Skip to content

· Private foundation

Press Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$29kEnvironment$16kEducation$8kCivil Rights$7kHealth$7kArts & Culture$3kPublic Benefit$3kInternational$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
$700
Median grant
8
States reached
$115k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH COLORADO$11,000
FOCUS FOR DEMOCRACY$2,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION$2,000
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND$2,000
EARTH JUSTICE$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,500
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$1,500
KOHELET FOUNDATION$700
FAME CENTER$500
CHILDREN INC$300
HOPEWELL FUND$250
SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER$250
US HOLOCAUST MUSEUM$200
Individual grant recipient$200
TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND$25
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 90% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KOHELET FOUNDATION: $700 → 7%SIERRA CLUB: $600 → 10%EARTH JUSTICE: $2k → 10%WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS: $300 → 17%SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: $2k → 18%SAVE THE CHILDREN: $500 → 9%CONGREGATION EMANUEL: $6k → 12%FEED THE HUNGRY: $1k → 13%FAME CENTER: $500 → 14%CHILDREN INC: $820 → 7%SIERRA CLUB: $550 → 10%EARTH JUSTICE: $1k → 10%SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: $2k → 18%CONGREGATION EMANUEL: $626 → 12%NORTH PARK ELEMENTARY: $8k → 14%CHILDREN INC: $400 → 7%SIERRA CLUB: $350 → 10%EARTH JUSTICE: $1k → 10%SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: $1k → 18%NORTH PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $7k → 14%EARTH JUSTICE: $400 → 10%SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: $450 → 18%JEWISH COLORADO: $11k → 12%NORTH PARK ELEMENTARY: $5k → 14%SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER: $350 → 18%JEWISH COLORADO: $7k → 12%KOHELET: $645 → 12%KOHELET: $570 → 12%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $500 → 17%KOHELET: $525 → 12%PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION: $2k → 17%KOHELET: $420 → 12%PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION: $2k → 17%FOCUS FOR DEMOCRACY: $3k → 14%KOHELET: $320 → 12%PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION: $1k → 17%AMERICANS UNITED: $2k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION: $550 → 17%GREEN PEACE: $600 → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION: $550 → 17%AMERICANS UNITED: $400 → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION: $500 → 17%ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND: $2k → 17%LEAGUE WOMEN VOTERS: $800 → 12%ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND: $2k → 17%ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND: $2k → 17%ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND: $700 → 17%DENVER ART MUSEUM: $375 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
SD
IN
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$60k · 27 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
17

Total granted

$60k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+22%

Still filing today

52%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentInternationalCivil RightsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED
    6× · 2019–2024 · $7k · revenue +139%
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $7k · revenue +12%
  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $6k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • NP
    NORTH PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue +5%
  • LG
    LESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue -12%
  • LW
    LEAGUE WOMEN VOTERS
    one grant, 2023 · $800
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
2
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
3
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
4
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
5
Federation for American Immigration Reform

The federation for american immigration reform's (fair) mission is to educate the public about the economic, sociological, environmental, demographic and other effects of mass immigration to the united states.

International
6
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
7
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
8
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
9
Free Press

Free press was created to give people a voice in the crucial decisions that shape our media. we believe that positive social change, racial justice and meaningful engagement in public life require equitable access to technology, diverse…

Arts & Culture
10
Property and Environment Research Center

Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.

Public Benefit
11
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
12
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Park Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Kohelet Foundation (Dba Tzemach David Foundation). Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
19/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $13,059 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONGREGATION EMANUEL: $6,311 · OtherCONGREGATION EMANUELKOHELET: $2,480 · OtherKOHELETIndividual grant recipient: $2,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSIERRA CLUB: $1,950 · OtherWORLD JEWISH CONGRESS: $1,305 · OtherFOCUS FOR DEMOCRACY FUND: $2,500 · OtherFOCUS FOR DEMOCRACY FUNDCHILDREN INCORPORATED: $1,520 · Other+25 more: $7,435 · Other+25 moreJEWISHColorado: $17,500 · PhilanthropyJEWISHColoradoLESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyTHE KOHELET FOUNDATION (DBA TZEMACH DAVID FOUNDATION): $700 · Philanthropy+1 more: $250 · PhilanthropyENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $7,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL …EARTHJUSTICE: $4,900 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICE+1 more: $25 · EnvironmentNORTH PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $7,194 · EducationNORTH PAR…UNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $520 · EducationUNIVERSIT…+1 more: $50 · EducationPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $6,950 · HealthSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $5,800 · Crime & LegalThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $975 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $854 · Arts & CultureDENVER ART MUSEUM: $675 · Arts & CultureFAME CENTER: $500 · Arts & CultureROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $300 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $50 · Arts & Culture
Other$38,810Philanthropy$19,450Environment$11,925Education$7,764Health$6,950Crime & Legal$5,800Arts & Culture$3,354

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISHColorado: $17,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ASSOCIATION: $7,194 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $6,950 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $5,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $4,900 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFOCUS FOR DEMOCRACY FUND: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $1,950 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN INCORPORATED: $1,520 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $975 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $854 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KOHELET FOUNDATION (DBA TZEMACH DAVID FOUNDATION): $700 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGREENPEACE INC: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER ART MUSEUM: $675 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $520 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAME CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREEN AMERICA: $410 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC CITIZEN INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOPEWELL FUND: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOPULATION CONNECTION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HARRY S TRUMAN LIBRARY INSTITUTE NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISHColorado ↗
  • Who funds NORTH PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds FOCUS FOR DEMOCRACY FUND ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds LESEA GLOBAL FEED THE HUNGRY INC ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE KOHELET FOUNDATION (DBA TZEMACH DAVID FOUNDATION) ↗
  • Who funds GREENPEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds DENVER ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds FAME CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GREEN AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC CITIZEN INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPEWELL FUND ↗
  • Who funds POPULATION CONNECTION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Press Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Press Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Press Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Press Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Press Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph