· Private foundation
Pramodchandra and Devila Shah Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 44% of PRAMODCHANDRA AND DEVILA SHAH FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BIDADA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| IMANE | $4,300 |
| INDIAN COMMUNITY OF NORTH SHORE | $2,500 |
| INDIAN CIRCLE FOR CARING USA INC | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,500 |
| AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| SAHELI | $1,000 |
| TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| WE CARE CHARITY | $1,000 |
| WOMEN WHO WIN | $1,000 |
| CUTANEOUS LYMPHOMA FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| FESSER AND FRIENDS INC | $500 |
| SATSANG CENTER | $500 |
| SOUTH FLORIDA HINDU TEMPLE | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
18 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BIBIDADA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $41k · revenue +83%
- WCWe Care Charity Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +236%
- SISAHELI INC8× · 2018–2025 · $7k · revenue +602%
Funded once
- WRWINDHAM REGION CHAMBER OF COMMERCEone grant, 2023 · $3k
- NSNORTH SHORE CRICKET CLUB INCone grant, 2023 · $1k
- VHVILLAGE HEALTH WORKSone grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +10%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
SHRI fights alongside communities to end open defecation as a key step in an ongoing struggle for health equity and soical and economic justice.
Eradicate cureable blindness, girls education, and women empowerment in the rural india
The purpose and mission of the sajjadiyya foundation limited is to enhance the availability of quality education, health care and social services to those in need so that they have a stable base upon which to build healthy and productive…
The mission of the share and care foundation is to create opportunities for deserving, economically challenged women and children of india by partnering with communities, philanthropists and local charitable organizations. such…
The organization's objective is to serve humanity in distress, aid local communities,and promote volunteerism in pursuit of its vision of a world of equality where everyone is happy,enjoying good health, and living in harmony with nature.
Intelehealth leverages open-source technology for Governments, NGOs and Hospitals to seamlessly connect 'hard to reach' populations with high quality primary healthcare. Health organizations all over the world have used our technology to…
To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.
Karuna-shechen initiates and oversees projects that provide health care, education, and social services for the under-served populations of india, nepal, and tibet.
To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.
To eliminate poverty through the creation of sustainable and effective community development projects, and to create holistic transformation by bringing hope, empowerment, and healing to those with the greatest need.
Shiv Nadar Foundation provides access to higher education tounderprivileged students and funds to other charitable organizations to supporteducation, research, social policies for women empowerment, affordable healthcareservices, medical…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Indian Circle for Caring Usa Inc (Icc) and the most unlike its peers is Adopt a Boxer Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BIDADA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds We Care Charity Inc ↗
- Who funds CUTANEOUS LYMPHOMA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAHELI INC ↗
- Who funds INDIAN CIRCLE FOR CARING USA INC (ICC) ↗
- Who funds AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA) ↗
- Who funds WOMEN WHO WIN INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTH SHORE CRICKET CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds VILLAGE HEALTH WORKS ↗
- Who funds Fesser and Friends Inc ↗
- Who funds Adopt A Boxer Rescue ↗
- Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Pramodchandra and Devila Shah Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Saheli Inc — 61% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.