Skip to content

· Private foundation

Praise Ministry Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$104kYouth Development$93kReligion$45kRecreation & Sports$7kInternational$6kHuman Services$2kCommunity Improvement$1k
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $22k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$392k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GROWING LEADERS INITIATIVE$22,000
BRIDGEBUILDERS$4,000
PETRA FIELD CAMPS$2,000
INDIA PRACTICAL MISSIONS$2,000
LISA BAIN MINISTRIES$2,000
ANANIAS HOUSE$1,000
AUGUSTINE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$1,000
SISTER INDIA$1,000
GRACE ACADEMY$1,000
HORIZON INTL$1,000
UNITED CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$1,000
TRINITY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$1,000
CHARLOTTE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$1,000
GRACE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$1,000
OKLAHOMA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
IN
CO
AZ
AR
TN
NC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$229k · 25 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
13

Total granted

$229k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+56%

Still filing today

36%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalReligionHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    ANANIAS HOUSE
    4× · 2020–2023 · $19k · revenue +318%
  • PF
    PETRA FIELD CAMPS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +11%
  • MO
    MUSEUM OF THE BIBLE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • FP
    FIRST PRESBY CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • CM
    CHAMPS MALE MENTORING PROGRAM - CHIRISEgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +178%
  • NH
    NEW HOPE
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Covenant Christian School

Covenant Christian School (CCS) is committed to the academic, spiritual, physical, and social growth of our children in a Christ-centered environment. Continued on Schedule O Covenant Christian School cultivates a distinctive generation…

Education
2
Dallas Christian School

Dallas Christian is a college preparatory school committed to Biblical values where students are prepared for Christ-centered lives of purpose, service and leadership.

Education
3
Oconee Christian Academy

Oconee Christian Academy exists to glorify God by nurturing students and equipping them to fulfill God's unique purpose for their lives.

Education
4
Summit Classical Christian School

Summit Classical Christian School is a PreK-12 school that exists to cultivate generations of joyful disciples of Christ by partnering with faithful Christian families to educate their children from a Biblical worldview using classical…

Education
5
Arborbrook Christian Academy

Arborbrook Christian Academy partners with parents to equip, empower, and encourage students to cultivate godly character, pursue life-long learning, and love the Lord Jesus Christ.

Education
6
Turlock Christian Schools Inc

Tcs is an independent christian school that prepares young men and women for college and life by providing challenging opportunities to excel in the vital areas of faith, virtue and knowledge.

—
7
Colleyville Covenant Christian

The mission is to provide a biblically based classical college preparatory education that inspires a passion for excellence a heart of grace and the character of Christ.

Education
8
Truth Academy Inc

Truth academy works in partnership with families to integrate high-quality education with biblical truth and discipleship in order to train students, spiritually and academically, how to operate in their god-given purpose and live out a…

Religion
9
Crowleys Ridge Academy

Christian education

—
10
Trinity Christian School Inc

To partner with parents to provide christ-centered, biblically based, classical education that nurtures the whole child.

Education
11
Seattle Classical Christian School

Sccs builds the city of god by forming servant leaders who love goodness, truth, and beauty.

Education
12
The Woodlands Christian Academy

TWCA is an independent, Christ-centered college preparatory school that integrates learning with biblical faith and challenges our students to reach their highest potential - intellectually, creatively, physically, and socially - for the…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trinity Christian Academy; the most unlike its peers is Museum of the Bible. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/22
Grantees still filing
10/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Growing Leaders Inc: $58,500 · OtherGrowing Leaders IncThe Growing Leaders Initiative Inc: $32,000 · OtherThe Growing Leaders Initiative IncORU MISSIONS: $19,000 · OtherORU MISSIONSBRIDGEBUILDERS: $16,000 · OtherBRIDGEBUILDERSPETRA FIELD CAMPS INC: $7,000 · Other+28 more: $66,700 · Other+28 moreANANIAS HOUSE: $19,000 · InternationalANANIAS H…SISTER INDIA LTD: $3,000 · InternationalSISTER IN…Entrusting Truth Inc: $13,500 · ReligionLISA BAIN MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 · ReligionROCKY MOUNTAIN CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $5,000 · EducationJESUS CHAPEL SCHOOL INC: $3,000 · EducationCHAMPS MALE MENTORING PROGRAM - CHIRISE: $2,000 · EducationDONELSON CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $1,000 · EducationTRINITY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $1,000 · EducationCascade Christian Schools: $1,000 · EducationCamp Verde United Christian School: $1,000 · EducationIN HIS IMAGE INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 · EducationHorizons International: $2,000 · Human ServicesCROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesCROSSOVER PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC: $2,500 · Community Improvement
Other$199,200International$22,000Religion$15,500Education$15,000Human Services$3,000Community Improvement$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGrowing Leaders Inc: $58,500 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetANANIAS HOUSE: $19,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPETRA FIELD CAMPS INC: $7,000 over 6y, 4.6% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE BIBLE: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJESUS CHAPEL SCHOOL INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSISTER INDIA LTD: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetIndia Practical Missions: $2,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetLISA BAIN MINISTRIES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHAMPS MALE MENTORING PROGRAM - CHIRISE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHorizons International: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLOTTE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDONELSON CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIN HIS IMAGE INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Growing Leaders Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Growing Leaders Initiative Inc ↗
  • Who funds ANANIAS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Entrusting Truth Inc ↗
  • Who funds PETRA FIELD CAMPS INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF THE BIBLE ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds JESUS CHAPEL SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds SISTER INDIA LTD ↗
  • Who funds CROSSOVER PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds India Practical Missions ↗
  • Who funds LISA BAIN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAMPS MALE MENTORING PROGRAM - CHIRISE ↗
  • Who funds Horizons International ↗
  • Who funds CHARLOTTE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds DONELSON CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Cascade Christian Schools ↗
  • Who funds CROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK15.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Praise Ministry Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Praise Ministry Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    8get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Praise Ministry Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Praise Ministry Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Praise Ministry’s filings →

    More from the funding graph