Skip to content

· Private foundation

Prairie Christian Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$98k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$117kPhilanthropy$99kReligion$75kInternational$40kHealth$23kFood & Nutrition$18kHousing & Shelter$17kEducation$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k26 grants · $63k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $35k
$2,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$352k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIFESONG$35,000
HOUSE OF JOY$9,500
ROANOKE AC CHURCH$7,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
HOSPITAL LUMINERE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
GLOBAL MINISTRY$5,000
ROANOKE AC HOME$3,500
TEAM 224$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,600
Individual grant recipient$2,500
ST JUDE$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
MIDWEST FOOD BANK$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $114k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COPE FOUNDATION: $500 → 6%TEAM 224: $3k → 12%TEAM 224: $3k → 7%TEAM 224: $1k → 7%LIFESONG: $35k → 11%LIFESONG: $35k → 11%STREATOR UNLIMITED: $1k → 15%STREATOR UNLIMITED: $1k → 15%LIFESONG: $15k → 11%STREATOR UNLIMITED: $1k → 15%STREATOR UNLIMITED: $1k → 15%STREATOR UNLIMITED: $500 → 15%STREATOR UNLIMITED: $500 → 15%STREATOR UNLIMITED: $375 → 15%MIDWEST FOOD BANK: $6k → 14%MIDWEST FOOD BANK: $3k → 14%MIDWEST FOOD BANK: $2k → 14%MIDWEST FOOD BANK: $2k → 14%MIDWEST FOOD BANK: $2k → 14%MIDWEST FOOD BANK: $1k → 14%MIDWEST FOOD BANK: $1k → 14%MIDWEST FOOD BANK: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
OR
IN
CO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$297k · 29 repeat orgs$140k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +110% since the first grant, against +71% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
56

Total granted

$297k
$112k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+110%
+71%

Still filing today

21%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionInternationalHealthEducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LI
    LIFESONG INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $85k · revenue +3%
  • MF
    MIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP
    8× · 2017–2025 · $16k · revenue +249%
  • T2
    TEAM 224 INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • LF
    LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +100%
  • HM
    HAITIAN MISSIONS
    one grant, 2017 · $13k
  • TL
    TRAIL LIFE 356
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Illinois Foodbank Inc

The Foodbank's mission is to provide food, and develop awareness of and creative solutions for food insecurity. Annually, the Foodbank distributes approximately 9.5 million pounds of food to 130 food pantries, soup kitchens, children's…

Food & Nutrition
2
Feeding Illinois

Feeding illinois is a coalition of eight feeding america food banks that provide food to over 2,400 food pantries, soup kitchens, and shelters that feed nearly 1.4 million residents across the entire state of illinois.

Food & Nutrition
3
Food Bank of Iowa

The organization receives, warehouses, and distributes salvageable food items to non-profit tax exempt member agencies to feed the ill, needy, and infants.

Food & Nutrition
4
Nourishing Hope

Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.

—
5
Cornerstone of Hope Inc

Cornerstone of hope, inc. exists to improve the quality of life for working-class families, veterans, and senior citizens in the low to middle-income bracket who wish to improve their lives and the lives of their children through better…

Housing & Shelter
6
Chicago Bible Society

The Chicago Bible Society is a ministry that distributes Bibles to prisons, hospitals, and shelters and promotes increased reading of the Bible.

Crime & Legal
7
River Bend Food Reservoir

To lead the community wide effort to end hunger in eastern iowa and western illinois. we will do this by leveraging partnerships to help people in need to stabilize their lives, engaging the public on hunger issues, advocating on behalf of…

Food & Nutrition
8
First Fruit Ministries

First fruit ministries shares the unconditional love of god through outreach and supportive housing for people experiencing homelessness or trafficking in southeastern north carolina.

Religion
9
Lampstand Ministries Inc

Presenting christ to chicago's poor through serving meals to the homeless and hungry and through religious worship services.

Religion
10
His Harvest Stand

To lift people out of poverty by responding to human need with the love of christ.

Food & Nutrition
11
Morning Star Mission Ministries Inc

Morning star mission ministries is a non-denominational organization dedicated to relieving the spiritual and physical hunger of the poor. we do this by providing food for the hungry, clothing for the needy, shelter for the homeless and…

Human Services
12
Street Samaritans

Street samaritans is an illinois not for profit corporation incorporated in 2017. the purpose of the organization is to provide chicagoland's homeless population with fulfillment of their most pressing needs including food, water and…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifesong Inc; the most unlike its peers is Stoller Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 95 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROANOKE AC CHURCH: $45,500 · OtherROANOKE AC CHURCHROANOKE AC HOME: $17,000 · OtherROANOKE AC HOMEHARVEST CALL: $16,730 · OtherHARVEST CALLHOSPITAL LUMINERE: $15,000 · OtherHAITIAN MISSIONS: $13,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $12,200 · OtherROANOKE AC NURSING HOME: $10,000 · Other+77 more: $157,450 · Other+77 moreLIFESONG INC: $85,000 · Human ServicesLIFESONG INCMIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP: $16,250 · Human ServicesMIDWEST FOOD BANK NFPTEAM 224 INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesTEAM 224 INCSTREATOR UNLIMITED INC: $5,375 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC: $25,000 · InternationalSOUTH SIDE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $6,000 · EducationDREAM CENTER OF PEORIA NFP: $1,250 · ReligionBEREAN PRISON MINISTRY INC: $1,000 · ReligionThe Colorado Trail Foundation: $1,000 · Recreation & SportsSTOLLER FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$287,080Human Services$114,125International$25,000Education$6,000Religion$2,250Recreation & Sports$1,000Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIFESONG INC: $85,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP: $16,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM 224 INC: $7,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetSOUTH SIDE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $6,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSTREATOR UNLIMITED INC: $5,375 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDREAM CENTER OF PEORIA NFP: $1,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Colorado Trail Foundation: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTOLLER FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROANOKE BENSON HOPE CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetASHES TO GLORY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOPE FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIFESONG INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDWEST FOOD BANK NFP ↗
  • Who funds TEAM 224 INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH SIDE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds STREATOR UNLIMITED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Share FoundationIL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Share Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Prairie Christian Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Prairie Christian Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 95 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Prairie Christian’s filings →

    More from the funding graph