Skip to content

· Private foundation

Porter Edwin M Educational Fund

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$9k
Granted FY2026still arriving
5
Grants FY2026still arriving
3
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$103kRecreation & Sports$6k
02FY2026 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,900
Median grant
3
States reached
$221k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL METHODIST UNIVERSITY$4,200
SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY$1,900
COLUMBIA COLLEGE$1,900
WASHBURN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW$500
MARYVILLE UNIVERSITY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COLUMBIA COLLEGE: $2k → 16%WASHBURN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW: $500 → 14%MARYVILLE UNIVERSITY: $500 → 11%COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $250 → 14%SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 14%MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 15%CENTRAL METHODIST UNIVERSITY: $4k → 16%MOBERLY AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2k → 17%NORTHWEST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY: $250 → 17%MISSOURI WELDING INSTITUTE: $2k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$100k · 12 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2026, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
12

Total granted

$100k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+9%

Still filing today

33%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI
    3× · 2022–2024 · $29k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIA
    3× · 2020–2025 · $15k
  • MU
    Maryville University - St Louis
    7× · 2019–2026 · $11k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • CC
    COLUMBIA COLLEGE
    one grant, 2022 · $4k · revenue -18%
  • SI
    SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY- CARBONDALE
    one grant, 2025 · $2k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
2
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
3
Simpson College

Through innovative learning opportunities, individual student attention, and an unwavering commitment to inclusive educational access, simpson college cultivates a diverse community of learners to lead lives of meaning and purpose.

Education
4
Coker University

Coker university is a student-centered, comprehensive university. it is dedicated to providing every student an academic curriculum based upon a uniformly excellent liberal arts core that enhances the structured development of key personal…

Education
5
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
6
Central Christian College of Kansas

Central christian college of kansas is a four-year, non-profit liberal arts college with the primary mission of offering a christ-centered education for character.

Education
7
The President and Trustees of Colby College

to provide a rigorous and transformative liberal arts education that prepares students to become thoughtful, engaged citizens.

Education
8
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
9
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
10
Capital University

Capital university transforms lives by empowering an inclusive community of learners through engaging academic, co-curricular, and professional experiences.

Education
11
Spartanburg Methodist College

SMC Delivers an exceptional education that fuses the empowerment of the liberal arts with crucial career skills. Our mission is to equip our students with the knowledge, skills, virtues, and mindset needed to thrive personally, create…

Education
12
University of the South

The College of Arts and Sciences is committed to the development of the whole person through a liberal arts education of the highest quality. The School of Theology educates women and men to serve the broad whole of the Episcopal Church in…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Columbia College; the most unlike its peers is Southwest Baptist University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI: $29,300 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURIUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIA: $14,790 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIANORTHWEST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY: $9,750 · OtherNORTHWEST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITYTRUMAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $7,980 · OtherTRUMAN STATE UNIVERSITYSOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY: $6,280 · OtherSOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITYMISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE: $4,330 · OtherMISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY: $3,000 · Other+9 more: $11,500 · Other+9 moreMaryville University - St Louis: $11,080 · EducationMaryville University - St Loui…CENTRAL METHODIST UNIVERSITY: $6,200 · EducationCENTRAL METHODIST UNIVERSITYCOLUMBIA COLLEGE: $4,000 · EducationCOLUMBIA COLLEGECULVER-STOCKTON COLLEGE: $3,410 · EducationCULVER-STOCKTON COLLEGEHannibal LaGrange University: $3,000 · EducationHannibal LaGrange UniversityColumbia College: $1,900 · EducationColumbia CollegeSOUTHWEST BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $1,230 · Education+2 more: $500 · Education
Other$86,930Education$31,320

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMaryville University - St Louis: $11,080 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL METHODIST UNIVERSITY: $6,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBIA COLLEGE: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCULVER-STOCKTON COLLEGE: $3,410 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHannibal LaGrange University: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $1,230 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM WOODS UNIVERSITY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Maryville University - St Louis ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL METHODIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CULVER-STOCKTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Hannibal LaGrange University ↗
  • Who funds Columbia College ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM WOODS UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Missouri Colleges Fund IncMO17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Missouri Colleges Fund Inc · Hardin Memorial Scholarship Foundation · T Michal Flottman Scholarship Trust · The Gr & Mf Nichols Foundation · Griffin Family Foundation Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · Bour Memorial Scholarship Fund American National Bank of Texas · Jl & Da Hays Memorial Scholarship Trust · Virginia Thomas Charitable Trust · Brent Taylor Perpetual Char Trust Mercantile Bank Trustee · William Edgar Charitable Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Porter Edwin M Educational Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Porter Edwin M Educational Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Porter Edwin M Educational’s filings →

    More from the funding graph