Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Virginia Thomas Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$70k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Education$514k
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $26k
$2,400
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
State Fair Community College$26,250
Westminster College$7,925
University of Missouri Columbia$4,900
University of Central Missouri$4,900
State Technical College$4,650
Mission University$3,650
William Woods University$3,650
Washington University$2,400
Carnegie Mellon University$2,400
Columbia College$1,900
Central Methodist University$1,875
University of Missouri-Kansas City$1,250
Lindenwood University$1,250
Missouri State University$1,250
Lincoln University$1,250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%University of Pittsburgh: $3k → 11%Lindenwood University: $2k → 5%Park University: $2k → 8%State Technical College: $10k → 8%Lincoln University: $5k → 10%Westminster College: $8k → 11%State Fair Community College: $39k → 13%Culver-Stockton University: $5k → 14%University of Central Missouri: $16k → 14%Ozark Technical College: $3k → 15%Missouri Valley College: $5k → 15%Missouri S & T: $5k → 16%Columbia College: $3k → 17%NW Missouri State: $7k → 17%Missouri Southern University: $3k → 18%State Technical College: $8k → 8%Lincoln University: $3k → 10%Westminster College: $8k → 11%State Fair Community College: $26k → 13%University of Central Missouri: $12k → 14%Missouri S & T: $4k → 16%Northwest Missouri State: $3k → 17%State Technical College: $5k → 8%Lincoln University: $3k → 10%Westminster College: $7k → 11%State Fair Community College: $21k → 13%University of Central Missouri: $12k → 14%State Technical College: $5k → 8%Lincoln University: $3k → 10%Westminster College: $7k → 11%State Fair Community College: $21k → 13%University of Central Missouri: $11k → 14%State Technical College: $4k → 8%William Woods University: $4k → 11%State Fair Community College: $21k → 13%University of Central Missouri: $9k → 14%William Woods University: $4k → 11%State Fair Community College: $15k → 13%University of Central Missouri: $6k → 14%Missouri State University: $11k → 15%William Woods University: $3k → 11%State Fair Community College: $13k → 13%University of Central Missouri: $5k → 14%Missouri State University: $10k → 15%Missouri State University: $9k → 15%Missouri State University: $8k → 15%Missouri State University: $3k → 15%Mission University: $4k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
NY
IN
OH
PA
UT
MO
KS

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$477k · 20 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
13

Total granted

$477k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+22%

Still filing today

35%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WW
    WILLIAM WOODS UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $12k · revenue +38%
  • MV
    MISSOURI VALLEY COLLEGE
    4× · 2018–2021 · $10k · revenue +40%
  • CM
    CENTRAL METHODIST UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2018–2024 · $5k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $7k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +11%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
2
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
3
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
4
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
5
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
6
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
7
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
8
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

9
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
10
Mcdaniel College Inc

Mcdaniel college is a diverse student-centered community committed to excellence in the liberal arts & sciences and professional studies with careful mentoring and attention to the individual. mcdaniel changes lives. we challenge students…

Education
11
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
12
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Columbia College and the most unlike its peers is A T Still University of Health Sciences. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

State Fair Community College — $155,700 · OtherState Fair Community CollegeUniversity of Central Missouri — $70,125 · OtherUniversity of Central MissouriUniversity of Missouri Columbia — $51,850 · OtherUniversity of Missouri ColumbiaMissouri State University — $42,650 · OtherMissouri State UniversityState Technical College — $32,900 · OtherState Technical CollegeLINCOLN UNIVERSITY — $16,050 · Other+18 more — $62,175 · Other+18 moreWESTMINSTER COLLEGE — $29,325 · EducationWESTMINSTER COLLEG…WILLIAM WOODS UNIVERSITY — $11,850 · EducationWILLIAM WOODS UNIV…MISSOURI VALLEY COLLEGE — $9,850 · EducationMISSOURI VALLEY CO…COLUMBIA COLLEGE — $8,350 · EducationCOLUMBIA COLLEGECENTRAL METHODIST UNIVERSITY — $5,150 · EducationCENTRAL METHODIST …LINDENWOOD EDUCATION SYSTEM — $3,650 · Education+8 more — $14,750 · Education+8 more
Other$431,450Education$82,925

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWESTMINSTER COLLEGE — $29,325 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWILLIAM WOODS UNIVERSITY — $11,850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI VALLEY COLLEGE — $9,850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBIA COLLEGE — $8,350 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL METHODIST UNIVERSITY — $5,150 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLINDENWOOD EDUCATION SYSTEM — $3,650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $2,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University — $2,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARK UNIVERSITY — $2,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA T Still University of Health Sciences — $1,350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST BAPTIST UNIVERSITY — $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWebster University — $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTiffin University — $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WESTMINSTER COLLEGE
  • Who funds WILLIAM WOODS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds MISSOURI VALLEY COLLEGE
  • Who funds COLUMBIA COLLEGE
  • Who funds CENTRAL METHODIST UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds LINDENWOOD EDUCATION SYSTEM
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
  • Who funds CULINARY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Carnegie Mellon University
  • Who funds PARK UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds A T Still University of Health Sciences
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST BAPTIST UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Webster University
  • Who funds Tiffin University

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK22.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · T Michal Flottman Scholarship Trust · Griffin Family Foundation Inc · Missouri Colleges Fund Inc · Jack J Isgur Foundation · Bour Memorial Scholarship Fund American National Bank of Texas · The Gr & Mf Nichols Foundation · Folds of Honor Foundation · William Edgar Charitable Foundation · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Porter Edwin M Educational Fund · Lester R Birbeck Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Virginia Thomas Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph