Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ppa Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$487k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$645kReligion$318kEducation$44kInternational$35kHuman Services$23kHealth$18kCrime & Legal$18kHousing & Shelter$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $154k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $310k
$17,575
Median grant
4
States reached
$7.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BAYLOR UNIVERSITY - GIVE LIGHT CAMP$200,000
ARBOR ROAD CHURCH$60,000
NORTHWEST BIBLE CHURCH$50,000
CHRIST COMMUNITY CHURCH$33,000
ONE VOICE BOARD$30,000
SHORELINE CHURCH$25,000
CAMPUS OUTREACH$23,500
ISAIAH 117$17,575
THE VILLAGE CHURCH DENTON$15,000
MISSIONARY ATHLETES INTERNATIONAL$10,129
DENTON FREEDOM HOUSE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
BUCKNER$4,120
Individual grant recipient$2,264
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHRIST'S HOPE: $10k → 10%GIVING GRACE: $3k → 14%GIVING GRACE: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
CA
CO
MO
VA
TN
NC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$877k · 8 repeat orgs$269k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
9

Total granted

$877k
$120k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+10%

Still filing today

50%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $149k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesReligionCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BU
    BAYLOR UNIVERSITY - GIVE LIGHT CAMP
    2× · 2023–2024 · $600k
  • NB
    NORTHWEST BIBLE CHURCH
    2× · 2023–2024 · $100k
  • OV
    ONE VOICE BOARD INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $70k · revenue -36% · 52% of their budget

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $18k
  • AP
    Alternatives Pregnancy Center
    one grant, 2023 · $18k · revenue -8%
  • CA
    COME AND SEE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
2
Jesus in Vietnam Ministries
Religion
3
Hilo Ministries Inc

To be an organization where people are excited to assist in the love and care of the orphan and those in foster care, as well as providing temporary housing and training for those in the worldwide missionary field.

Human Services
4
Project New Hope International

Publicly supported evangelical organization focused on community transformation and empowerment of impoverished neighborhoods in South America and around the world. Missionaries work with community leaders assisting them in various mission…

—
5
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
6
Christian Ministries International
—
7
Vision International Missions

To propagate the gospel of jesus christ; to examine candidates and appoint missionaries. to endorse missionary programs according to standards set forth in the new testament, to establish churches, church schools & mission societies in…

Religion
8
Hope Outreach International Ministries

Evangelizing the lost through gospel crusades, camps and conferences; Empowering orphans and widows and those in need through Christ-centered vocational training; and Equipping ministers of the gospel through Christian seminars and…

Religion
9
Discover Your Mission Inc

Supporing missionaries worldwide

Religion
10
Abbas House
Philanthropy
11
Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture
12
Be Hope International
Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christs Hope U S a Inc; the most unlike its peers is Send Hope Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BAYLOR UNIVERSITY - GIVE LIGHT CAMP: $600,000 · OtherBAYLOR UNIVERSITY - GIVE LIGHT CAMPNORTHWEST BIBLE CHURCH: $100,000 · OtherNORTHWEST BIBLE CHURCHARBOR ROAD CHURCH: $60,000 · OtherARBOR ROAD CHURCHCAMPUS OUTREACH: $43,500 · Other+14 more: $202,088 · Other+14 moreONE VOICE BOARD INC: $70,000 · ReligionSEND HOPE INC: $15,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $10,000 · InternationalDENTON FREEDOM HOUSE: $17,500 · Crime & LegalFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHRISTS HOPE U S A INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesGIVING GRACE INC: $3,500 · Human Services
Other$1,005,588Religion$70,000International$25,000Crime & Legal$17,500Youth Development$15,000Human Services$13,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetONE VOICE BOARD INC: $70,000 over 2y, 52% of budgetMissionary Athletes International and Charlotte Eagles Inc: $20,129 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAlternatives Pregnancy Center: $17,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetDENTON FREEDOM HOUSE: $17,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSEND HOPE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTS HOPE U S A INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIVING GRACE INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ONE VOICE BOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds Missionary Athletes International and Charlotte Eagles Inc ↗
  • Who funds Alternatives Pregnancy Center ↗
  • Who funds DENTON FREEDOM HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds SEND HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTS HOPE U S A INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds GIVING GRACE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX14× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ppa Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ppa Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ppa Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ppa Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ppa’s filings →

    More from the funding graph