Skip to content

· Private foundation

Pontikes Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$294k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Human Services$379kHealth$128kArts & Culture$28kEducation$25kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kInternational$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $280k
$50,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOC-F$100,000
TOMAHAWK CHARITABLE SOLUTIONS FOUNDATION INC$80,000
THE STATION FOUNDATION$50,000
THE VETERANS CENTER$50,000
STRINGS MUSIC FESTIVAL$10,000
PORTLAND SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$1,971
TOMAHAWK CHARITABLE SOLUTIONS FOUNDATION INC$1,815
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SPECIAL OPERATIONS CARE FUND: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$811k · 4 repeat orgs$119k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
5

Total granted

$811k
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+20%

Still filing today

75%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesHealthEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    TOMAHAWK CHARITABLE SOLUTIONS FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $309k · revenue +21%
  • TS
    THE STATION FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $125k · revenue +5%
  • SM
    STRINGS MUSIC FESTIVAL
    3× · 2023–2025 · $26k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • University of Chicago
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +15%
  • SO
    SPECIAL OPERATIONS CARE FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +31%
  • SF
    SPECIAL FORCES ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Special Operators Transition Foundation Inc

The special operators transition foundation ("sotf") assists special operation forces veterans transition from the military into their next successful career.

Public Benefit
2
Military Special Operations Family Collaborative Inc

Msofc's mission is to enable the sustained success of america's special ops warriors and families through collaborative health and well-being research and programs. these programs include virtual education events, training & workshops for…

Human Services
3
Special Forces Foundation

The special forces foundation provides immediate and ongoing support to the special forces community and their families.

Philanthropy
4
Special Forces Scholarship Fund

The purpose of the special forces scholarship fund (sfsf) is to award merit based post secondary educational scholarships to the daughters and sons of current and veteran special forces soldiers.

Education
5
North Carolina Symphony Society Inc

To be north carolina's state orchestra, an orchestra achieving the highest level of artistic quality and performance standards, and embracing its dual legacies of statewide service and music education.

Arts & Culture
6
Special Ops Survivors

Special ops survivors advances the mission "to embrace and empower surviving spouses of fallen special operations heroes to build healthy post-loss futures as they transition and rebuild their new lives." the foundation provides programs…

Human Services
7
Special Operations Association of America Foundation

We are committed to American interests, both domestic and abroad. We strive to enhance national security and enrich our democracy, elevating our communitys voice and promoting the Ground Truth to the highest levels of government. We are…

Human Services
8
Special Operations Fund

The Special Operations Fund (the "Fund") is a nonprofit organization that provides educational grants and support to the families of special mission unit warriors killed in action, killed in training, died in the line of duty, suicide, and…

Education
9
Special Operations Association Foundation

The Special Operations Association Foundation supports Special Operations veterans and active-duty members, along with their families and survivors. The goals are to support the educational awards program, provide emotional support to…

Public Benefit
10
Special Operations Association of America

We are committed to american interests, both domestic and abroad. strive to enhance national security and enrich our democracy, elevating our community's voice and promoting the ground truth to the highest levels of government. committed…

Public Benefit
11
North Carolina Symphony Foundation

To receive and hold the endowment of the north carolina symphony society, inc. (the "society"), solicit additions to the endowment, safeguard assets, and expend funds for the exclusive use and benefit of the society.

Arts & Culture
12
Society of Military Orthopaedic Surgeons

Provide a forum for the interchange of medical knowledge as it relates to the practice of care for military personnel.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tomahawk Charitable Solutions Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Working Bikes. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SOC-F: $352,000 · OtherSOC-FTHE VETERANS CENTER: $50,000 · OtherTHE VETERANS CENTERSPECIAL FORCES ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · Other+1 more: $2,500 · OtherTOMAHAWK CHARITABLE SOLUTIONS FOUNDATION INC: $308,629 · Public Safety & DisasterTOMAHAWK CHARITABLE SOLUTIONS FOUNDAT…THE STATION FOUNDATION: $125,000 · HealthTHE STATION FOU…STRINGS MUSIC FESTIVAL: $25,555 · Arts & CulturePORTLAND MAINE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $1,971 · Arts & CultureUniversity of Chicago: $25,000 · EducationSPECIAL OPERATIONS CARE FUND INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesWorking Bikes: $4,500 · International
Other$419,500Public Safety & Disaster$308,629Health$125,000Arts & Culture$27,526Education$25,000Human Services$20,000International$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTOMAHAWK CHARITABLE SOLUTIONS FOUNDATION INC: $308,629 over 5y, 8.3% of budgetTHE STATION FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetSTRINGS MUSIC FESTIVAL: $25,555 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OPERATIONS CARE FUND INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSPECIAL FORCES ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWorking Bikes: $4,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPORTLAND MAINE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $1,971 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA10.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Pontikes Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Pontikes Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Pontikes Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Pontikes Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pontikes Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph