUJERES MOVIMINETO | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| CIVA HIGH SCHOOL | $1,000 |
| GOODWILL COLORADO | $600 |
| MS SOCIETY | $500 |
| NATION MS SOCIETY | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FHFOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION2× · 2022–2023 · $20k · revenue +62%
- FEForge Evolution3× · 2022–2024 · $16k · revenue +9%
- HCHillside Connection2× · 2022–2023 · $4k · revenue +76%
Funded once
- OWONE WORLD SURGERYone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -30%
- MFMAVE FOOD BANKone grant, 2023 · $20k
- TATrails and Open Space Coalitiongraduatedone grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue +37%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Center for Nonprofit Excellence strengthens Southern Colorado's nonprofit sector through leadership and resource development, advocacy and collaboration. Together, with our partners, we are co-creating a vibrant community in the Pikes…
Colorado Thrives exists to support Coloradans to achieve economic mobility through access to good jobs.
WCLI empowers women in Colorado Springs to realize their full leadership potential, breakdown barriers to advancement, create a more inclusive and equitable community for all.
The Pinon Project Family Resource Center strengthens our community by providing comprehensive services for children and families.
The Pikes Peak Justice and Peace Commission educates, advocates, and cultivates peace, justice, nonviolence, and sustainability in the Pikes Peak Region, engaging our world.
Peak partnership shall be operated exclusively for: (i) the promotion of social welfare by developing and advocating for legislation, regulations, and government programs to improve the environment, ...see continuation on schedule o
Promote the general interest of daily, weekly, and monthly newspapers and online publications, improve editorials and business methods of daily and weekly newspapers, and advance those newspapers' usefulness and influence in the public…
The mission of the Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation is to promote the health and well-being of physicians and physician assistants through evaluation, treatment referral, support education and research.
Elevating Connections is dedicated to building sustained positive relationships for current & former youth in foster care-including those experiencing sibling separation-to find their voice & build meaningful community connections.
Colorado Springs Convention and Visitors Bureau's, now doing business as Visit Colorado Springs (VCOS), primary exempt purpose is promotion of the Pikes Peak Region. VCOS is designed to stimulate the visitor industry in the Pikes Peak…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Goodwill of Colorado and the most unlike its peers is Ukraine Power Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ONE WORLD SURGERY ↗
- Who funds FOSTERING HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Mujeres Movimiento Inc ↗
- Who funds Forge Evolution ↗
- Who funds Trails and Open Space Coalition ↗
- Who funds Homeward Pikes Peak ↗
- Who funds Denver Park Trust ↗
- Who funds PIKES PEAK UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds Hillside Connection ↗
- Who funds Goodwill of Colorado ↗
- Who funds Children's Literacy Center Inc ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF COLORADO ↗
- Who funds FOOD TO POWER (FKA COLORADO SPRINGS FOOD RESCUE) ↗
- Who funds Citizens Project ↗
- Who funds Ukraine Power Inc ↗
- Who funds Women Partnering ↗
- Who funds Peak Education ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Joseph Henry Edmondson Foundation · Pikes Peak Community Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · The Myron Stratton Home · INDYGIVE DBA Give Pikes Peak · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Ent Credit Union · Colorado Springs Health Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Esther M & Freeman E Everett Charitable · The Hester E & Edwin W Giddings Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Price Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.