Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Pond House Woods Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$141k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$355kHealth$174kArts & Culture$53kInternational$36kAnimals$18kPublic Benefit$18kCrime & Legal$6kHousing & Shelter$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SKOKIE VALLEY ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION$50,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$45,000
BREAKTHROUGH T1D$25,000
CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$10,000
CELEBRATION EDUCATION FUND$8,000
WEST SUBURBAN HUMANE SOCIETY$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KENNEDYS DISEASE ASSOCIATION: $8k → 22%BREAST CANCER RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 10%CELEBRATION EDUCATION FUND: $10k → 11%BERRIEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 15%APPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT INC: $5k → 14%HONOR FLIGHT DAYTON INCORPORATED: $6k → 15%NATIONWIDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $5k → 15%WEST SUBURBAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $4k → 7%CHICAGO VOLUNTEER LEGAL SERVICES FOUNDATION: $4k → 14%BREAST CANCER RESOURCE CENTER: $5k → 10%CELEBRATION EDUCATION FUND: $10k → 11%HONOR FLIGHT DAYTON INCORPORATED: $3k → 15%WEST SUBURBAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $3k → 7%CHICAGO VOLUNTEER LEGAL SERVICES FOUNDATION: $3k → 14%BREAST CANCER RESOURCE CENTER: $3k → 10%CELEBRATION EDUCATION FUND: $8k → 11%HONOR FLIGHT DAYTON INCORPORATED: $3k → 15%WEST SUBURBAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $3k → 7%INCLUSIVE COLLECTIVE: $2k → 14%BREAST CANCER RESOURCE CENTER: $3k → 10%CELEBRATION EDUCATION FUND: $8k → 11%HONOR FLIGHT DAYTON INCORPORATED: $3k → 15%WEST SUBURBAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $3k → 7%PARK RIDGE CIVIC ORCHESTRA: $3k → 14%HONOR FLIGHT DAYTON INCORPORATED: $3k → 15%WEST SUBURBAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $3k → 7%INCLUSIVE COLLECTIVE: $2k → 14%WEST SUBURBAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $3k → 7%CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA - ILLINOIS: $10k → 14%CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $10k → 14%CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $10k → 14%CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA - ILLINOIS: $10k → 14%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $45k → 14%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF LAGRANGE: $40k → 14%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $40k → 14%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $40k → 14%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF LAGRANGE: $40k → 14%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF LAGRANGE: $40k → 14%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF LAGRANGE: $39k → 14%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF LAGRANGE: $38k → 14%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF LAGRANGE: $33k → 14%SKOKIE VALLEY ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION: $50k → 14%JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION INTERNATIONA: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
OH
CA
MD
TN
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$598k · 12 repeat orgs$71k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
4

Total granted

$598k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+83%

Still filing today

58%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPublic BenefitInternationalHousing & ShelterArts & CultureAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1D
    2× · 2024–2025 · $50k · revenue +17%
  • CE
    CELEBRATION EDUCATION FUND
    4× · 2022–2025 · $36k · revenue +64%
  • BC
    BREAST CANCER RESOURCE CENTER
    4× · 2018–2023 · $21k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • KD
    KENNEDY'S DISEASE ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue +113%
  • AS
    APPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +83%
  • NC
    NATIONWIDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2022 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Baltimore Symphony Orchestra Inc

The baltimore symphony orchestra's (bso) mission is to promote, organize, manage and maintain a symphony orchestra for the city of baltimore and the state of maryland and to hold, sponsor, and present musical concerts by the baltimore…

Arts & Culture
2
Berkeley Community Chorus & Orchestra

Berkeley community chorus & orchestra now in its 60th year has preserved three founding principles over the years: we acceept singers regardless of qualification and experience we give concerts of significant symphonic choral works with a…

Arts & Culture
3
The Chicago Community Loan Fund

Organization provides low-cost, flexible financing to non-profit and for-profit community development organizations for the revitalization of low and moderate income neighborhoods throughout metropolitan chicago.

Community Improvement
4
The Chicago Chamber Music Society

Chamber music concerts

5
Baltimore Symphony Endowment Trust

The organization is a supporting organization of the baltimore symphony orchestra, inc. (bso) and exists to support bso in accomplishing its missions. the depreciation expense of the endowment trust relates to assets used by the bso in…

Education
6
Chicago Community Bond Fund

Ccbf pays bond for people charged with crimes in cook county, illinois. through a revolving fund, ccbf supports individuals whose communities cannot afford to pay the bonds themselves and who have been impacted by structural violence.

Crime & Legal
7
Brevard Chamber Orchestra Association Inc

The mission of the brevard philharmonic is to inspire, educate, and enrich the audiences through exceptional, professional musical performances and community outreach.

8
University of Chicago Cancer Research Foundation

The mission shall be to provide fundraising, advocacy, and advisory support for cancer research at the comprehensive cancer center at the university of chicago.

Health
9
Cincinnati Zoo Foundation Inc

Perform fundraising functions, provide financial support, carryout the purpose and otherwise operating for the benefit of the zoological society of cincinnati.

Animals
10
The Chicago Bar Foundation

The chicago bar foundation brings the legal community together through advocacy, funding, and innovation to improve access to justice for people in need and to make the legal system more fair, equitable, and effective.

Education
11
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
12
Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network Inc

To increase public awareness about bladder cancer, to advance bladder cancer research, and to provide educational and support services for the bladder cancer community.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Celebration Education Fund and the most unlike its peers is Skokie Valley Orchestral Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF LAGRANGE — $230,000 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF LAGRANGEFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH — $125,000 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION INTERNATIONA — $50,000 · OtherJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDATION INTERNATIONACROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA - ILLINOIS — $20,000 · OtherCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $20,000 · Other+4 more — $18,000 · OtherBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $50,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH …BREAST CANCER RESOURCE CENTER — $21,000 · HealthBREAST CANCER…KENNEDY'S DISEASE ASSOCIATION INC — $7,700 · HealthKENNEDY'S DIS…Skokie Valley Orchestral Association — $50,000 · Arts & CultureCELEBRATION EDUCATION FUND — $36,000 · InternationalWEST SUBURBAN HUMANE SOCIETY — $18,300 · AnimalsHONOR FLIGHT DAYTON INC — $17,500 · Public BenefitAPPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT INC — $5,000 · Housing & ShelterBERRIEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$463,000Health$78,700Arts & Culture$50,000International$36,000Animals$18,300Public Benefit$17,500Housing & Shelter$5,000Philanthropy$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCELEBRATION EDUCATION FUND — $36,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetBREAST CANCER RESOURCE CENTER — $21,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetWEST SUBURBAN HUMANE SOCIETY — $18,300 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHONOR FLIGHT DAYTON INC — $17,500 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetKENNEDY'S DISEASE ASSOCIATION INC — $7,700 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCHICAGO VOLUNTEER LEGAL SERVICES FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAPPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBERRIEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINCLUSIVE COLLECTIVE — $4,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY9.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Pond House Woods Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph