How much does Population Services International give?

Population Services International reported 18 itemized grants totaling $21,708,519, out of $87,332,039 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 16 and 25 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.

What does Population Services International fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Health (52%), International (45%), Human Services (2%).

Who are Population Services International's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Jhpiego Corporation ($59M), Management Sciences for Health Inc ($17M), Medical Care Development Inc ($15M).

Does Population Services International fund new organizations?

In FY2023, 23% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Which funders back the same organizations as Population Services International?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Gates Foundation, Family Health International Inc, Johns Hopkins University.

Where is Population Services International based?

Population Services International is based in DC.

Population Services International

Population Services International at a glance Mostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Population Services International

Psi makes it easier for all people to lead healthier lives and plan the families they desire.

$87M

Granted FY2024still arriving

Grants FY2024still arriving

States reached

$4.6M

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$88MInternational$76MHuman Services$3.7MEducation$1.1MEnvironment$763kCivil Rights$427kCommunity Improvement$134kScience & Tech$16k

02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured

The 18 grants below total $21,708,519, the rows itemized in this filing. The $87,332,039 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $65,623,520 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k1 grant · $47k
$50k–250k6 grants · $1.0M
$250k+11 grants · $21M

$619,173

Median grant

States reached

$258M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
Jhpiego Corporation	$4,577,679
PATH	$4,252,906
FHI 360	$3,327,609
Management Sciences for Health Inc (MSH)	$1,987,986
CARE International	$1,684,861
International Rescue Committee	$1,273,997
MSI Reproductive Choices	$1,159,113
CONCERN WORLDWIDE US INC	$1,064,946
The Regents of University of California	$619,173
Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc	$385,294
Athena Infonomics LLC	$322,794
Medical Care Development Inc	$224,149
ThinkWell Institute	$203,464
Planet Partnerships LLC	$176,220
Partners in Compassion (PC)	$172,145

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $3.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

Grants abroad, by region: $68M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$50M · 73% · 52 grants

Stated purpose: Program Services

South Asia$9.4M · 14% · 6 grants

Stated purpose: Program Services

East Asia and the Pacific$8.6M · 13% · 15 grants

Stated purpose: Program Services

South America$152k · 0% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: Program Services

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$163M · 39 repeat orgs$6.2M to everyone else

39 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$163M

$4.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-8%

+28%

Still filing today

72%

75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

InternationalHealthHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementSocial ScienceOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

P(
PATH (PEOPLE ACTING TO HELP) INC
8× · 2017–2024 · $13M · revenue +38%
IR
International Rescue Committee INC
4× · 2021–2024 · $4.9M · revenue +38%
CH
CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE INC
5× · 2020–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +24%

Funded once

MC
MALARIA CONSORTIUM US INCgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $1.6M · revenue +52%
FP
FONDATION POUR LA SANTE REPRODUCTRICE ET LEDUCATIONgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $556k · revenue +28%
EG
ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION
one grant, 2017 · $527k · revenue -23%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International

International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A global nonprofit biomedical research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International

Path

Path makes good health more accessible in 70+ countries by improving the health care people receive, creating affordable health products, and advancing effective health policies. across all our projects and programs, (continued on schedule…

International

Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International

Ibis Reproductive Health Inc

Ibis reproductive health drives change through bold, rigorous research and principled partnerships that advance sexual and reproductive autonomy, choices and health worldwide.

Health

International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International

Women in Global Health Inc

Women in global health (wgh) is a global movement and organization that brings together all genders and backgrounds to achieve gender equality in global health leadership.

Public Benefit

International Partnership for Microbicides Inc

To develop hiv prevention products and other sexual and reproductive health technologies for women, and to make them available and accessible where they are urgently needed.

—

Engenderhealth Inc

Engenderhealth envisions a gender-equal world where all people have the agency, resources, and opportunities to live healthy lives.(see schedule o)

International

Health Global Access Project Incorporated

Health gap is an international advocacy organization working to accelerate the end of the aids pandemic by eliminating the barriers to affordable lifesaving treatment for people living with hiv around the world.

Health

Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation

Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…

Health

Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Health International Inc; the most unlike its peers is Devworks International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

43/43

Grantees still filing

23/43

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$96,318,963International$44,019,908Health$18,864,690Community Improvement$3,782,390Human Services$3,137,633Philanthropy$2,234,133Education$1,390,492

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gates FoundationWA41.6× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gates Foundation · Family Health International Inc · Johns Hopkins University · Path · Jsi Research & Training Institute Inc · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Jhpiego Corporation · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · The Rockefeller Foundation · The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation · Georgetown University

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Population Services International funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Population Services International. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

2rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Population Services International’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home