· Charitable trust
Portland Rotary Charitable Trust
The Portland Rotary Charitable Trust is the entity by which the rotary club of portland carries out its philanthropic activities in both the local and world communities servicing primarily the needs of youth.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $137,856 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $316,864 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $179,008 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $112k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NUMOTION | $56,676 |
| ROTARY CLUB OF PORTLAND | $55,000 |
| LAKE OSWEGO ROTARY FND | $12,180 |
| CALL TO SAFETY | $8,000 |
| SERENDIPITY CENTER | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $113k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
12 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 54% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMORRISON CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES3× · 2018–2021 · $195k · revenue +52%
- WPWARNER PACIFIC UNIVERSITY2× · 2023–2024 · $37k · revenue +21%
- SUSHELTERBOX USA INC4× · 2017–2021 · $33k · revenue +147%
Funded once
- NNUMOTIONone grant, 2020 · $53k
- RDROTARY DISTRICT 5100 YEone grant, 2019 · $16k
- GCGreater Clark County Rotary Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $16k · revenue +45%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Building brighter futures with children and families.
To eliminate racism, empower women and promote peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.
To help empower african americans and others achieve equality in education, employment, and economic security.
To help strengthen and heal children and families, and the community. olalla center's staff believes all children and families can heal and this premise is the foundation of olalla center's treatment philosophy and the basis for their work.
The organization provides the highest quality services in education, mentoring, family outreach, employment training and placement.
Building strong connections for healthy communities through mental health programs, youth empowerment services and family services.
Cairo advocates for and acts to increase equity and social justice through programs, services, and community organizing for immigrant children, youth and families to thrive.
The organization collectively works alongside those on the margins to empower individuals and communities through an inclusive range of services and support in east portland.
Fact oregon empowers families, youth, and communities to navigate disability systems, advocating together for disability justice and policy change so that people with disabilities have what they need to thrive at home, in school, and in…
Children's institute's mission is to leverage research, practice, policy, and advocacy to shift systems toward justice for families so that all of oregon's children, prenatal to grade 5, have access to opportunity.
Our children oregon's mission is to be a voice and force for the common good for all oregon children, ensuring all children have the resources and opportunities they need to reach their full potential. we elevate data and the voices of…
To provide youth in crisis a place of physical and emotional safety while assisting them to build positive relationships and develop their individual potentials.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth Progress Association and the most unlike its peers is Numotion Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MORRISON CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds NUMOTION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Rotary Club of Portland ↗
- Who funds WARNER PACIFIC UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds SHELTERBOX USA INC ↗
- Who funds LAKE OSWEGO ROTARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CASCADE PACIFIC COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds RAPHAEL HOUSE OF PORTLAND ↗
- Who funds THE BOYS & GIRLS AID SOCIETY OF OREGON ↗
- Who funds Greater Clark County Rotary Foundation ↗
- Who funds SERENDIPITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds TUCKER MAXON SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST ASSOCIATION FOR BLIND ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds FOCUS ON YOUTH ↗
- Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds PARROTT CREEK CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Bradley Angle ↗
- Who funds MAURICE LUCAS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PATH HOME ↗
- Who funds CALL TO SAFETY ↗
- Who funds Pathfinders of Oregon ↗
- Who funds Feed The Mass ↗
- Who funds MY FATHERS HOUSE ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND METRO EAST ↗
- Who funds HELP ELEVATE LEARNING PROCESSING INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN-PORTLAND ↗
- Who funds MT HOOD KIWANIS CAMP ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF CRESTON'S CHILDREN DENTAL CLINIC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CYCLING CENTER ↗
- Who funds KAIROSPDX ↗
- Who funds ROTARY ACTION GROUP FOR PEACE ↗
- Who funds YOUTH PROGRESS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Latino Network ↗
- Who funds FORA HEALTH INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Juan Young Trust · The Collins Foundation · The Jackson Foundation · Hoover Family Foundation · The Harold & Arlene Schnitzer Care Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · The Reser Family Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Portland Rotary Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Morrison Child and Family Services — 91% of income from government
- Call to Safety — 61% of income from government
- Pathfinders of Oregon — 57% of income from government
- Portland YouthBuilders — 35% of income from government
- Youth Progress Association — 29% of income from government
- Project 48 Inc — 23% of income from government
- Parrott Creek Child and Family Services — 20% of income from government
- Kairospdx — 19% of income from government
- Mt Hood Kiwanis Camp — 18% of income from government
- Latino Network — 15% of income from government
- Habitat for Humanity Portland Metro East — 14% of income from government
- Warner Pacific University — 14% of income from government
- Raphael House of Portland — 10% of income from government
- Bradley Angle — 10% of income from government
- Friends of the Children-Portland — 5% of income from government
- The Boys & Girls Aid Society of Oregon — 3% of income from government
- Friendly House Inc — 3% of income from government
- Community Cycling Center — 2% of income from government
- Serendipity Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- William Temple House — 0% of income from government
- Period Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.