Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Presence Care Transformation Corporation

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable.

$97k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$97k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$4.0MCrime & Legal$200kCommunity Improvement$103kInternational$50kHuman Services$43kHousing & Shelter$25kReligion$25kArts & Culture$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$97,260
Median grant
1
States reached
$246M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ADVOCATIA SOLUTIONS INC$97,260
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%INSTITUTE FOR LATINO PROGRESS: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
2
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
3
American Hospital Association

To advance the health of all individuals and communities. The AHA leads, represents and serves hospitals, health systems and other related organizations that are accountable to the community and committed to equitable care and health…

—
4
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
5
Illinois Health and Hospital Association

To advocate for and support hospitals and health systems as they serve patients and communities in illinois.

—
6
Mchc Chicago Hospital Council

The mission of mchc chicago hospital council is to foster, promote, support, develop and encourage charitable, educational, scholastic and scientific purposes; promote cooperative effort and action between hospitals and other health care…

Health
7
Alexian Brothers Medical Group Specialty Care

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

Health
8
Chicago Cares Inc

Chicago Cares, Inc. mobilizes volunteers to build a stronger, more unified Chicago.

Community Improvement
9
Ascension Health Global Mission

Rooted in the loving ministry of Jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. Our Catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually centered, holistic care,…

—
10
Mercy Hospital and Medical Center

We, mercy health system of chicago and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.mhmc is a member of mercy health system of chicago and trinity…

Health
11
Hispano Care Inc

Hispanocare's mission is to provide affordable, quality, bilingual, bicultural healthcare to chicago's latino community. an important part of our mission is to actively participate in community outreach. these outreach activities provide…

—
12
Alexian Brothers Specialty Group

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Medical Mission Board Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bosh Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ALEXIAN BROTHERS HEALTH SYSTEM — $3,886,541 · HealthALEXIAN BROTHERS HEALTH SYSTEM+4 more — $54,500 · HealthADVOCATIA SOLUTIONS INC — $200,080 · OtherAN ASSOCIATION OF FRANCISCAN SISTERS OF THE SACRED HEART — $25,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF JOLIET — $20,000 · OtherCatholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago — $17,500 · Other+3 more — $15,000 · OtherWORLD BUSINESS CHICAGO — $92,500 · Community ImprovementMETROPOLITAN PLANNING COUNCIL — $5,000 · Community ImprovementCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC — $50,000 · InternationalMERCY HOUSING INC — $25,000 · Housing & ShelterINSTITUTE FOR LATINO PROGRESS — $5,000 · Human ServicesBOSH Inc — $5,000 · EducationTHE DUSABLE BLACK HISTORY MUSEUM AND EDUCATION CENTER — $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Health$3,941,041Other$277,580Community Improvement$97,500International$50,000Housing & Shelter$25,000Human Services$5,000Education$5,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetALEXIAN BROTHERS HEALTH SYSTEM — $3,886,541 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWORLD BUSINESS CHICAGO — $92,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY HOUSING INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $22,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF JOLIET — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCatholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago — $17,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOLIDARITY BRIDGE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetIllinois Public Health Institute — $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMETROPOLITAN PLANNING COUNCIL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNAMI Chicago — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR LATINO PROGRESS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ALLIANCE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOSH Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetTHE DUSABLE BLACK HISTORY MUSEUM AND EDUCATION CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John D and Catherine …The Chicago Community…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Lloyd a Fry FoundationAbbVie FoundationThe Bank of America C…The Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…American Online Givin…
John D and Catherine T Macarthur FoundationIL16.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Presence Care Transformation Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Presence Care Transformation Corporation?

    Find your warmest path to Presence Care Transformation Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines