Skip to content

· Private foundation

Praise for Today Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$225k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$150k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

67% of Praise for Today Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to World Vision Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 7 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
’17
7
’18
6
’19
7
’20
7
’21
2
’22
7
’23
7
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$1.2MHuman Services$180kHousing & Shelter$90kReligion$87kCrime & Legal$28kYouth Development$15kRecreation & Sports$8kEducation$3k
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WORLD VISION$150,000
UNION GOSPEL MISSION$10,000
ENCOMPASS$10,000
BREAD OF LIFE MISSION$10,000
SNOQUALMIE VALLEY ALLIANCE CHURCH$10,000
SAMBICA$10,000
ISSAQUAH COMMUNITY SERVICES$10,000
SALVATION ARMY$5,000
BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL$5,000
HOPELINK$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HOPELINK: $10k → 9%HOPELINK: $10k → 9%HOPELINK: $5k → 9%HOPELINK: $5k → 9%HOPELINK: $5k → 9%HOPELINK: $5k → 9%HOPELINK: $5k → 9%BREAD OF LIFE MISSION: $10k → 9%YMCA OF GREATER SEATTLE: $10k → 9%BREAD OF LIFE MISSION: $5k → 9%BREAD OF LIFE MISSION: $5k → 9%BREAD OF LIFE MISSION: $5k → 9%BREAD OF LIFE MISSION: $5k → 9%BREAD OF LIFE MISSION: $5k → 9%BREAD OF LIFE MISSION: $5k → 9%BREAD OF LIFE MISSION: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$390k · 11 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against +49% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

$390k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+49%

Still filing today

73%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalReligionRecreation & SportsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EN
    ENCOMPASS NORTHWEST
    7× · 2017–2024 · $70k · revenue +151%
  • H
    HOPELINK
    7× · 2017–2024 · $45k · revenue +74%
  • BO
    BREAD OF LIFE MISSION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $45k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • TY
    THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871)graduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +49%
  • SV
    SUN VALLEY (WOOD RIVER COMMUNITY) YMCA
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • RF
    RAFIKI FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nexus Youth and Families

Restoring hope, building futures, and strengthening our communities through programs with youth, young adults and families. we support the behavioral health of at-risk and in-crisis youth across the greater south king county area. we take…

Human Services
2
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
3
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
4
Seattle Classical Christian School

Sccs builds the city of god by forming servant leaders who love goodness, truth, and beauty.

Education
5
University Cooperative School

We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.

—
6
Young Men's Christian Association of Honolulu

Strengthening communities is the y's cause through programs and services focused on youth development, healthy living and social responsibility.

Human Services
7
Blue Letter Bible

The specific purpose of this corporation is to present a biblical, christian ministry of the gospel, hope, encouragement and strength to as many people as possible. the intent of those who will conduct this corporation's work is to present…

—
8
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
9
Bibleproject

Bibleproject's mission is to help people experience the bible as a unified story that leads to jesus. this is achieved by creating biblical videos to be regularly released on a newly-created youtube channel. (continued on schedule o.)each…

Religion
10
Global Scholars

Global scholars exists so that christian academics are adequately equipped to have a redemptive influence among their students, colleagues, universities and disciplines, at a reasonable cost.

—
11
Young Womens Christian Association

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism and empowering women.

Human Services
12
Summit Ministries Inc

Summit ministries is an educational christian ministry with the purpose of equipping tomorrow's servant leaders to analyze competing worldviews and champion the christian faith, inspiring each one to love god with all his heart, soul,…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Vision Inc; the most unlike its peers is Issaquah Community Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WORLD VISION INC: $1,196,000 · InternationalWORLD VISION INC+2 more: $5,500 · InternationalENCOMPASS NORTHWEST: $70,000 · OtherENCOMPASS NORTHWES…SNOQUALMIE VALLEY ALLIANCE CHURCH: $65,000 · OtherSNOQUALMIE VALLEY …ISSAQUAH COMMUNITY SERVICES: $45,000 · OtherISSAQUAH COMMUNITY…UNION GOSPEL MISSION: $40,000 · OtherUNION GOSPEL MISSI…MATTHEW HOUSE: $28,000 · OtherMATTHEW HOUSESUN VALLEY (WOOD RIVER COMMUNITY) YMCA: $10,000 · Other+1 more: $5,000 · OtherHOPELINK: $45,000 · Human ServicesBREAD OF LIFE MISSION: $45,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871): $10,000 · Human ServicesSammamish Bible Camp Association Inc: $23,000 · Recreation & SportsBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $21,500 · ReligionTHE BEAR CREEK SCHOOL: $3,000 · Education
International$1,201,500Other$263,000Human Services$100,000Recreation & Sports$23,000Religion$21,500Education$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWORLD VISION INC: $1,196,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetENCOMPASS NORTHWEST: $70,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetHOPELINK: $45,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetISSAQUAH COMMUNITY SERVICES: $45,000 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetBREAD OF LIFE MISSION: $45,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetSammamish Bible Camp Association Inc: $23,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $21,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871): $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BEAR CREEK SCHOOL: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRAFIKI FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds ENCOMPASS NORTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds HOPELINK ↗
  • Who funds ISSAQUAH COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds BREAD OF LIFE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Sammamish Bible Camp Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds BIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SEATTLE (6871) ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL TEAMS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds THE BEAR CREEK SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds RAFIKI FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA15× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Praise for Today Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Praise for Today Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Medical Teams International: 14% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Praise for Today’s filings →

More from the funding graph