· Private foundation
Pond Lehocky Giordano Foundation
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NO KID HUNGRY | $500 |
| LUPUS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA | $250 |
| JUSTINIAN FOUNDATION | $250 |
| BEVERLY'S BIRTHDAYS | $250 |
| TOYS FOR TOTS | $250 |
| GUNS DOWN GLOVES UP | $250 |
| ALABAMA MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION | $250 |
| HOPE WALKS INC FREEDOM FROM CLUBFOOT | $250 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL | $250 |
| FUNDACION PRO AYUDA DE PUERTO RICO | $250 |
| EMPOWERING CUTS | $250 |
| MALEEK JACKSON GYMAZZIM DUKES INITIATIVE | $250 |
| METAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC | $250 |
| UNITE FOR HER | $250 |
| LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY | $250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2023, 15 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DPDISABILITY PRIDE PHILADELPHIA INC4× · 2020–2023 · $2k · revenue +115%
- RMRock Minstries of Philadelphia Inc3× · 2020–2022 · $2k · revenue +165%
- SOSPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INC3× · 2020–2022 · $2k · revenue +86%
Funded once
- PAPA Alliance Foundationone grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue -39%
- DUDREXEL UNIVERSITYone grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +10%
- CCCANCER CARE CONNECTIONone grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue -54%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…
Accessmatters' mission is to protect, expand, and enhance access to sexual and reproductive health care and information for all people. accessmatters fulfills its mission by providing services and information directly to people, by…
The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…
Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.
The women against abuse legal center provides free attorney representation, advocacy and telephone counseling to victims of domestic violence seeking legal protections in philadelphia.
The policy center is improving maternal mental health outcomes through closing gaps in care delivery, including improving detection and access to evidence-based and informed clinical and community-based care. the policy center has been…
The american lung association's mission is to save lives by improving lung health and preventing lung disease. we do this through education, advocacy, and research.
Summary
Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.
The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…
The philadelphia convention & visitors bureau (phlcvb) is the official tourism promotion agency for the city of philadelphia globally, and the sales and marketing agency for the pennsylvania convention center (pcc). phlcvb markets…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minding Your Mind and the most unlike its peers is Guns Down Gloves Up. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PA Alliance Foundation ↗
- Who funds DREXEL UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CANCER CARE CONNECTION ↗
- Who funds DISABILITY PRIDE PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
- Who funds Rock Minstries of Philadelphia Inc ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INC ↗
- Who funds TRAVELERS AID SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
- Who funds SHARE FOOD PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds BEVERLY'S PGH ↗
- Who funds WILLIAM WAY LGBT COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds LAUREL HOUSE ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOME ↗
- Who funds CHILDPROMISE INC ↗
- Who funds MAKE THE WORLD BETTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Travis Manion Foundation ↗
- Who funds LUPUS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds OPERATION GRATITUDE INC ↗
- Who funds Pennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF EASTERN PA ↗
- Who funds CARING FOR FRIENDS ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
- Who funds FUNDACION PRO AYUDA DE PUERTO RICO INC ↗
- Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LISAS ARMY INC ↗
- Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds BACK ON MY FEET ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · The Cigna Group Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Bread and Roses Community Fund · W W Smith Charitable Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Verizon Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Pond Lehocky Giordano Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Cancer Care Connection — 48% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.