Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Porter Edwin M Educational Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$12k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$103kRecreation & Sports$6k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,750
Median grant
3
States reached
$207k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIA$7,750
SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY$2,000
SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY CARBONDALE$1,750
WILLIAM WOODS UNIVERSITY$250
MARYVILLE UNIVERSITY$250
WASHBURN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–17) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS: $250 → 14%MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 15%MOBERLY AREA COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2k → 17%NORTHWEST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY: $250 → 17%MISSOURI WELDING INSTITUTE: $2k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$93k · 11 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
10

Total granted

$93k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+9%

Still filing today

36%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI
    3× · 2022–2024 · $29k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIA
    3× · 2020–2025 · $15k
  • MU
    Maryville University - St Louis
    6× · 2019–2025 · $11k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • CC
    COLUMBIA COLLEGE
    one grant, 2022 · $4k · revenue -18%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS
    one grant, 2019 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
2
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
3
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
4
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
5
Coker University

Coker university is a student-centered, comprehensive university. it is dedicated to providing every student an academic curriculum based upon a uniformly excellent liberal arts core that enhances the structured development of key personal…

Education
6
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
7
Simpson College

Through innovative learning opportunities, individual student attention, and an unwavering commitment to inclusive educational access, simpson college cultivates a diverse community of learners to lead lives of meaning and purpose.

Education
8
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
9
Calvin University

The mission of calvin university is to equip students to think deeply, to act justly, and to live wholeheartedly as christ's agents of renewal in the world.

Education
10
University of the Southwest

University of the southwest is a christ-centered educational community dedicated to developing men and women for a lifetime of servant leadership by emphasizing faith, responsibility, and initiative.

Education
11
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
12
Central Christian College of Kansas

Central christian college of kansas is a four-year, non-profit liberal arts college with the primary mission of offering a christ-centered education for character.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maryville University - St Louis and the most unlike its peers is Southwest Baptist University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI — $29,300 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURIUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIA — $14,790 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI - COLUMBIANORTHWEST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY — $9,750 · OtherNORTHWEST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITYTRUMAN STATE UNIVERSITY — $7,980 · OtherTRUMAN STATE UNIVERSITYSOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY — $4,380 · OtherMISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE — $4,330 · OtherMISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY — $3,000 · Other+9 more — $11,000 · Other+9 moreMaryville University - St Louis — $10,580 · EducationMaryville University - St…COLUMBIA COLLEGE — $4,000 · EducationCOLUMBIA COLLEGECULVER-STOCKTON COLLEGE — $3,410 · EducationCULVER-STOCKTON COLLEGEHannibal LaGrange University — $3,000 · EducationHannibal LaGrange Univers…CENTRAL METHODIST UNIVERSITY — $2,000 · EducationCENTRAL METHODIST UNIVERS…SOUTHWEST BAPTIST UNIVERSITY — $1,230 · Education+2 more — $500 · Education
Other$84,530Education$24,720

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMaryville University - St Louis — $10,580 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBIA COLLEGE — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCULVER-STOCKTON COLLEGE — $3,410 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHannibal LaGrange University — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL METHODIST UNIVERSITY — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST BAPTIST UNIVERSITY — $1,230 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM WOODS UNIVERSITY — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Maryville University - St Louis
  • Who funds COLUMBIA COLLEGE
  • Who funds CULVER-STOCKTON COLLEGE
  • Who funds Hannibal LaGrange University
  • Who funds CENTRAL METHODIST UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST BAPTIST UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds WILLIAM WOODS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Missouri Colleges Fund IncMO17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Missouri Colleges Fund Inc · Hardin Memorial Scholarship Foundation · T Michal Flottman Scholarship Trust · The Gr & Mf Nichols Foundation · Griffin Family Foundation Inc · Tulsa Community Foundation · Bour Memorial Scholarship Fund American National Bank of Texas · Jl & Da Hays Memorial Scholarship Trust · Virginia Thomas Charitable Trust · Brent Taylor Perpetual Char Trust Mercantile Bank Trustee · William Edgar Charitable Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Porter Edwin M Educational Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph